scholarly journals OP0009 DERIVATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SCLERODERMA LUNG 3-STAGE INDEX (SL3SI), A NEW FUNCTIONAL INDEX FOR INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE WITH PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 7.2-7
Author(s):  
A. Santaniello ◽  
C. Bellocchi ◽  
L. Bettolini ◽  
M. Cassavia ◽  
G. Montanelli ◽  
...  

Background:The staging of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is important to monitor disease progression and for prognostication. A disease severity scale of Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)-related lung disease has long been proposed (i.e. Medsger’s severity scale). This scale was mostly developed by discussion and consensus and stage thresholds were not computed by a data-driven approach. Hidden Markov models (HMM) are methods to estimate population quantities for chronic diseases with a staged interpretation which are diagnosed by markers measured at irregular intervals.Objectives:To build a SSc-ILD specific disease severity scale with prognostic relevance via HMM modeling.Methods:A total of 358 SSc patients at risk for or with ILD were enrolled in a discovery (207 cases, Milan1) and in a validation (151 cases, Milan2, Pavia and Rome) cohort. Patients were included if satisfied the following criteria: 1) Diagnosis of SSc according to the EULAR/ACR 2013 criteria, 2) absence of anticentromere antibodies, 3) dcSSc subset or 4) other subsets with either 4a) ILD-related antibodies (Scl70, PmScl, Ku) or 4b) evidence of ILD on HRCT, 5) disease duration < 5 years at the time of the first pulmonary function test (PFT). Serial PFTs were retrieved and the time up to the last available visit -if the patient alive-, or to death due to pulmonary complications, was recorded. HMM were used to estimate the threshold of a 3-stage model (SL3SI, Scleroderma Lung 3-Stage Index) based on PFT functional values (normal/mild, moderate, severe involvement) in the discovery cohort. Survival estimates of the SL3SI model were compared to Medsger’s severity classes estimates and their predictive capability evaluated via the explained residual variation (R2) of prediction errors (the higher the better). One-hundred random replicates were generated to simulate the prediction effort in patients with different disease duration and lung severity.Results:Patients characteristics are summarized in the Table. Fifteen-years survival estimates for Mesdger’s classes in the discovery set were: normal=0.88, mild=0.86, moderate=0.84 and severe=0.71. The SL3SI was defined by the following thresholds: normal/mild, FVC and DLco >=75%; moderate FVC or DLco 74-55%; severe, FVC or DLco <55%. SL3SI 15-yrs survival estimates were: normal/mild=0.89, moderate=0.82 and severe=0.63. Prediction analysis showed a higher R2values at 15 yrs for the SL3SI compared to Medsger’s classes, providing evidence for a better predictive capability of the former (discovery: 0.31 vs 0.25; validation: 0.28 vs 0.19).Conclusion:The SL3SI, a simplified 3-stage functional model of SSc-ILD, yields better survival estimates and long-term prognostic information than Medsger’s classes. Its reproducibility and ease of use make it a useful tool for the functional and prognostic evaluation of SSc patients at risk for or with ILD.Table:VariablesDiscovery (n=207)Replication (n=151)DcSSc62 (30%)98 (64%)Age at first PFR48.6±1249.1±14.4Disease duration at first PFR1.7±1.61.3±2.4FVC90.5±18.191.1±20.2DLco70.7±19.861.3±20.1ILD on HRCT179 (86%)125 (80%)Scl70157 (76%)153 (78%)SSA63 (30%)32 (21%)n of visits38571473Follow-up time, yrs11±5.610.6±5.7Deaths27 (13%)23 (15%)Disclosure of Interests:Alessandro Santaniello: None declared, Chiara Bellocchi: None declared, Luca Bettolini: None declared, Marcello Cassavia: None declared, Gaia Montanelli: None declared, Adriana Severino: None declared, Monica Caronni: None declared, Corrado Campochiaro Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, GSK, SOBI, Enrico De Lorenzis: None declared, Gerlando Natalello: None declared, Paolo Delvino: None declared, Claudio Tirelli: None declared, Lorenzo Cavagna: None declared, Giacomo De Luca Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, MSD, Silvia Laura Bosello: None declared, Lorenzo Beretta Grant/research support from: Pfizer

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harpreet K. Lota ◽  
Elisabetta A. Renzoni

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Although a large proportion of SSc patients have only limited interstitial involvement with an indolent course, in a significant minority ILD is progressive, requiring prompt treatment and careful monitoring. One of the main challenges for the clinician treating this highly variable disease is the early identification of patients at risk of progressive ILD, while avoiding potentially toxic treatments in those whose disease is inherently stable. Easily available and repeatable biomarkers that allow estimation of the risk of ILD progression and early response to treatment are highly desirable. In this paper, we review the evidence for circulating biomarkers with potential roles in diagnosis, monitoring of disease activity, or determining prognosis. Peripheral blood biomarkers offer the advantages of being readily obtained, non-invasive, and serially monitored. Several possible candidates have emerged from studies performed so far, including SP-D, KL-6, and CCL18. Presently however, there are few prospective studies evaluating the predictive ability of prospective biomarkers after adjustment for disease severity. Future carefully designed, prospective studies of well characterised patients with ILD, with optimal definition of disease severity and outcome measures are needed.


2021 ◽  
pp. 106539
Author(s):  
Yannick Molgat-Seon ◽  
Sabina A. Guler ◽  
Carli M. Peters ◽  
Dragoş M. Vasilescu ◽  
Joseph H. Puyat ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 201 (10) ◽  
pp. 1230-1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret L. Salisbury ◽  
Justin C. Hewlett ◽  
Guixiao Ding ◽  
Cheryl R. Markin ◽  
Katrina Douglas ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Victoria MacBean ◽  
Mohammad A.F. Siddiqui ◽  
Amit S. Patel ◽  
Surinder S. Birring ◽  
John Moxham ◽  
...  

Rheumatology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rania M Gamal ◽  
Hanan S M Abozaid ◽  
Mohmed Zidan ◽  
Walid M Gamal ◽  
Eman Abo Elhamd ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
David G. Parr ◽  
Emma Helm ◽  
Joanna Shakespeare ◽  
Rhian Hughes ◽  
Abhir Bhalerao

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (11) ◽  
pp. 1449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohit Bakshi ◽  
Mohit Neema ◽  
Brian C. Healy ◽  
Zsuzsanna Liptak ◽  
Rebecca A. Betensky ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanan Mohamed El Kahky ◽  
Heba Mahmoud Diab ◽  
Dalia Gamal Aly ◽  
Nehal Magdi Farag

Background. Two preparations of botulinum A toxin (BTX-A) are commercially available for the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis (PPH): Botox (Allergan; 100 U/vial) and Dysport (Ipsen Limited; 500 U/vial), which are not bioequivalent. Results regarding an appropriate conversion factor between them are controversial.Objectives. This paper aims to compare the efficacy of Botox and Dysport in PPH using a conversion factor of 1 : 2.5.Methods. Eight patients with severe PPH received intradermal injections of Botox in one palm and Dysport in the other in the same session. Clinical assessment was performed at baseline and posttreatment for 8 months using Minor’s iodine starch test, Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) test.Results. At 3 weeks, a significant decrease in sweating for both preparations was noted which was more pronounced with Dysport compared with Botox. At 8 weeks, this difference turned insignificant. Continued evaluation showed similar improvement in both palms with a nonsignificant difference. Patients with longer disease duration were more liable to relapse.Conclusion. The efficacy and safety of Botox and Dysport injections were similar using a conversion factor of 1 : 2.5. There was a trend towards a more rapid action after Dysport treatment but without significant importance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document