scholarly journals Mutations in the Nucleosome Core Enhance Transcriptional Silencing

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1846-1859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenia Y. Xu ◽  
Xin Bi ◽  
Michael J. Holland ◽  
Daniel E. Gottschling ◽  
James R. Broach

ABSTRACT Transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces requires specific nucleosome modifications promoted in part by a complex of Sir proteins that binds to the modified nucleosomes. Recent evidence suggests that modifications of both the histone amino termini and the core domain of nucleosomes contribute to silencing. We previously identified histone H4 mutations affecting residues in the core of the nucleosome that yield enhanced silencing at telomeres. Here we show that enhanced silencing induced by these mutations increases the proportion of cells in which telomeres and silent mating-type loci are in the silent state. One H4 mutation affects the expression of a subset of genes whose expression is altered by deletion of HTZ1, which encodes the histone variant H2A.Z, suggesting that the mutation may antagonize H2A.Z incorporation into nucleosomes. A second mutation causes the spread of silencing into subtelomeric regions that are not normally silenced in wild-type cells. Mechanistically, this mutation does not significantly accelerate the formation of silent chromatin but, rather, reduces the rate of decay of the silenced state. We propose that these mutations use distinct mechanisms to affect the dynamic interplay between activation and repression at the boundary between active and silent chromatin.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Wu ◽  
Namrita Dhillon ◽  
Kelvin Du ◽  
Rohinton T. Kamakaka

AbstractGene silencing in budding yeast is mediated by Sir protein binding to unacetylated nucleosomes to form a chromatin structure that inhibits transcription. This transcriptional silencing is characterized by the high-fidelity transmission of the silent state. Despite its relative stability, the constituent parts of the silent state are in constant flux giving rise to a model that silent loci can tolerate such fluctuations without functional consequences. However, the level of tolerance is unknown and we developed a method to measure the threshold of histone acetylation that causes the silent chromatin state to switch to the active state. We show that loss of silencing required between 50% and 75% of the unacetylated histones to be replaced with acetylated histone mimics. The precise levels of unacetylated nucleosomes required varied from locus to locus and was influenced by both silencer strength and UAS enhancer/promoter strength. Simple calculations suggest that an approximately 50% reduction in the ability of acetylases to acetylate individual nucleosomes across a large domain may be sufficient to generate a transcriptionally silent region in the nucleus.


2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 452-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzu-Hao Cheng ◽  
Marc R. Gartenberg

Transcriptional silencing of the HM loci in yeast requirescis-acting elements, termed silencers, that function during S-phase passage to establish the silent state. To study the role of the regulatory elements in maintenance of repression, site-specific recombination was used to uncouple preassembled silent chromatin fragments from silencers. DNA rings excised from HMR were initially silent but ultimately reactivated, even in G1- or G2/M-arrested cells. In contrast, DNA rings bearing HML-derived sequence were stably repressed due to the presence of a protosilencing element. These data show that silencers (or protosilencers) are required continuously for maintenance of silent chromatin. Reactivation of unstably repressed rings was blocked by overexpression of silencing proteins Sir3p and Sir4p, and chromatin immunoprecipitation studies showed that overexpressed Sir3p was incorporated into silent chromatin. Importantly, the protein was incorporated even when expressed outside of S phase, during G1 arrest. That silencing factors can associate with and stabilize preassembled silent chromatin in non-S-phase cells demonstrates that heterochromatin in yeast is dynamic.


