scholarly journals Hsp90 Is Essential for Chl1-Mediated Chromosome Segregation and Sister Chromatid Cohesion

mSphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidhi Khurana ◽  
Sayan Bakshi ◽  
Wahida Tabassum ◽  
Mrinal K. Bhattacharyya ◽  
Sunanda Bhattacharyya
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Hsp90 Inhibitor ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
Functional Loss ◽  
Mechanistic Insight ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Insight Into

ABSTRACT Recent studies have demonstrated that aberrant sister chromatid cohesion causes genomic instability and hence is responsible for the development of a tumor. The Chl1 (chromosome loss 1) protein (homolog of human ChlRl/DDX11 helicase) plays an essential role in the proper segregation of chromosomes during mitosis. The helicase activity of Chl1 is critical for sister chromatid cohesion. Our study demonstrates that Hsp90 interacts with Chl1 and is necessary for its stability. We observe that the Hsp90 nonfunctional condition (temperature-sensitive iG170Dhsp82 strain at restrictive temperature) induces proteasomal degradation of Chl1. We have mapped the domains of Chl1 and identified that the presence of domains II, III, and IV is essential for efficient interaction with Hsp90. We have demonstrated that Hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG (17-allylamino-geldenamycin) causes destabilization of Chl1 protein and enhances significant disruption of sister chromatid cohesion, which is comparable to that observed under the Δchl1 condition. Our study also revealed that 17-AAG treatment causes an increased frequency of chromosome loss to a similar extent as that of the Δchl1 cells. Hsp90 functional loss has been earlier linked to aneuploidy with very poor mechanistic insight. Our result identifies Chl1 as a novel client of Hsp90, which could be further explored to gain mechanistic insight into aneuploidy. IMPORTANCE Recently, Hsp90 functional loss has been linked to aneuploidy; however, until now none of the components of sister chromatid cohesion (SCC) have been demonstrated as the putative clients of Hsp90. In this study, we have established that Chl1, the protein which is involved in maintaining sister chromatid cohesion as well as in preventing chromosome loss, is a direct client of Hsp90. Thus, with understanding of the molecular mechanism, how Hsp90 controls the cohesion machinery might reveal new insights which can be exploited further for attenuation of tumorigenesis.

scholarly journals Mutational Analysis of the Drosophila Sister-Chromatid Cohesion Protein ORD and Its Role in the Maintenance of Centromeric Cohesion

Genetics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 146 (4) ◽  
pp. 1319-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon E Bickel ◽  
Dudley W Wyman ◽  
Terry L Orr-Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Random Segregation ◽  
Kinetochore Function ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

The ord gene is required for proper segregation of all chromosomes in both male and female Drosophila meiosis. Here we describe the isolation of a null ord allele and examine the consequences of ablating ord function. Cytologically, meiotic sister-chromatid cohesion is severely disrupted in flies lacking ORD protein. Moreover, the frequency of missegregation in genetic tests is consistent with random segregation of chromosomes through both meiotic divisions, suggesting that sister cohesion may be completely abolished. However, only a slight decrease in viability is observed for ord null flies, indicating that ORD function is not essential for cohesion during somatic mitosis. In addition, we do not observe perturbation of germ-line mitotic divisions in flies lacking ORD activity. Our analysis of weaker ord alleles suggests that ORD is required for proper centromeric cohesion after arm cohesion is released at the metaphase I/anaphase I transition. Finally, although meiotic cohesion is abolished in the ord null fly, chromosome loss is not appreciable. Therefore, ORD activity appears to promote centromeric cohesion during meiosis II but is not essential for kinetochore function during anaphase.

Fission yeast Pds5 is required for accurate chromosome segregation and for survival after DNA damage or metaphase arrest

2002 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 587-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao-Win Wang ◽  
Rebecca L. Read ◽  
Chris J. Norbury
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

Sister chromatid cohesion, which is established during the S phase of the eukaryotic cell cycle and persists until the onset of anaphase, is essential for the maintenance of genomic integrity. Cohesion requires the multi-protein complex cohesin, as well as a number of accessory proteins including Pds5/BIMD/Spo76. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds5 is an essential protein that localises to chromosomes in a cohesin-dependent manner. Here we describe the characterisation in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe of pds5+, a novel,non-essential orthologue of S. cerevisiae PDS5. The S. pombePds5 protein was localised to punctate nuclear foci in a manner that was dependent on the Rad21 cohesin component. This, together with additional genetic evidence, points towards an involvement of S. pombe Pds5 in sister chromatid cohesion. S. pombe pds5 mutants were hypersensitive to DNA damage and to mitotic metaphase delay, but this sensitivity was apparently not due to precocious loss of sister chromatid cohesion. These cells also suffered increased spontaneous chromosome loss and meiotic defects and their viability was dependent on the spindle checkpoint protein Bub1. Thus, while S. pombe Pds5 has an important cohesin-related role, this differs significantly from that of the equivalent budding yeast protein.

scholarly journals Role of the DDX11 DNA Helicase in Warsaw Breakage Syndrome Etiology

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 2308
Author(s):  
Diana Santos ◽  
Mohammad Mahtab ◽  
Ana Boavida ◽  
Francesca M. Pisani
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Genetic Disorder ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Functional Coupling ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Loop Formation ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

