The immunogenicity of anti-TNF therapy in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 72 (12) ◽  
pp. 1947-1955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Garcês ◽  
Jocelyne Demengeot ◽  
Elizabeth Benito-Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Drug Response ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

BackgroundImmunogenicity of aTNFs is one of the mechanisms behind treatment failure.ObjectiveTo assess the effect of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) on drug response to infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept, and the effect of immunosuppression on ADA detection, in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Spondyloarthritis, Psoriasis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.Data sourcesPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, article reference lists (through August 19 2012).Study selectionOut of 2082 studies, 17 were used in the meta-analysis (1RCT; 16 observational studies).Data extractionTwo reviewers extracted data. Risk ratios (RR), 95% CI, using random-effect models, sensitivity analysis, meta-regressions and Egger's test were calculated.Data synthesisOf 865 patients, ADA against infliximab or adalimumab reduced drug response rate by 68% (RR=0.68, 95% CI=0.12 to 0.36), an effect attenuated by concomitant methotrexate (MTX): <74% MTX+: RR=0.23, 95% CI=0.15 to 0.36; ≥74% MTX+: RR=0.32, 95% CI=0.22 to 0.48. Anti-etanercept antibodies were not detected. Of 936 patients, concomitant MTX or azathioprine/mercaptopurine reduced ADA frequency by 47% (RR=0.53, 95% CI=0.42 to 0.67), particularly when ADA were assessed by RIA (RR=0.36, 95% CI=0.23 to 0.55) compared with ELISA (RR=0.63, 95% CI=0.53 to 0.74).ConclusionsADA reduces drug response, an effect that can be attenuated by concomitant immunosuppression, which reduces ADA frequency. Drug immunogenicity should be considered for the management of patients receiving biological therapies.

Systematic Review with Meta-analysis: The Impact of Co-occurring Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases on the Disease Course of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Attauabi ◽  
Mirabella Zhao ◽  
Flemming Bendtsen ◽  
Johan Burisch
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background and Aims Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are at risk of developing a variety of other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The influence of co-occurring IMIDs on the disease course of IBD remains unknown. The aim of this study was therefore to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of IMIDs on phenotypic presentation and outcome in patients with IBD. Methods PubMed and Embase were searched from their earliest records through December 2018 and updated in October 2019 for studies reporting proportions or ratios of IBD-related disease outcomes in patients with and without co-occurring IMIDs. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate summary proportions and risks of the main outcomes. PRISMA guidelines were used, and study quality was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results A total of 93 studies were identified, comprising 16,064 IBD patients with co-occurring IMIDs and 3,451,414 IBD patients without IMIDs. Patients with IBD and co-occurring IMIDs were at increased risk of having extensive colitis or pancolitis (risk ratio, 1.38; 95% Cl, 1.25–1.52; P &lt; 0.01, I2 = 86%) and receiving IBD-related surgeries (risk ratio, 1.17; 95% Cl, 1.01–1.36; P = 0.03; I2 = 85%) compared with patients without IMIDs. Co-occurrence of IMIDs other than primary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with IBD was associated with an increased risk of receiving immunomodulators (risk ratio, 1.15; 95% Cl, 1.06–1.24; P &lt; 0.01; I2 = 60%) and biologic therapies (risk ratio, 1.19; 95% Cl, 1.08–1.32; P &lt; 0.01; I2 = 53%). Conclusion This meta-analysis found that the presence of co-occurring IMIDs influences the disease course of IBD, including an increased risk of surgery and its phenotypical expression.

Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding on Treatment With Statin Alone or With Concomitant Administration of Warfarin: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 5.3 Million Participants

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110497
Author(s):  
Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula ◽  
Kota Vidyasaga ◽  
Eyob Alemayehu Gebreyohannes ◽  
Wubshet Tesfaye
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Concomitant Administration ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Statin Monotherapy ◽  
Statin Use

