scholarly journals OP0008 DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS DISEASE ACTIVITY SCORE WHEN PATIENT GLOBAL ASSESSMENT IS UNAVAILABLE

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
A. Ortolan ◽  
S. Ramiro ◽  
F. A. Van Gaalen ◽  
T. K. Kvien ◽  
R. B. M. Landewé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Patient Global Assessment ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Low Disease Activity

Background:Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is a composite index measuring disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). It includes questions from the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Patient Global Assessment (PGA), and inflammation biomarkers. However, ASDAS calculation is not always possible because PGA is sometimes not collected.Objectives:To develop an alternative ASDAS to be used in research settings when PGA is unavailable.Methods:Longitudinal data from 4 axSpA cohorts and 2 RCTs were combined. Observations were randomly split in a development (N=1026) and a validation cohort (N=1059). Substitutes of PGA by BASDAI total score, single or combined individual BASDAI questions, and a constant value, were considered. In the development cohort, conversion factors for each substitute were defined by Generalized Estimating Equations. Validation was performed in the validation cohort according to the OMERACT filter, taking into consideration: 1) Truth (agreement with original-ASDAS in the continuous score, by intraclass correlation coefficient -ICC- and in disease activity states, by weighted kappa) 2) Discrimination (standardized mean difference –SMD- of ASDAS scores between high/low disease activity states defined by external anchors e.g Patient Acceptable Symptom State –PASS-; agreement -kappa- in the % of patients reaching ASDAS improvement criteria according to alternative vs. original formulae) 3) Feasibility.Results:Taking all psychometric properties into account and comparing the different formulae (Table), alternative-ASDAS using BASDAI total as PGA replacement proved to be: 1) truthful (agreement with original-ASDAS: ICC=0.98, kappa=0.90); 2) discriminative: it could discriminate between high/low disease activity states (e.g. scores between PASS no/yes: SMD=1.37 versus original-ASDAS SMD=1.43) and was sensitive to change (agreement with original-ASDAS in major improvement/clinically important improvement criteria: kappa=0.93/0.88; 3) feasible (BASDAI total often available; conversion coefficient≈1).Table.Psychometric properties of alternative ASDAS formulaeConclusion:Alternative-ASDAS using BASDAI total score as PGA replacement is the most truthful, discriminative and feasible instrument. This index enables ASDAS calculation in existing cohorts without PGA.Disclosure of Interests:Augusta Ortolan: None declared, Sofia Ramiro: None declared, Floris A. van Gaalen: None declared, Tore K. Kvien Grant/research support from: Received grants from Abbvie, Hospira/Pfizer, MSD and Roche (not relevant for this abstract)., Consultant of: Have received personal fees from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lily, Hospira/Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Orion Pharma, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Sanofi and Mylan (not relevant for this abstract)., Paid instructor for: Have received personal fees from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lily, Hospira/Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Orion Pharma, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Sanofi and Mylan (not relevant for this abstract)., Speakers bureau: Have received personal fees from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lily, Hospira/Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Orion Pharma, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Sanofi and Mylan (not relevant for this abstract)., Robert B.M. Landewé Consultant of: AbbVie; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly & Co.; Galapagos NV; Novartis; Pfizer; UCB Pharma, Pedro M Machado Consultant of: PMM: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, Speakers bureau: PMM: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, Adeline Ruyssen-Witrand Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Astrid van Tubergen Consultant of: Novartis, Caroline Bastiaenen: None declared, Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma; Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV

Development of an ASAS-endorsed disease activity score (ASDAS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

2008 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Lukas ◽  
R Landewé ◽  
J Sieper ◽  
M Dougados ◽  
J Davis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Function Analysis ◽  
International Study ◽  
Patient Global Assessment ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Pain Patient

Objectives:To develop a new index for disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis (ASDAS) that is truthful, discriminative and feasible, and includes domains/items that are considered relevant by patients and doctors.Methods:Eleven candidate variables covering six domains of disease activity, selected by ASAS experts in a Delphi exercise, were tested in a three-step approach, similar to the methodology used for the disease activity score in rheumatoid arthritis. Data on 708 patients included in ISSAS (International Study on Starting tumour necrosis factor blocking agents in Ankylosing Spondylitis) were used. Cross validation was carried out in the OASIS cohort (Outcome in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study).Results:Principal component analysis disclosed three factors with eigenvalues >0.75: patient assessments, peripheral joint assessments and acute phase reactants. Discriminant function analysis resulted in a correct classification in ∼72% of the cases (prior probability ∼50%). Regression analysis resulted in an index with five variables (total back pain, patient global assessment, duration of morning stiffness, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)). Three additional candidate indices were designed using similar methodology while omitting either ESR or CRP or patient global assessment. All four scores correlated with the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI; r = 0.67–0.80), patient (0.58–0.75) and physician’s global assessment (0.41–0.48) of disease activity. All four candidate ASDAS indices performed better than BASDAI or single-item variables in discriminating between high and low disease activity state, according to doctors as well as patients in the OASIS cohort.Conclusion:The first steps in the development of a new assessment tool of disease activity in AS derived four candidate indices with good face and construct validity, and high discriminant capacity.

