scholarly journals CO0005 C-C CHEMOKINE RECEPTOR TYPE 5 AND ITS LIGANDS CCL4, 8 AND 11 CAN LINK COVID-19, RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 213.3-214
Author(s):  
M. Y. Hachim ◽  
S. Hannawi

Background:Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by SARS-COV2 represents an unprecedented global public health concern with a particular burden on patients with chronic diseases and those on immune-modulating drugs. It is especially worrisome to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are on immune suppression regimens[1]. On the other side, many reports showed and recommended the use of some Disease-Modifying Drugs commonly used to treat rheumatic diseases like hydroxychloroquine. However, the general understanding of COVID-19 characteristics in this population and the mechanism of action of these drugs in COVID-19 is still unknown[2].Objectives:Explore publicly available transcriptomic dataset of patients infected with SARS-COV2 compared to uninfected to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to the immune system that might be pathogenic in RA synovium. Then explore the effect of Disease-Modifying Drugs on their local expression that might give hints about their possible mechanism of action.Methods:RNAseq dataset (GSE147507) were retrieved using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and used to identify DEGs between infected and uninfected lung samples using BioJupies tools [3]. The DEGs were explored for common pathways using Metascape online tool (http://metascape.org) [10], as shown in figure (1). The chemokines genes were filtered out, and their common receptor (CR) was identified. The immune cells that express a higher level of the identified receptor were explored using DICE project tool (https://dice-database.org/). The expression of CR was searched in a microarray dataset (GSE77298) of synovial biopsies of RA and healthy controls. RNAseq dataset (GSE97165) of synovial biopsies taken from 19 early RA patients at baseline and after six months of Triple Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic drugs (tDMARD; methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine) treatment.Results:84 DEGs were identified between uninfected and COVID-19 infected lung samples. These DEGs were enriched in pathways specific to (response to the virus, response to interferon, leukocyte activation, and chemotaxis). Interestingly, SARS-COV-2 infected lungs express more CCL4, CCL8, and CCL11; the three ligands shared the same receptor, which is CCR5. Top immune cells that express CCR5 were CD4 T memory T reg cells, Th17, Th1, and monocytes. CCR5 was significantly upregulated in RA compared to healthy controls synovium (p=0.04) and was dramatically downregulated after six months of tDMARD treatment (p=0.004), as shown in figure (2).Conclusion:Using publicly available transcriptomic datasets properly highlighted the possible beneficiary effect of DMARDs in patients with COVID-19, which can block CCR5 rich immune cells recruitment.References:[1]Favalli, E.G., et al.,COVID-19 infection and rheumatoid arthritis: Faraway, so close!Autoimmun Rev, 2020. 19(5): p. 102523.[2]Gianfrancesco, M.A., et al.,Rheumatic disease and COVID-19: initial data from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance provider registries.The Lancet Rheumatology, 2020. 2(5): p. e250-e253.[3]Torre, D., A. Lachmann, and A. Ma’ayan,BioJupies: Automated Generation of Interactive Notebooks for RNA-Seq Data Analysis in the Cloud.Cell Systems, 2018. 7(5): p. 556-561.e3.Figure 1.Flowchart of transcriptomic analysisFigure 2.(A) Top immune cells that express CCR5 (B) CCR5 expression in synovial biopsies of RA and control (C) CCR5 expression at baseline and after 6 months of tDMARD treatment.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 929.1-930
Author(s):  
Y. M. Pers ◽  
V. Valsecchi ◽  
T. Mura ◽  
S. Aouinti ◽  
N. Filippi ◽  
...  