Objective: This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) with statin monotherapy or with concomitant warfarin use. Data Sources: PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE (via Scopus) were searched for observational studies that reported the risk of GIB in adults on statin therapy or with concomitant warfarin use until August 28, 2021. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Observational studies evaluating the risk of GIB in adults (age >18 years) on statin medication or concomitant use with warfarin were included. Data Synthesis: In all, 14 studies with a total of 5 235 123 participants, reporting 48 677 GIB events (43 734 from statin users and 4943 from users of statin combined with warfarin), were included in the analyses. The pooled analysis revealed no difference in the risk of GIB with statin monotherapy (relative risk [RR]: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.42-1.02) or concomitant statin + warfarin use (RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.91-1.02). Prior use of statin was not associated with GIB risk (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.63-1.22), whereas a shorter duration of statin use (<5 years) was associated with a lower risk of GIB (RR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.18-0.97). Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This analysis provides strong evidence on the association between statin use (with/without warfarin) and risk of GIB. Conclusion: Statin alone or combined with warfarin was not significantly associated with either an increased or decreased risk of GIB. The GIB risk was significantly lower when statins were used for a short duration (<5 years). The putative relationship between statins and GIB in warfarin users warrant further investigation.

scholarly journals P261 Systematic review with meta-analysis: The impact of concomitant immune-mediated diseases on the disease course of inflammatory bowel disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S280-S281
Author(s):  
M Attauabi ◽  
M Zhao ◽  
F Bendtsen ◽  
J Burisch
Keyword(s):  
Biologic Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Multidisciplinary Care ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Several studies have shown an association between inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] and immune-mediated diseases [IMIDs], but data on the impact of co-occurring IMIDs on IBD course are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of co-occurring IMIDs on IBD phenotype and disease course. Methods PubMed and EMBASE were searched from database inception through December 2018 and updated in October 2019 for studies reporting prevalences or odds, risks or hazard ratios of IBD-related disease outcomes in patients with and without co-existing IMIDs. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate summary prevalences and risks of the outcomes which included disease extension, IBD-related surgery and hospitalisation, malignancy, mortality and need of medication (biologic therapy, steroids and immunomodulators). IMIDs were stratified into primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC] and ‘IMIDs other than PSC’. Results A total of 93 studies comprising 14,307 IBD patients with IMIDs and 3,409,914 IBD patients without IMIDs were included in the study. Summary risks and prevalences with 95% confidence intervals for each outcome are presented in figures 1 and 2, respectively. The following results are all significant (p &lt; 0.05). Compared with patients without co-occurring IMIDs, patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] and co-occurring IMIDs other than PSC more frequently received immunomodulators and steroids, and patients with Crohn’s disease [CD] and concomitant IMIDs other than PSC more often received biologic therapy. UC patients with co-existing IMIDs other than PSC more often underwent IBD-related surgery, while patients with CD and PSC received fewer surgeries. In addition, UC patients with co-occurring PSC were at increased risk for having extensive colitis, pancolitis, and malignancies. Patients with UC and PSC had a higher mortality rate, but no difference was found among patients with IMIDs other than PSC. PSC did not influence hospitalisation rates among IBD patients. Conclusion This meta-analysis found that IBD patients with co-existing IMIDs have a different disease course than patients without concomitant IMIDs. This study emphasises the importance of multidisciplinary care of IBD and that physicians caring for IBD patients need to be aware of IMIDs as a prognostic factor.

Blinding Strategies in Dry Needling Trials: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (11) ◽  
pp. 1461-1480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicity A Braithwaite ◽  
Julie L Walters ◽  
Lok Sze Katrina Li ◽  
G Lorimer Moseley ◽  
Marie T Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cognitive Strategies ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Dry Needling ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Methodological Bias ◽  
Tactile Sensations ◽  
Effectiveness Data

Abstract Background Blinding of participants and therapists in trials of physical interventions is a significant and ongoing challenge. There is no widely accepted sham protocol for dry needling. Purpose The purpose of this review was to summarize the effectiveness and limitations of blinding strategies and types of shams that have been used in dry needling trials. Data Sources Twelve databases were searched from inception to February 2016. Study Selection Trials that compared active dry needling with a sham that simulated dry needling were included. Data Extraction The main domains of data extraction were participant/therapist details, intervention details, blinding strategies, blinding assessment outcomes, and key conclusions of authors. Reported blinding strategies and sham types were synthesized descriptively, with available blinding effectiveness data synthesized using a chance-corrected measurement of blinding (blinding index). Data Synthesis The search identified 4894 individual publications with 27 trials eligible for inclusion. In 22 trials, risk of methodological bias was high or unclear. Across trials, blinding strategies and sham types were heterogeneous. Notably, no trials attempted therapist blinding. Sham protocols have focused on participant blinding using strategies related to group standardization and simulation of tactile sensations. There has been little attention given to the other senses or cognitive strategies to enhance intervention credibility. Nonpenetrating sham types may provide effective participant blinding. Limitations Trials were clinically and methodologically diverse, which limited the comparability of blinding effectiveness across trials. Reported blinding evaluations had a high risk of chance findings with power clearly achieved in only 1 trial. Conclusions Evidence-based consensus on a sham protocol for dry needling is required. Recommendations provided in this review may be used to develop sham protocols so that future protocols are more consistent and potentially more effective.