scholarly journals POS0241 VALIDATION OF THE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS DISEASE ACTIVITY SCORE WITH A QUICK QUANTITATIVE C-REACTIVE PROTEIN ASSAY (ASDAS-QCRP) IN PATIENTS WITH AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS (AXSPA): A PROSPECTIVE, NATIONAL, MULTICENTER STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 342.1-342
Author(s):  
F. Proft ◽  
J. Schally ◽  
H. C. Brandt ◽  
J. Brandt-Juergens ◽  
G. R. Burmester ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
High Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Reactive Protein

Background:According to international recommendations, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is the preferred score for assessing disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) [1]. However, routine determination of C-reactive protein (CRP) to calculate ASDAS values takes hours to days. This limits the use of ASDAS in clinical routine and clinical trials and hinders the implementation of treat-to-target approaches in axSpA. Whereas quick quantitative CRP (qCRP) tests allow CRP assessment within a few minutes. In a pilot project the performance of qCRP-based ASDAS assessment (ASDAS-qCRP) was already investigated in a single center study of 50 newly diagnosed, bDMARD-naïve axSpA patients with promising results [2].Objectives:To validate the ASDAS-qCRP in a prospective, multicenter study of axSpA patients in a typical axSpA cohort with an appropriate sample size.Methods:The study was conducted in five centers in Germany. Consecutive adult (≥ 18 years) axSpA patients were included. In addition to a rheumatological assessment, including patient reported outcomes (PROs), routine CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were measured in the local labs. Additionally, a qCRP testing with the „QuikRead go instrument“ (Aidian Oy, Finland) was performed at the study center (measurement range 0.5 - 200 mg/l for hematocrit concentrations of 40 – 45%). Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, cross tabulation and weighted Cohen´s kappa comparing disease activity categories, Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for ASDAS-CRP and ASDAS-qCRP.Results:In this study 251 axSpA patients were included between January and September 2020 (mean age: 38.4 years; mean disease duration: 6.2 years, 159 patients (63.3%) were male, 211 (84.1%) HLA-B27 positive and 195 (77.7%) were classified as radiographic axSpA). 143 patients (57.0%) were treated with bDMARDs. CRP and qCRP showed mean values of 2.12 and 2.17 mg/l, respectively. With the ASDAS-qCRP, 242 patients (96.4%) were assigned to the same disease activity category as compared to the ASDAS based on the conventional lab CRP measurement (Table 1). Weighted Cohen´s kappa was 0.966 (95%CI: 0.943; 0.988). ICC for ASDAS-CRP- and ASDAS-qCRP-values was 0.997 (95%CI: 0.994; 0.999). The agreement of ASDAS-qCRP and ASDAS-CRP is shown in a Bland-Altman plot (Figure 1).Table 1.Disease activity categories by ASDAS-qCRP vs. ASDAS-CRPASDAS-qCRP (n = 251)Inactive Disease(< 1.3)Low Disease Activity (1.3 - < 2.1)High Disease Activity (2.1 - 3.5)Very high Disease Activity (> 3.5)ASDAS-CRPInactive Disease(< 1.3)56 (22.3%)2 (0.8%)Low Disease Activity (1.3 - < 2.1)62 (24.7%)7 (2.8%)High Disease Activity (2.1 - 3.5)97 (38.6%)Very high Disease Activity (> 3.5)27 (10.8%)The fields highlighted in red indicate that disease activity categories do not match.ASDAS = Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, CRP = C-reactive protein, qCRP = quick quantitative CRPConclusion:The ASDAS-qCRP and ASDAS-CRP showed an almost perfect agreement on the assignment to disease activity categories (96%) with the important advantage of time. With ASDAS-qCRP, rheumatologists could base their clinical decision-making on a disease activity measurement by using a composite score immediately. ASDAS-qCRP, therefore, can be integrated in clinical routine and clinical trials in the future and may facilitate implementation of the treat-to-target concept in axial SpA.References:[1]Smolen JS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jan; 77(1):3-17.[2]Proft F, et al. Joint Bone Spine. 2019 Jul 29.Figure 1.Bland-Altman plot for ASDAS-qCRP and ASDAS-CRPAcknowledgements:The authors would like to deeply thank Braun T, Doerwald C, Deter N, Höppner C, Lackinger J, Lorenz C, Lunkwitz K, Mandt B, Sron S and Zernicke J for their practical support and coordinating the study.Funding statement: The AQUA study was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Novartis. Testing kits were provided free of charge from Aidian Oy, Finland.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Development and validation of an alternative ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score when patient global assessment is unavailable

