scholarly journals OP0237 Lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% for treatment of dry eye disease: combined evidence from 5 randomized controlled trials

Author(s):  
C Baudouin ◽  
M Darvish-Zargar ◽  
EJ Holland ◽  
CC Chan ◽  
KK Nichols ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly K Nichols ◽  
Eric D Donnenfeld ◽  
Paul M Karpecki ◽  
John A Hovanesian ◽  
Aparna Raychaudhuri ◽  
...  

Purpose: Characterize the safety and tolerability of lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% for the treatment of dry eye disease. Methods: Pooled data from five randomized controlled trials were analyzed. Key inclusion criteria were adults with dry eye disease (Schirmer tear test score ⩾1 and ⩽10 mm, eye dryness score ⩾40 (visual analog scale 0–100), corneal staining score ⩾2.0 (0–4 scale)). Participants were randomized to lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% or placebo twice daily for 84 or 360 days. Treatment-emergent adverse events and drop comfort scores were assessed. Results: Overall, 2464 participants (lifitegrast, n = 1287; placebo, n = 1177) were included. Ocular treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in >5% in either group were instillation site irritation (lifitegrast, 15.2%; placebo, 2.8%), instillation site reaction (lifitegrast, 12.3%; placebo, 2.3%), and instillation site pain (lifitegrast, 9.8%; placebo, 2.1%); the most common (> 5%) nonocular treatment-emergent adverse event was dysgeusia (lifitegrast, 14.5%; placebo, 0.3%). The majority of treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. Discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 7.0% (lifitegrast) versus 2.6% (placebo) of participants (ocular: 5.5% vs 1.5%; nonocular: 1.9% vs 1.1%). Drop comfort scores with lifitegrast improved within 3 min of instillation and the score at 3 min improved across visits (12-week trials (both eyes, day 84 vs 0): 2.0 vs 3.3; SONATA (day 360 vs 0): right eye, 1.2 vs 1.7; left eye, 1.2 vs 1.8). Conclusion: Lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% appeared to be safe and well tolerated for the treatment of dry eye disease. Drop comfort with lifitegrast improved within 3 min of instillation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1759-1765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Holland ◽  
Walter O. Whitley ◽  
Kenneth Sall ◽  
Stephen S. Lane ◽  
Aparna Raychaudhuri ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 1664-1674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Fogagnolo ◽  
Eleonora Favuzza ◽  
Daniele Marchina ◽  
Michela Cennamo ◽  
Roberto Vignapiano ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 546-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Yves Robert ◽  
Béatrice Cochener ◽  
Mourad Amrane ◽  
Dahlia Ismail ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Garrigue ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 840-855
Author(s):  
Khayam Naderi ◽  
Jack Gormley ◽  
David O’Brart

Aim To review published literature concerning cataract surgery and dry eye disease (DED). Methods A search was undertaken using the following: PubMed (all years), Web of Science (all years), Ovid MEDLINE(R) (1946 to 12 December 2019), Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily Update 10 December 2019, MEDLINE and MEDLINE non-indexed items, Embase (1974–2019, week 49), Ovid MEDLINE (R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily (1946 to 12 December 2019), CENTRAL (including Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; Cochrane Library: Issue 12 of 12 December 2019), metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) ( www.controlled-trials.com ), ClinicalTrials.gov ( www.clinicaltrial.gov ) and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ( www.who.int/ictrp/search/en ). Search terms included ‘cataract surgery’, ‘phacoemulsification’ and ‘cataract extraction’, combined with ‘dry eyes’ and ‘ocular surface’. Relevant in-article references not returned in our searches were also considered. Results Publications identified included systematic reviews, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case series and laboratory-based studies. Published data highlighting the burden of DED both prior and following cataract surgery were reviewed as well as studies highlighting the effects of cataract surgery on the ocular surface, intra-operative measures to reduce deleterious effects on the ocular surface and current evidence on the management options of post-operative DED. Conclusions DED is common and can be exacerbated by cataract surgery. Ophthalmologists need to assess for pre-existing DED and instigate treatment before surgery; be aware of reduced accuracy of measurements for surgical planning in the presence of DED; limit intra-operative surgical factors damaging to the ocular surface; and consider management to reduce DED post-operatively.


Author(s):  
Maneesha Sethi ◽  
Amarjeet Singh Bali ◽  
P. Sadhotra

Background: Dry eye is a multifactorial disease particularly prevalent in Asia for which there are several treatments. Among anti-inflammatory treatment, cyclosporine 0.05% is preferred therapy. Our study evaluated effects of cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic solution on the diagnostic tools of dry eye.Material & Methods: A prospective study was carried out in ophthalmological outpatient department of ASCOMS and Hospital. Total 60 patients of dry eye disease who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were treated with cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic solution twice a day. The diagnostic parameters of dry eye were assessed at baseline, at month 1 and 3. Patients underwent Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score, Schirmer’s test, Tear film break up time (TBUT) .Results: After three months, mean OSDI score was significantly improved (p < 0.001). There was significant improvement in mean Schirmer score (p < 0.001). Baseline TBUT also increased significantly (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic solution has significant effect on diagnostic parameters of dry eye disease.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document