Can We Extrapolate Data from One Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease to Another One?

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Magro ◽  
Rosa Coelho ◽  
Armando Peixoto
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Analytical Techniques ◽  
Approval Process ◽  
Homogeneous Population ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Innovator Product ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases share several pathogenic pathways and this pushes sometimes to extrapolate from one disease or indication to others. A biosimilar can be defined as a biotherapeutic product which is similar in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy to an already licensed reference biotherapeutic product. We review the substrate for extrapolation, the current approval process for biosimilars and the pioneering studies on biosimilars performed in rheumatoid arthritis patients. A biosimilar has the same amino acid sequence as its innovator product. However, post-translational modifications can occur and the current analytical techniques do not allow the final structure. To test the efficacy in one indication, a homogeneous population should be chosen and immunogenicity features are essential in switching and interchangeability. CT-P13 (Remsima™; Inflectra™) is a biosimilar of reference infliximab (Remicade®). It meets most of the requirements for extrapolation. Nevertheless, in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) we need more studies to confirm the postulates of extrapolation from rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis to IBD. Furthermore, an effective pharmacovigilance schedule is mandatory to look for immunogenicity and side effects.

scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes With Levothyroxine Treatment in Euthyroid Women With Thyroid Autoimmunity

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 1009-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Sun ◽  
Ningning Hou ◽  
Hongsheng Wang ◽  
Lin Ma ◽  
Jinhong Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Thyroid Autoimmunity ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Definitive Evidence ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy ◽  
Levothyroxine Treatment

Abstract Context Thyroid autoimmunity (TAI), the most common cause of (sub)clinical hypothyroidism, is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The benefits of levothyroxine (LT4) intervention in women with TAI remain controversial. Objective The purpose of this analysis is to determine the effect of LT4 on pregnancy outcomes in euthyroid women with TAI. Data sources Databases were searched up to May 2019. Study selection Randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and retrospective studies that reported effects of LT4 administration on pregnancy outcomes in euthyroid women with TAI were screened. Data extraction Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted independently by 2 researchers. Conflicts were settled by a third researcher. Data synthesis Six trials comprising 2249 women were included. Overall, no beneficial effect on pregnancy outcomes was observed with LT4 supplementation. For women with individualized initial LT4 dosages, the risk of miscarriage decreased (relative risk [RR] 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41-0.93, I2 = 28%); there was no difference among women with fixed LT4 dosages (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.74-1.24, I2 = 0%). Women who initiated LT4 treatment in early pregnancy had a significantly lower preterm birth rate (RR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.92, I2 = 0%) than those who received no treatment or placebo. No improvement was observed among women who initiated treatment before conception (RR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.71-1.84, I2 = 0%). Conclusion No definitive evidence showed improvement of pregnancy outcomes with LT4 supplementation in euthyroid women with TAI. However, therapeutic strategies, especially dosages and initial times of intervention, may be of great importance. Additional large RCTs are needed in the future.

scholarly journals IBD considerations in spondyloarthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 1759720X2093941
Author(s):  
Caroline Di Jiang ◽  
Tim Raine
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Drug Dosing ◽  
Inflammatory Conditions ◽  
Gastrointestinal Pathology ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Form Part ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Gastrointestinal Inflammation ◽  
The Difference