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Augusta Ortolan ◽  
Sofia Ramiro ◽  
Floris van Gaalen ◽  
Tore K Kvien ◽  
Robert B M Landewe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Patient Acceptable Symptom State ◽  
Standardized Mean Difference

Abstract Objective To develop an alternative Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) to be used in research settings in axial SpA (axSpA) when Patient Global Assessment (PGA) is unavailable in databases. Methods Longitudinal data from four axSpA cohorts and two randomized controlled trials were combined. Observations were randomly split in a development (N = 1026) and a validation cohort (N = 1059). Substitutes of PGA by BASDAI total score, single or combined individual BASDAI questions, and a constant value, were established in the development cohort. Conversion factors for each substitute were defined by Generalized Estimating Equations, obtaining seven ‘alternative’ formulae. Validation was performed in the validation cohort according to the OMERACT filter, taking into consideration: (i) truth (agreement with original-ASDAS in the continuous score, by intraclass correlation coefficient and in disease activity states, by weighted kappa); (ii) discrimination [standardized mean difference of ASDAS scores between high/low disease activity states defined by external anchors, e.g. Patient Acceptable Symptom State; agreement (kappa) in the percentage of patients reaching ASDAS improvement criteria according to alternative vs original formulae]; and (iii) feasibility. Results Comparing various options, alternative-ASDAS using BASDAI total as PGA replacement proved to be: truthful (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98, kappa = 0.90), discriminative [ASDAS scores between Patient Acceptable Symptom State no/yes: standardized mean difference = 1.37 (original-ASDAS standardized mean difference = 1.43); agreement with original-ASDAS in major improvement/clinically important improvement criteria: kappa = 0.93/0.88] and feasible (BASDAI total often available, as questions required for the ASDAS; conversion coefficient ≈ 1). Conclusion Alternative-ASDAS using BASDAI total score as PGA replacement is the most truthful, discriminative and feasible instrument.

The Influence of the Definition of Patient Global Assessment in Assessment of Disease Activity According to the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) in Rheumatoid Arthritis

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2326-2328 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAXIME DOUGADOS ◽  
MAHAUT RIPERT ◽  
PASCAL HILLIQUIN ◽  
PATRICE FARDELLONE ◽  
OLIVIER BROCQ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Patient Global Assessment ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Very High ◽  
Assessment Of Disease Activity

Objective.Patient global assessment (PGA) is one of the 4 items included in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) for evaluation of activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We studied the influence of the use of 3 different techniques of PGA on the assessment of disease activity.Methods.We evaluated 3 different DAS28 according to the technique of PGA in 108 patients with active RA before and after 12 weeks of etanercept therapy.Results.The reliability (intraclass coefficient of correlation) between screening and baseline was very high and similar for the 3 DAS28. The percentage of patients in the different states of disease (from remission to higher disease activity) and the sensitivity to change across the 3 DAS28 scales were very similar.Conclusion.The different techniques of collection of PGA to be included in the DAS calculation yield similar results. However, an accepted, unequivocal technique should be encouraged in order to reduce heterogeneity in scoring DAS among patients with RA.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TOFACITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS IN REAL CLINICAL PRACTICE

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-275
Author(s):  
E. Yu. Loginova ◽  
Yu. L. Korsakova ◽  
E. E. Gubar ◽  
P. L. Karpova ◽  
T. V. Korotaeva
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Number Of Patients

