AB1458-HPR Work participation of people with musculoskeletal disorders in ireland: a qualitative multi-stakeholder analysis

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: (1) Develop a concept map of ideas from diverse stakeholders on how to best improve training programs. (2) Assess the degree of consensus amongst stakeholders regarding importance and feasibility. (3) Identify which ideas are both important and feasible to inform policy and curricular interventions. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Concept mapping is a 4 step approach to data gathering and analysis. (1) Stakeholders [pediatricians (peds), MH professionals (MHPs), trainees, parents] were recruited to brainstorm ideas in response to this prompt: “To prepare future pediatricians for their role in caring for children and adolescents with mental and behavioral health conditions, residency training needs to...”. (2) Content analysis was used to edit and synthesize ideas. (3) A subgroup of stakeholders sorted ideas into groups and rated for importance and feasibility. (4) A large group of anonymous participants rated ideas for importance and feasibility. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis grouped ideas into clusters. Average importance and feasibility were calculated for each cluster and were compared statistically in each cluster and between subgroups. Bivariate plots were created to show the relative importance and feasibility of each idea. The “Go-Zone” is where statements are feasible and important and can drive action planning. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Content analysis was applied to 497 ideas resulting in 99 that were sorted by 40 stakeholders and resulted in 7 clusters: Modalities, Prioritization of MH, Systems-Based, Self-Awareness/Relationship Building, Clinical Assessment, Treatment, and Diagnosis Specific Skills. In total, 216 participants rated statements for importance, 209 for feasibility: 17% MHPs, 82% peds, 55% trainees. There was little correlation between importance and feasibility for each cluster. Compared with peds, MHPs rated Modalities, and Prioritization of MH higher in importance and Prioritization of MH as more feasible, but Treatment less feasible. Trainees rated 5 of 7 clusters higher in importance and all clusters more feasible than established practitioners. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Statements deemed feasible and important should drive policy changes and curricular development. Innovation is needed to make important ideas more feasible. Differences between importance and feasibility in each cluster and between stakeholders need to be addressed to help training programs evolve.

Download Full-text

Can you Read This? Legibility and Hospital Records: A Multi-Stakeholder Analysis

Clinical Risk ◽

10.1258/cr.2012.011065 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 18 (3) ◽

pp. 95-98 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Susan Murray ◽

Geraldine Boylan ◽

Siun O'Flynn ◽

Colm O'Tuathaigh ◽

Kieran Doran

Keyword(s):

Stakeholder Analysis ◽

Hospital Records ◽

Multi Stakeholder

Download Full-text

Requirements of a new communication technology for handover and the escalation of patient care: a multi-stakeholder analysis

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice ◽

10.1111/jep.12186 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 20 (4) ◽

pp. 486-497 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Maximilian J. Johnston ◽

Dominic King ◽

Sonal Arora ◽

Kerri Cooper ◽

Neha Aparajita Panda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Patient Care ◽

Communication Technology ◽

Stakeholder Analysis ◽

Multi Stakeholder

Download Full-text

Corporate Social Performance: A multi-Stakeholder Analysis of Indonesian Energy Companies’ Sustainability Report

International Journal of Trade Economics and Finance ◽

10.18178/ijtef.2018.9.3.601 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 9 (3) ◽

pp. 125-130

Author(s):

Amelia Kurniawati ◽

◽

TMA Ari Samadhi ◽

Iwan Inrawan Wiratmadja ◽

Indryati Sunaryo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Corporate Social Performance ◽

Social Performance ◽

Stakeholder Analysis ◽

Multi Stakeholder ◽

Corporate Social ◽

Energy Companies ◽

Sustainability Report

Download Full-text

Perspectives on computing ethics: a multi-stakeholder analysis

Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society ◽

10.1108/jices-12-2020-0127 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽

Author(s):

Damian Gordon ◽

Ioannis Stavrakakis ◽

J. Paul Gibson ◽

Brendan Tierney ◽

Anna Becevel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stakeholder Analysis ◽

Group Analysis ◽

Daily Basis ◽

Data Sets ◽

Ethical Challenges ◽

Content Type ◽

Ict Industry ◽

Multi Stakeholder ◽

The Impact ◽

Industry Professionals

Purpose Computing ethics represents a long established, yet rapidly evolving, discipline that grows in complexity and scope on a near-daily basis. Therefore, to help understand some of that scope it is essential to incorporate a range of perspectives, from a range of stakeholders, on current and emerging ethical challenges associated with computer technology. This study aims to achieve this by using, a three-pronged, stakeholder analysis of Computer Science academics, ICT industry professionals, and citizen groups was undertaken to explore what they consider to be crucial computing ethics concerns. The overlap between these stakeholder groups are explored, as well as whether their concerns are reflected in the existing literature. Design/methodology/approach Data collection was performed using focus groups, and the data was analysed using a thematic analysis. The data was also analysed to determine if there were overlaps between the literature and the stakeholders’ concerns and attitudes towards computing ethics. Findings The results of the focus group analysis show a mixture of overlapping concerns between the different groups, as well as some concerns that are unique to each of the specific groups. All groups stressed the importance of data as a key topic in computing ethics. This includes concerns around the accuracy, completeness and representativeness of data sets used to develop computing applications. Academics were concerned with the best ways to teach computing ethics to university students. Industry professionals believed that a lack of diversity in software teams resulted in important questions not being asked during design and development. Citizens discussed at length the negative and unexpected impacts of social media applications. These are all topics that have gained broad coverage in the literature. Social implications In recent years, the impact of ICT on society and the environment at large has grown tremendously. From this fast-paced growth, a myriad of ethical concerns have arisen. The analysis aims to shed light on what a diverse group of stakeholders consider the most important social impacts of technology and whether these concerns are reflected in the literature on computing ethics. The outcomes of this analysis will form the basis for new teaching content that will be developed in future to help illuminate and address these concerns. Originality/value The multi-stakeholder analysis provides individual and differing perspectives on the issues related to the rapidly evolving discipline of computing ethics.

Download Full-text

The politics and poetics of migrant narratives

European Journal of Cultural Studies ◽

10.1177/1367549419896367 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 23 (5) ◽

pp. 679-697

Author(s):

Koen Leurs ◽

Irati Agirreazkuenaga ◽

Kevin Smets ◽

Melis Mevsimler

Keyword(s):

Research Agenda ◽

Stakeholder Analysis ◽

Special Issue ◽

Relational Approach ◽

Media Technologies ◽

Humanitarian Organizations ◽

The Media ◽

And Migration ◽

Multi Stakeholder ◽

Media Power

Serving as the introduction to the special issue on ‘Migrant narratives’, this article proposes a multi-perspectival and multi-stakeholder analysis of how migration is narrated in the media in the last decade. This research agenda is developed by focussing on groups of actors that are commonly studied in isolation from each other: (1) migrants, (2) media professionals such as journalists and spokespersons from humanitarian organizations, (3) governments and corporations and (4) artists and activists. We take a relational approach to recognize how media power is articulated alongside a spectrum of more top-down and more bottom-up perspectives, through specific formats, genres and styles within and against larger frameworks of governmentality. Taken together, the poetics and politics of migrant narratives demand attention respectively for how stakeholders variously aesthetically present and politically represent migration. The opportunities, challenges, problems and commitments observed among the four groups of actors also provide the means to rethink our practice and responsibilities as media and migration scholars contributing to decentring media technologies and re-humanizing migrants.

Download Full-text