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) may be regarded a family of auto-inflammatory conditions with inflammation focused on the joints. These form part of a wider family of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, which include inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). These conditions share common elements of pathophysiology and it is perhaps unsurprising, therefore, that individuals with SpA frequently manifest gastrointestinal inflammation, to which the physician managing the patient with SpA must be alert. In this article, we review the shared epidemiology and pathophysiology of these conditions, before discussing approaches to diagnosis and management of inflammatory gastrointestinal pathology in patients seen in rheumatology clinics. In particular, we discuss the difference between non-specific gastrointestinal inflammation commonly described in this patient group and the more specific diagnosis of Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. We describe the appropriate diagnostic workup for patients suspected of having IBD. In addition, we discuss how a diagnosis of IBD can inform treatment selection, highlighting important differences in treatment choice, drug dosing, monitoring and drug safety for this particular comorbid patient population.

scholarly journals Belgian IBD Research Group [BIRD] Position Statement 2019 on the Use of Adalimumab Biosimilars in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 680-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaël Somers ◽  
Peter Bossuyt ◽  
Marc Ferrante ◽  
Harald Peeters ◽  
Filip Baert
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Research Group ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Position Statement ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract The emergence of biosimilars is generally considered as an opportunity to guarantee accessibility to affordable treatments and to enhance financial sustainability of national health systems. Since 2017, five biosimilars of adalimumab were approved by the European Medicines Agency [EMA] for use in inflammatory bowel disease: ABP 510, SB5, GP2017, FKB327, and MSB11022. In this position statement, the available efficacy and safety data of the different adalimumab biosimilars in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases are summarised. Furthermore, the Belgian IBD research group [BIRD] formulates statements concerning the use of adalimumab biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease.

scholarly journals P795 Risk of incident paradoxical immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases treated with anti-TNF therapies: a nationwide Danish cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S625-S625
Author(s):  
D WARD ◽  
S Gørtz ◽  
N Nyboe Andersen ◽  
J Kirchgesner ◽  
T Jess
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases ◽  
Hidradenitis Suppurativa ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Lag Period ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) has a central role in the pathophysiology of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, there have been case reports of patients receiving an anti-TNF therapy for one IMID subsequently developing a second IMID. We conducted a nationwide cohort study investigating the risk of incident IMID following anti-TNF exposure in patients with IBD in Denmark. Methods We followed patients with IBD from 1 January 2005 or date of IBD diagnosis (whichever occurred last) to an outcome event including incident diagnosis of hidradenitis suppurativa, arthropathic psoriasis, other forms of psoriasis, or rheumatoid arthritis; or emigration, death or 31 December 2018 (whichever occurred first). Patients were defined as exposed after a 3-month lag period from first anti-TNF infusion throughout follow-up, analogous to an intention-to-treat design. The lag period was censored from analyses to avoid including incipient IMIDs, unlikely to be caused by newly initiated anti-TNF treatment. We excluded patients initiating anti-TNF or with an outcome diagnosis before either 1 January 2005 or IBD diagnosis. We used Cox regression models with age as the underlying timescale, and sex, type of IBD (Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis), and calendar period of IBD diagnosis (in 5 year groups) as strata to estimate hazard ratios for each outcome, comparing anti-TNF users and non-users. Results Incidence rates (and 95% confidence intervals [CI]) as events per 100 000 person-years among anti-TNF users and non-users were, respectively, 138 (109–173) and 25.6 (22.0–29.7) for hidradenitis suppurativa, 26.3 (15.6–44.4) and 7.81 (5.95–10.2) for arthropathic psoriasis, 1177 (1085–1277) and 204 (121–189) for other forms of psoriasis, and 152 (121–189) and 95.6 (88.5–103) for rheumatoid arthritis. Hazard ratios (and 95% C.I.) were increased for hidradenitis suppurativa 2.91 (2.15–3.94), arthropathic psoriasis 2.62 (1.40–4.93), other forms of psoriasis 4.76 (4.27–5.31), and rheumatoid arthritis 2.35 (1.83–3.01). Conclusion The results indicate that patients with IBD receiving anti-TNF have an increased risk of IMIDs. An almost 5-fold increase in the risk of psoriasis is consistent with previous reports of psoriasiform skin lesions related to anti-TNF use. However, as more severe IBD is likely to be associated with both initiating anti-TNF and the incidence of other inflammatory diseases, the results are subject to confounding by indication. Thus, these results should be considered preliminary, and we plan to further address confounding by using propensity score methods.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document