Objective: to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) tofacitinib (TOFA; Yakvinus®) in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) at 12 and 24 weeks after starting treatment. To define the place of TOFA in the therapy of PsA patients. Subjects and methods. Examinations were made in 41 patients (17 men and 24 women) with active PsA and an insufficient response to previous treatment with synthetic DMARDs and/or biological agents (BA). Before starting therapy, the median disease activity for psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA) and disease activity score (DAS28) were 44.2 [37.8; 55.3] and 5.5 [4.7; 6.1], respectively. TOFA tablets were prescribed at a dose of 5 mg twice daily for 24 weeks with possible dose escalation to 10 mg twice daily after 12 weeks. At the beginning of the investigation, at 12 and 24 weeks, the investigators assessed disease activity and TOFA therapy efficiency of according to DAPSA, DAS28 and minimal disease activity (MDA) criteria: tender joint count ≤1, swollen joint count ≤1, a psoriasis area severity index (PASI) ≤1 or body surface area (BSA) ≤3%, pain intensity ≤15 mm, patient global assessment ≤20 mm, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ≤0.5, and enthesitis ≤1. They also determined the number of patients who had achieved remission (DAPSA ≤4, DAS28 score <2.6), low disease activity (DAPSA 5-14, ≤2.6, DAS28 <3.2) or MDA (5 out of the 7 criteria) during TOFA therapy at 24-week follow-up. The safety of therapy was evaluated by analyzing the drug-induced adverse events (AE): the frequency, severity and time of their occurrence were studied. Results and discussion. At 24 weeks after initiation of TOFA therapy, there was a significant decrease of median DAPSA and DAS28 values as compared to baseline, to 11 [4.3; 17.3] and 2.6 [1.7; 3.4] respectively. The median Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) also significantly decreased from 6 [4.2; 7] and 3.8 [2.8; 4.4] to 1.4 [0.6; 3.2] and 1.5 [1; 2.1] respectively. The median BSA was significantly reduced from 3 [1; 5] to 0.5 [0.1; 2]. At 24 weeks after initiation of TOFA therapy, DAPSA and DAS28 low disease activity/remission were achieved by 38.5/23.1% and 17.9/53.9% of patients, respectively. Fifteen (38.5%) patients achieved MDA. 38 (92.7%) of the 41 patients completed a full TOFA therapy cycle. Two patients dropped out of the investigation due to ineffective therapy and one due to AE (diarrhea occurring up to 10 times daily, headache, elevated blood pressure, and lacrimation). At 24 weeks, 14 (34.2%) patients reported to have AE. The most common AE noted in 7 (17.1%) patients were infections: acute respiratory viral infection (n=3), fever (n=2), and folliculitis (n=2). In addition, two patients had diarrhea and two had headache. Conclusion. TOFA is an effective drug for the treatment of PsA patients with moderate or high inflammatory activity, has a significant effect on all clinical manifestations of PsA and has a satisfactory safety profile.

scholarly journals THE VALUE OF THE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS DISEASE ACTIVITY SCORE (ASDAS) IN EVALUATING DISEASE ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-180
Author(s):  
Laura Muntean ◽  
◽  
Madalina Valeanu ◽  
Andreea Lungu ◽  
Ioana Felea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Daily Clinical Practice ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Clinical Measures ◽  
Discriminating Ability

Aim. To evaluate the clinical value of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) in assessing disease activity in axial SpA patients in comparison with conventional clinical measures of disease activity in daily clinical practice. Patients and methods. Eighty-five patients with axial SpA were included in a cross-sectional study. Disease activity was assessed by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (BASDAI) score, ASDAS score with C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP), ASDAS score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ASDAS-ESR), patient’s global assessment of disease activity (PtGA), CRP and ESR, while physical function was evaluated by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). The correlation between different markers of disease activity and functional capacity and ASDAS scores were determined. Patients were grouped into high and low disease activity states according to PtGA scores, CRP levels and BASDAI scores. We compared the discriminating ability of the two ASDAS versions and the conventional clinical measures of disease activity in differentiating between patients with high and low disease activity by using standardized mean differences and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results. ASDAS-CRP and ASDAS-ESR showed good correlation with BASDAI (r = 0.84 and 0.72, respectively), PtGA (r = 0.82 and 0.74, respectively), and BASFI (r = 0.74 and 0.70, espectively). Moderate correlations were seen between the two ASDAS versions and ESR and CRP (r ranged from 0.43 to 0.70). The ASDAS versions had higher discriminating capacities as compared to conventional patient-reported measures (BASDAI and PtGA) and objective markers of disease activity (CRP and ESR). The ASDAS-CRP performed better than ASDAS-ESR. Both ASDAS versions and BASDAI had high areas under the curve (AUC) according to PtGA and CRP levels (AUC ranged from 0.66 to 0.92, all p < 0.01). The calculated cut-offs for discriminating between disease activity states in our axSpA patients were relatively similar to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) endorsed cut-offs. Conclusions. ASDAS versions had higher discriminating ability in patients with axSpA in terms of high and low disease activity states than conventional measures. These findings suggest that ASDAS is a valid and reliable assessment tool for axial SpA patients in daily clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document