Warsaw breakage syndrome (WABS) is a genetic disorder characterized by sister chromatid cohesion defects, growth retardation, microcephaly, hearing loss and other variable clinical manifestations. WABS is due to biallelic mutations of the gene coding for the super-family 2 DNA helicase DDX11/ChlR1, orthologous to the yeast chromosome loss protein 1 (Chl1). WABS is classified in the group of “cohesinopathies”, rare hereditary diseases that are caused by mutations in genes coding for subunits of the cohesin complex or protein factors having regulatory roles in the sister chromatid cohesion process. In fact, among the cohesion regulators, an important player is DDX11, which is believed to be important for the functional coupling of DNA synthesis and cohesion establishment at the replication forks. Here, we will review what is known about the molecular and cellular functions of human DDX11 and its role in WABS etiopathogenesis, even in light of recent findings on the role of cohesin and its regulator network in promoting chromatin loop formation and regulating chromatin spatial organization.

scholarly journals The acetyltransferase Eco1 elicits cohesin dimerization during S phase

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (22) ◽  
pp. 7554-7565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Di Shi ◽  
Shuaijun Zhao ◽  
Mei-Qing Zuo ◽  
Jingjing Zhang ◽  
Wenya Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Exact Nature ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Lysine Residues

Cohesin is a DNA-associated protein complex that forms a tripartite ring controlling sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome segregation and organization, DNA replication, and gene expression. Sister chromatid cohesion is established by the protein acetyltransferase Eco1, which acetylates two conserved lysine residues on the cohesin subunit Smc3 and thereby ensures correct chromatid separation in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and other eukaryotes. However, the consequence of Eco1-catalyzed cohesin acetylation is unknown, and the exact nature of the cohesive state of chromatids remains controversial. Here, we show that self-interactions of the cohesin subunits Scc1/Rad21 and Scc3 occur in a DNA replication–coupled manner in both yeast and human cells. Using cross-linking MS-based and in vivo disulfide cross-linking analyses of purified cohesin, we show that a subpopulation of cohesin may exist as dimers. Importantly, upon temperature-sensitive and auxin-induced degron-mediated Eco1 depletion, the cohesin-cohesin interactions became significantly compromised, whereas deleting either the deacetylase Hos1 or the Eco1 antagonist Wpl1/Rad61 increased cohesin dimer levels by ∼20%. These results indicate that cohesin dimerizes in the S phase and monomerizes in mitosis, processes that are controlled by Eco1, Wpl1, and Hos1 in the sister chromatid cohesion-dissolution cycle. These findings suggest that cohesin dimerization is controlled by the cohesion cycle and support the notion that a double-ring cohesin model operates in sister chromatid cohesion.

scholarly journals Crystal structure of the cohesin loader Scc2 and insight into cohesinopathy

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (44) ◽  
pp. 12444-12449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sotaro Kikuchi ◽  
Dominika M. Borek ◽  
Zbyszek Otwinowski ◽  
Diana R. Tomchick ◽  
Hongtao Yu
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Adaptor Protein ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Conserved Residues ◽  
Chaetomium Thermophilum ◽  
Important Interaction ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Structural Maintenance Of Chromosomes ◽  
Insight Into

The ring-shaped cohesin complex topologically entraps chromosomes and regulates chromosome segregation, transcription, and DNA repair. The cohesin core consists of the structural maintenance of chromosomes 1 and 3 (Smc1–Smc3) heterodimeric ATPase, the kleisin subunit sister chromatid cohesion 1 (Scc1) that links the two ATPase heads, and the Scc1-bound adaptor protein Scc3. The sister chromatid cohesion 2 and 4 (Scc2–Scc4) complex loads cohesin onto chromosomes. Mutations of cohesin and its regulators, including Scc2, cause human developmental diseases termed cohesinopathy. Here, we report the crystal structure of Chaetomium thermophilum (Ct) Scc2 and examine its interaction with cohesin. Similar to Scc3 and another Scc1-interacting cohesin regulator, precocious dissociation of sisters 5 (Pds5), Scc2 consists mostly of helical repeats that fold into a hook-shaped structure. Scc2 binds to Scc1 through an N-terminal region of Scc1 that overlaps with its Pds5-binding region. Many cohesinopathy mutations target conserved residues in Scc2 and diminish Ct Scc2 binding to Ct Scc1. Pds5 binding to Scc1 weakens the Scc2–Scc1 interaction. Our study defines a functionally important interaction between the kleisin subunit of cohesin and the hook of Scc2. Through competing with Scc2 for Scc1 binding, Pds5 might contribute to the release of Scc2 from loaded cohesin, freeing Scc2 for additional rounds of loading.

scholarly journals Interallelic complementation provides functional evidence for cohesin–cohesin interactions on DNA

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (23) ◽  
pp. 4224-4235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Eng ◽  
Vincent Guacci ◽  
Douglas Koshland
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Single Copy ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Chromosome Architecture ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Interallelic Complementation

The cohesin complex (Mcd1p, Smc1p, Smc3p, and Scc3p) has multiple roles in chromosome architecture, such as promoting sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, DNA repair, and transcriptional regulation. The prevailing embrace model for sister chromatid cohesion posits that a single cohesin complex entraps both sister chromatids. We report interallelic complementation between pairs of nonfunctional mcd1 alleles (mcd1-1 and mcd1-Q266) or smc3 alleles (smc3-42 and smc3-K113R). Cells bearing individual mcd1 or smc3 mutant alleles are inviable and defective for both sister chromatid cohesion and condensation. However, cells coexpressing two defective mcd1 or two defective smc3 alleles are viable and have cohesion and condensation. Because cohesin contains only a single copy of Smc3p or Mcd1p, these examples of interallelic complementation must result from interplay or communication between the two defective cohesin complexes, each harboring one of the mutant allele products. Neither mcd1-1p nor smc3-42p is bound to chromosomes when expressed individually at its restrictive temperature. However, their chromosome binding is restored when they are coexpressed with their chromosome-bound interallelic complementing partner. Our results support a mechanism by which multiple cohesin complexes interact on DNA to mediate cohesion and condensation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document