scholarly journals Implementing health information exchange for public health reporting: a comparison of decision and risk management of three regional health information organizations in New York state

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (e1) ◽  
pp. e173-e177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew B Phillips ◽  
Rosalind V Wilson ◽  
Rainu Kaushal ◽  
Jacqueline A Merrill ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. 861-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kaushal ◽  
J.R. Vest ◽  
P. Kierkegaard

SummaryBackground: Health information exchange (HIE) has the potential to improve the quality of health-care by enabling providers with better access to patient information from multiple sources at the point of care. However, HIE efforts have historically been difficult to establish in the US and the failure rates of organizations created to foster HIE have been high.Objectives: We sought to better understand how RHIO-based HIE systems were used in practice and the challenges care practitioners face using them. The objective of our study were to so investigate how HIE can better meet the needs of care practitioners.Methods: We performed a multiple-case study using qualitative methods in three communities in New York State. We conducted interviews onsite and by telephone with HIE users and non-users and observed the workflows of healthcare professionals at multiple healthcare organizations participating in a local HIE effort in New York State.Results: The empirical data analysis suggests that challenges still remain in increasing provider usage, optimizing HIE implementations and connecting HIE systems across geographic regions. Important determinants of system usage and perceived value includes users experienced level of available information and the fit of use for physician workflows.Conclusions: Challenges still remain in increasing provider adoption, optimizing HIE implementations, and demonstrating value. The inability to find information reduced usage of HIE. Healthcare organizations, HIE facilitating organizations, and states can help support HIE adoption by ensuring patient information is accessible to providers through increasing patient consents, fostering broader participation, and by ensuring systems are usable.Citation: Kierkegaard P, Kaushal R, Vest JR. How could health information exchange better meet the needs of care practitioners? Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 861–877http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2014-06-RA-0055


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1156-1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika L. Abramson ◽  
Sandra McGinnis ◽  
Alison Edwards ◽  
Dayna M. Maniccia ◽  
Jean Moore ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey Hoferka ◽  
Ivan Handle ◽  
Steven Linthicum ◽  
Dejan Jovanov ◽  
William Trick ◽  
...  

In support of Meaningful Use public health reporting, health departments are expanding their capacity to receive electronic health data. The Illinois Department of Health is working with the Illinois Health Information Exchange to build services and applications to improve the quality and utility of surveillance data. The Master Patient Index is an innovative component of the technology that will integrate public health data across surveillance systems. This presentation will cover the application of the MPI to ambulatory syndromic surveillance as well as other surveillance systems and highlight potential use cases.


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-47
Author(s):  
Saira N Haque ◽  
Heather Territo ◽  
Robert Bailey ◽  
Barbara Massoudi ◽  
Ross Loomis ◽  
...  

Objective: To calculate average savings of using health information exchange (HIE) for demographic and treatment requests for chlamydia and gonorrhoea in Western New York, specifically the Erie County Department of Health and its catchment area. Method: We conducted a mixed-method case study. Qualitative methods included interviews, document review, and workflow mapping, which were used as the inputs to identify time savings. Case rates, time savings, and salary averages were used to calculate average savings. Results: The avoided demographic information requests resulted in time and money savings (range of USD$2312–USD$4624 for chlamydia and USD$809–USD$1512 for gonorrhoea) as did avoided treatment requests (range of USD$671–USD$2803 for chlamydia and USD$981–USD$1635 for gonorrhoea). Discussion: HIE supported sexually transmitted infection (STI) treatment by making it easier for public health staff to identify and act upon STI diagnoses. Availability of information online resulted in less reliance on provider offices for demographic and treatment information. Conclusion: Results indicated that using HIE to support treatment and management of STIs can save public health staff time spent on obtaining demographic and treatment information. Other public health departments could use HIE for this and other types of disease surveillance activities. Considering public health needs in HIE development and use can improve efficiency of public health services and enhance effectiveness of activities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document