2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (20) ◽  
pp. 7806-7819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanfei Zou ◽  
Qun Yu ◽  
Xin Bi

ABSTRACT In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, silencers flanking the HML and HMR loci consist of various combinations of binding sites for Abf1p, Rap1p, and the origin recognition complex (ORC) that serve to recruit the Sir silencing complex, thereby initiating the establishment of transcriptionally silent chromatin. There have been seemingly conflicting reports concerning whether silencers function in an orientation-dependent or -independent manner, and what determines the directionality of a silencer has not been explored. We demonstrate that chromatin plays a key role in determining the potency and directionality of silencers. We show that nucleosomes are asymmetrically distributed around the HML-I or HMR-E silencer so that a nucleosome is positioned close to the Abf1p side but not the ORC side of the silencer. This coincides with preferential association of Sir proteins and transcriptional silencing on the Abf1p side of the silencer. Elimination of the asymmetry in nucleosome positioning at a silencer leads to comparable silencing on both sides. Asymmetric nucleosome positioning in the immediate vicinity of a silencer is independent of its orientation and genomic context, indicating that it is the inherent property of the silencer. Moreover, it is also independent of the Sir complex and thus precedes the formation of silent chromatin. Finally, we demonstrate that asymmetric positioning of nucleosomes and directional silencing by a silencer depend on ORC and Abf1p. We conclude that the HML-I and HMR-E silencers promote asymmetric positioning of nucleosomes, leading to unequal potentials of transcriptional silencing on their sides and, hence, directional silencing.


2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (22) ◽  
pp. 6033-6045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Jacobson ◽  
Lorraine Pillus

ABSTRACT The cellular role of the Ada2 coactivator is currently understood in the context of the SAGA histone acetyltransferase (HAT) complex, where Ada2 increases the HAT activity of Gcn5 and interacts with transcriptional activators. Here we report a new function for Ada2 in promoting transcriptional silencing at telomeres and ribosomal DNA. This silencing function is the first characterized role for Ada2 distinct from its involvement with Gcn5. Ada2 binds telomeric chromatin and the silencing protein Sir2 in vivo. Loss of ADA2 causes the spreading of Sir2 and Sir3 into subtelomeric regions and decreased histone H4 K16 acetylation. This previously uncharacterized boundary activity of Ada2 is functionally similar to, but mechanistically distinct from, that of the MYST family HAT Sas2. Mounting evidence in the literature indicates that boundary activities create chromosomal domains important for regulating gene expression in response to environmental changes. Consistent with this, we show that upon nutritional changes, Ada2 occupancy increases at a subtelomeric region proximal to a SAGA-inducible gene and causes derepression of a silenced telomeric reporter gene. Thus, Ada2, likely in the context of SAGA, is positioned at chromosomal termini to participate in both transcriptional repression and activation in response to nutrient signaling.


Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 156 (3) ◽  
pp. 933-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Lou Dula ◽  
Scott G Holmes

Abstract Transcriptional silencing at the HM loci and telomeres in yeast depends on several trans-acting factors, including Rap1p and the Sir proteins. The SUM1-1 mutation was identified by its ability to restore silencing to strains deficient in one or more of these trans-acting factors. The mechanism by which SUM1-1 bypasses the requirement for silencing proteins is not known. We identified four loci that when reduced in dosage in diploid strains increase the ability of SUM1-1 strains to suppress silencing defects. Two of the genes responsible for this effect were found to be MGA2 and SPT23. Mga2p and Spt23p were previously identified as functionally related transcription factors that influence chromatin structure. We find that deletion of MGA2 or SPT23 also increases the efficiency of silencing in haploid SUM1-1 strains. These results suggest that Mga2p and Spt23p are antagonists of silencing. Consistent with this proposal we find that deletion of MGA2 or SPT23 also suppresses the silencing defects caused by deletion of the SIR1 gene or by mutations in the HMR silencer sequences. However, we find that Mga2p and Spt23p can positively affect silencing in other contexts; deletion of either MGA2 or SPT23 decreases mating in strains bearing mutations in the HML-E silencer. Mga2p and Spt23p appear to be a novel class of factors that influence disparate pathways of transcriptional control by chromatin.


Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 160 (3) ◽  
pp. 961-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shan M Hays ◽  
Johanna Swanson ◽  
Eric U Selker

Abstract We have identified and characterized the complete complement of genes encoding the core histones of Neurospora crassa. In addition to the previously identified pair of genes that encode histones H3 and H4 (hH3 and hH4-1), we identified a second histone H4 gene (hH4-2), a divergently transcribed pair of genes that encode H2A and H2B (hH2A and hH2B), a homolog of the F/Z family of H2A variants (hH2Az), a homolog of the H3 variant CSE4 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (hH3v), and a highly diverged H4 variant (hH4v) not described in other species. The hH4-1 and hH4-2 genes, which are 96% identical in their coding regions and encode identical proteins, were inactivated independently. Strains with inactivating mutations in either gene were phenotypically wild type, in terms of growth rates and fertility, but the double mutants were inviable. As expected, we were unable to isolate null alleles of hH2A, hH2B, or hH3. The genomic arrangement of the histone and histone variant genes was determined. hH2Az and the hH3-hH4-1 gene pair are on LG IIR, with hH2Az centromere-proximal to hH3-hH4-1 and hH3 centromere-proximal to hH4-1. hH3v and hH4-2 are on LG IIIR with hH3v centromere-proximal to hH4-2. hH4v is on LG IVR and the hH2A-hH2B pair is located immediately right of the LG VII centromere, with hH2A centromere-proximal to hH2B. Except for the centromere-distal gene in the pairs, all of the histone genes are transcribed toward the centromere. Phylogenetic analysis of the N. crassa histone genes places them in the Euascomycota lineage. In contrast to the general case in eukaryotes, histone genes in euascomycetes are few in number and contain introns. This may be a reflection of the evolution of the RIP (repeat-induced point mutation) and MIP (methylation induced premeiotically) processes that detect sizable duplications and silence associated genes.


1990 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-346
Author(s):  
B.M. Turner ◽  
L. Franchi ◽  
H. Wallace

The four histones of the nucleosome core particle are all subject to enzyme-catalysed, post-translational acetylation at defined lysine residues in their amino-terminal domains. Much circumstantial evidence suggests a role for this process in modifying chromatin structure and function, but detailed mechanisms have not been defined. To facilitate studies on the functional significance of histone acetylation, we have prepared antibodies specific for the acetylated isoforms of histone H4. Because of the extreme evolutionary conservation of H4, these antisera can be applied to a wide variety of organisms and experimental systems. In the present study we have used polytene chromosomes from the salivary glands of larvae of the midge Chironomus to examine the distribution of acetylated H4 in interphase chromatin. By indirect immunofluorescence, antisera to acetylated H4 labeled the four Chironomus chromosomes with reproducible patterns of sharply defined, fluorescent bands. An antiserum to non-acetylated H4 gave a completely different, more-diffuse labelling pattern. Thus, there are defined regions, or islands, in the interphase genome that are enriched in acetylated H4. Double-labelling experiments with two antisera specific for H4 molecules acetylated at different sites, showed that each antiserum gave the same banding pattern. Immunolabelling patterns were not dependent on the pattern of phase-dense bands characteristic of these chromosomes; strongly labelled regions could correspond to phase-dense bands (i.e. condensed chromatin), to interbands or, frequently, to band-interband junctions. Immunogold electron microscopy confirmed the immunofluorescence results and showed further that regions of relatively high labelling could be either transcriptionally active or quiescent, as judged by the presence or absence of ribonucleoprotein particles. Two rapidly transcribed genes on chromosome 4 of Chironomus form characteristic ‘puffs’, the Balbiani rings BRb and BRc. The antiserum to non-acetylated H4 gave diffuse labelling throughout these puffs, demonstrating the continued presence of this histone in these transcriptionally active regions. Antisera to acetylated H4 strongly labelled the boundaries of BRb and BRc, and revealed clearly defined islands of increased H4 acetylation just within the expanded chromatin of the puffs. Labelling within the central region of each puff was much less intense. A similar pattern was observed in puffs on other chromosomes. Thus, increased H4 acetylation is not found throughout actively transcribed chromatin but occurs only at defined sites, possibly in the non-transcribed flanking regions. H4 acetylation is clearly not required for the passage of RNA polymerase through the nucleosome and we speculate that its role may be to facilitate the binding to DNA of polymerases and other proteins prior to the onset of transcription and possibly replication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document