EFFECTS OF DISEASE MODIFYING DRUGS ON HUMORAL IMMUNITY IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Author(s):  
Maria Issagouliantis
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 213.3-214
Author(s):  
M. Y. Hachim ◽  
S. Hannawi

Background:Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by SARS-COV2 represents an unprecedented global public health concern with a particular burden on patients with chronic diseases and those on immune-modulating drugs. It is especially worrisome to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are on immune suppression regimens[1]. On the other side, many reports showed and recommended the use of some Disease-Modifying Drugs commonly used to treat rheumatic diseases like hydroxychloroquine. However, the general understanding of COVID-19 characteristics in this population and the mechanism of action of these drugs in COVID-19 is still unknown[2].Objectives:Explore publicly available transcriptomic dataset of patients infected with SARS-COV2 compared to uninfected to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to the immune system that might be pathogenic in RA synovium. Then explore the effect of Disease-Modifying Drugs on their local expression that might give hints about their possible mechanism of action.Methods:RNAseq dataset (GSE147507) were retrieved using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and used to identify DEGs between infected and uninfected lung samples using BioJupies tools [3]. The DEGs were explored for common pathways using Metascape online tool (http://metascape.org) [10], as shown in figure (1). The chemokines genes were filtered out, and their common receptor (CR) was identified. The immune cells that express a higher level of the identified receptor were explored using DICE project tool (https://dice-database.org/). The expression of CR was searched in a microarray dataset (GSE77298) of synovial biopsies of RA and healthy controls. RNAseq dataset (GSE97165) of synovial biopsies taken from 19 early RA patients at baseline and after six months of Triple Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic drugs (tDMARD; methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine) treatment.Results:84 DEGs were identified between uninfected and COVID-19 infected lung samples. These DEGs were enriched in pathways specific to (response to the virus, response to interferon, leukocyte activation, and chemotaxis). Interestingly, SARS-COV-2 infected lungs express more CCL4, CCL8, and CCL11; the three ligands shared the same receptor, which is CCR5. Top immune cells that express CCR5 were CD4 T memory T reg cells, Th17, Th1, and monocytes. CCR5 was significantly upregulated in RA compared to healthy controls synovium (p=0.04) and was dramatically downregulated after six months of tDMARD treatment (p=0.004), as shown in figure (2).Conclusion:Using publicly available transcriptomic datasets properly highlighted the possible beneficiary effect of DMARDs in patients with COVID-19, which can block CCR5 rich immune cells recruitment.References:[1]Favalli, E.G., et al.,COVID-19 infection and rheumatoid arthritis: Faraway, so close!Autoimmun Rev, 2020. 19(5): p. 102523.[2]Gianfrancesco, M.A., et al.,Rheumatic disease and COVID-19: initial data from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance provider registries.The Lancet Rheumatology, 2020. 2(5): p. e250-e253.[3]Torre, D., A. Lachmann, and A. Ma’ayan,BioJupies: Automated Generation of Interactive Notebooks for RNA-Seq Data Analysis in the Cloud.Cell Systems, 2018. 7(5): p. 556-561.e3.Figure 1.Flowchart of transcriptomic analysisFigure 2.(A) Top immune cells that express CCR5 (B) CCR5 expression in synovial biopsies of RA and control (C) CCR5 expression at baseline and after 6 months of tDMARD treatment.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2593-2600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devin R. Mangold ◽  
Eric R. Wagner ◽  
Robert H. Cofield ◽  
Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo ◽  
John W. Sperling

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-270
Author(s):  
Jenny Rocío Rincón Rincón ◽  
Diego Alejandro Jaimes Fernández ◽  
Julio César García Casallas ◽  
Adriana Beltrán ◽  
Angélica Téllez ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 624-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Neovius ◽  
Julia F Simard ◽  
Johan Askling ◽  

ObjectiveTo provide Swedish nationwide data on the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including variations by age, sex, geography, demography and education level, and assess antirheumatic treatment penetration.MethodsPatients ≥16 years assigned an RA diagnosis were identified from inpatient (n=96 560; 1964–2007) and specialist outpatient care (n=56 336; 2001–2007) in the Swedish National Patient Register, and the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register (n=21 242; 1995–2007). Data on prescriptions, demography, vital status and educational level were retrieved from national registers.ResultsA total of 58 102 individuals (mean age 66 years; 73% women) assigned an RA diagnosis were alive in Sweden in 2008, corresponding to a cumulative prevalence of 0.77% (women 1.11%, men 0.43%). The 2001–2007 period prevalence was 0.70%. Restriction to patients with ≥2 visits or diagnosis from a rheumatologist/internist reduced the overall cumulative prevalence to 0.68%. Whereas urban/rural differences (crude 0.65–1.00%) were explained by age differences, the age/sex-adjusted prevalence remained higher in patients with ≤9 years education (0.86%) than for those with 10–12 years (0.82%) and >12 years (0.65%). Treatment exposures (76% any disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or steroids, 64% any DMARD, 15% biological agents) varied with age; use of biological agents decreased from 22% in 16–59 years olds to 3% in ≥80 years olds. Any DMARD use correspondingly decreased from 71% to 43%. Applying age cut-off points from previous northern European and North American prevalence studies reduced or eliminated between-study differences.ConclusionThis nationwide approach yielded a prevalence of RA similar to previous regional assessments. While displaying only modest geographical variation and no urban/rural gradient, prevalence was associated with educational level. Although most patients received antirheumatic drugs, age was a strong treatment determinant.


1998 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 1190-1195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Abu-Shakra ◽  
Rita Toker ◽  
Daniel Flusser ◽  
Gideon Flusser ◽  
Michael Friger ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-64
Author(s):  
Basant Kumar Maheshwari ◽  
Prafulla Kumar Khodiar ◽  
Debapriya Rath

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by polyarticular inflammation with systemic symptoms like malaise, fatigue and fever. Various groups of drugs have been used along with supportive therapies (physical and occupational) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and disease modifying agents in rheumatoid disease (DMARDs) are the two major classes among them. However, none of these medications have proved to be successful enough to be accepted universally as the standard therapy for RA.Aims and Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of nimesulide as a standalone therapy with combination therapy of nimesulide plus methotrexate and nimesulide plus hydroxychloroquine.Materials and Methods: The study comprised of three groups of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Each group consists of 32 study subjects. Group 1, 2 and 3 consisted of patients taking nimesulide alone, nimesulide plus hydroxycholoroquine and nimesulide plus methotrexate respectively for the disease. The cases were followed up to a period of six months and based upon subjective & objective (Radiological and serological examination) criteria, results have been evaluated.Results: Observations have revealed that nimesulide plus hydroxycholoroquine combination produced significant improvement in the patients in mild, moderate and severe cases of rheumatoid arthritis as compared to nimesulide plus methotrexate. The improvement observed was least in the patients who received nimesulide as standalone therapy. No significant adverse drug reaction was seen in any of the study groups.Conclusion: The study concludes that nimesulide plus hydroxychloroquine combination can be used in cases of rheumatoid arthritis as disease modifying drugs without noticeable toxicity in doses used in this study in patients who have no renal and hepatic insufficiency.Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.9(1) 2018 61-64


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document