scholarly journals What causes geomagnetic activity during sunspot minimum?

2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 1033-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Kirov ◽  
S. Asenovski ◽  
K. Georgieva ◽  
V. N. Obridko
1958 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 332-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott E. Forbush

The amplitude of the average 27-day wave in cosmic ray intensity, at Huancayo, Peru, and its phase relative to that for the 27-day wave in international magnetic character figure (ICF) is determined from results of harmonic analysis of data for each of 246 intervals (or solar rotations) of 27 days. From these data, the variability of which is essential for tests of statistical significance, the amplitude of the average 27-day wave in cosmic ray intensity and its phase relative to that in geomagnetic activity is determined for each of three groups of solar rotations selected according to the average of the amplitudes of the 27-day waves in magnetic activity. A fourth group contained only 27-day intervals in which large cosmic ray decreases occurred. Relative to that in magnetic activity, the phase of the 27-day wave in cosmic ray intensity is found for the averages, to be the same for the four groups.The maxima of the average cosmic ray waves occur about 1·5 days after the minima of the corresponding waves in ICF. In general, the amplitude of the average 27-day wave in cosmic ray intensity, in the co-ordinate system in which its phase is relative to that of the 27-day wave in ICF tends to be greater for the selected groups of rotations with larger average ICF amplitudes. For most years near sunspot minimum the amplitude of the 27-day cosmic ray wave does not differ significantly from zero.Bartels found for 27-day waves in ICF the effective number of statistically independent 27-day waves for N successive solar rotations to be N/3; the number found for cosmic ray intensity is N/2. Thus, on the average the 27-day recurrence tendency is less for cosmic ray intensity than for magnetic activity.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Savel'evich Fal'kovich ◽  
M. R. Olyak ◽  
Nikolai Nikolaevich Kalinichenko ◽  
I. N. Bubnov

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola De Michelis ◽  
Giuseppe Consolini ◽  
Alessio Pignalberi ◽  
Roberta Tozzi ◽  
Igino Coco ◽  
...  

AbstractThe present work focuses on the analysis of the scaling features of electron density fluctuations in the mid- and high-latitude topside ionosphere under different conditions of geomagnetic activity. The aim is to understand whether it is possible to identify a proxy that may provide information on the properties of electron density fluctuations and on the possible physical mechanisms at their origin, as for instance, turbulence phenomena. So, we selected about 4 years (April 2014–February 2018) of 1 Hz electron density measurements recorded on-board ESA Swarm A satellite. Using the Auroral Electrojet (AE) index, we identified two different geomagnetic conditions: quiet (AE < 50 nT) and active (AE > 300 nT). For both datasets, we evaluated the first- and second-order scaling exponents and an intermittency coefficient associated with the electron density fluctuations. Then, the joint probability distribution between each of these quantities and the rate of change of electron density index was also evaluated. We identified two families of plasma density fluctuations characterized by different mean values of both the scaling exponents and the considered ionospheric index, suggesting that different mechanisms (instabilities/turbulent processes) can be responsible for the observed scaling features. Furthermore, a clear different localization of the two families in the magnetic latitude—magnetic local time plane is found and its dependence on geomagnetic activity levels is analyzed. These results may well have a bearing about the capability of recognizing the turbulent character of irregularities using a typical ionospheric plasma irregularity index as a proxy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document