Background:Telemedicine has found wider application in chronic diseases for encouraging tight home-monitoring in order to improve patients’ outcome (Smolen et al. 2017).In previous studies, a high feasibility and high patient-satisfaction rate was found as well as the evidence for a superior or equal effectiveness of telemedicine compared to the standard face-to-face approach, however the results were weakened by some methodological biases and wide heterogeneity of interventions, thus preventing to draw definitive conclusions (Piga et al. 2017; Najm, Gossec, et al. 2019).Objectives:In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), telemedicine may allow a tight control of disease activity while reducing hospital visits. We developed a smartphone application connected with a physician’s interface to monitor RA patients. We aimed to assess the performance of this e-Health solution in comparison with routine practice in the management of patients with RA.Methods:A 6-month pragmatic, randomized, controlled, prospective, clinical trial was conducted in RA patients with high to moderate disease activity starting a new Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) therapy. Two groups were established: “connected monitoring” and “conventional monitoring”. The primary outcome was the number of physical visits between baseline and 6 months. Secondary outcomes included adherence, satisfaction, changes in clinical, functional, and health status scores (SF-12).Results:Of the 94 randomized patients, 89 completed study: 44 in the “conventional monitoring” arm and 45 in the “connected monitoring” arm. The total number of physical visits between baseline and 6 month was significantly lower in the “connected monitoring” group (0.42 ± 0.58 versus 1.93 ± 0.55; p<0.05). No differences between groups were observed in the clinical and functional scores. A better quality of life for SF-12 subscores (Role-Physical, Social-Functioning and Role-Emotional) were found in the “connected monitoring” group.Conclusion:According to our results, a connected monitoring reduces the number of physical visits while maintaining a tight control of disease activity and improving quality of life in patients with RA starting a new treatment.References:[1] Najm, Aurelie, Laure Gossec, Catherine Weill, David Benoist, Francis Berenbaum, and Elena Nikiphorou. 2019. “Mobile Health Apps for Self-Management of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases: Systematic Literature Review.”JMIR MHealth and UHealth7 (11): e14730.https://doi.org/10.2196/14730.[2] Piga, Matteo, Ignazio Cangemi, Alessandro Mathieu, and Alberto Cauli. 2017. “Telemedicine for Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Systematic Review and Proposal for Research Agenda.”Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism47 (1): 121–28.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.03.014.[3] Smolen, Josef S, Robert Landewe, Johannes Bijlsma, Gerd Burmester, Katerina Chatzidionysiou, Maxime Dougados, Jackie Nam, et al. 2017. “EULAR Recommendations for the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Synthetic and Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: 2016 Update.”Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases76 (6): 960–77.https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2593-2600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devin R. Mangold ◽  
Eric R. Wagner ◽  
Robert H. Cofield ◽  
Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo ◽  
John W. Sperling

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-270
Author(s):  
Jenny Rocío Rincón Rincón ◽  
Diego Alejandro Jaimes Fernández ◽  
Julio César García Casallas ◽  
Adriana Beltrán ◽  
Angélica Téllez ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 624-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Neovius ◽  
Julia F Simard ◽  
Johan Askling ◽  

ObjectiveTo provide Swedish nationwide data on the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including variations by age, sex, geography, demography and education level, and assess antirheumatic treatment penetration.MethodsPatients ≥16 years assigned an RA diagnosis were identified from inpatient (n=96 560; 1964–2007) and specialist outpatient care (n=56 336; 2001–2007) in the Swedish National Patient Register, and the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register (n=21 242; 1995–2007). Data on prescriptions, demography, vital status and educational level were retrieved from national registers.ResultsA total of 58 102 individuals (mean age 66 years; 73% women) assigned an RA diagnosis were alive in Sweden in 2008, corresponding to a cumulative prevalence of 0.77% (women 1.11%, men 0.43%). The 2001–2007 period prevalence was 0.70%. Restriction to patients with ≥2 visits or diagnosis from a rheumatologist/internist reduced the overall cumulative prevalence to 0.68%. Whereas urban/rural differences (crude 0.65–1.00%) were explained by age differences, the age/sex-adjusted prevalence remained higher in patients with ≤9 years education (0.86%) than for those with 10–12 years (0.82%) and >12 years (0.65%). Treatment exposures (76% any disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or steroids, 64% any DMARD, 15% biological agents) varied with age; use of biological agents decreased from 22% in 16–59 years olds to 3% in ≥80 years olds. Any DMARD use correspondingly decreased from 71% to 43%. Applying age cut-off points from previous northern European and North American prevalence studies reduced or eliminated between-study differences.ConclusionThis nationwide approach yielded a prevalence of RA similar to previous regional assessments. While displaying only modest geographical variation and no urban/rural gradient, prevalence was associated with educational level. Although most patients received antirheumatic drugs, age was a strong treatment determinant.


1998 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 1190-1195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Abu-Shakra ◽  
Rita Toker ◽  
Daniel Flusser ◽  
Gideon Flusser ◽  
Michael Friger ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document