scholarly journals Co-producing a social determinants of health questionnaire for an urban population in community child health

Author(s):  
Guddi Singh ◽  
Aisha Damarell

We used quality improvement (QI) and co-production methodologies to explore how child health professionals can be helped to open up conversations about poverty and other social issues in a London community child health clinic between July and October 2019.

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. e95-e96
Author(s):  
Yipeng Ge ◽  
Radha Jetty ◽  
Dennis Newhook ◽  
Richard Webster ◽  
Amanda Mills ◽  
...  

Abstract Primary Subject area Social Paediatrics Background The Inuit Child Health Clinic is a consulting general pediatric outpatient clinic at an urban tertiary level paediatric designed to improve integration and coordination of care for Inuit children, youth, and their families from Nunavut. Characterizing medical and social complexity for this patient population will help to address existing gaps in health and social care, as well as contribute to the development of a culturally safe and sensitive determinants of health screening tool. Objectives To study and characterize the complexities that families cared for by the Inuit Child Health Clinic experience in navigating the health and community environments to identify gaps that exist within their care and understand how we can better support their unique needs. We define medical complexity similarly, referenced in existing literature as multi-system or multi-service involvement or prolonged stay in the city of the urban tertiary level paediatric hospital to access medical care. Design/Methods A retrospective chart review of patients (children and youth between the ages of 0-18 years old) and their caregivers that attended an outpatient general paediatric medicine clinic visit appointment with the Inuit Child Health Clinic between September 30, 2016, and September 30, 2019. A review of 59 patient charts were completed by 2 independent reviewers each for demographic information, medical complexity variables, and social complexity variables. This research has been approved by a local Research Ethics Board as well as the Nunavut Research Institute. Results There are high levels of medical and social complexity as evident through the high average number of healthcare services accessed, number of comorbidities, and number of admissions to hospital. We also found considerable inconsistencies with respect to documentation by providers on the social determinants of health of patients. Note: In collaboration with the Inuuqatigiit Centre for Inuit Children Youth and Families, Qikiqtani Inuit Association (QIA), Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated (NTI), and the Department of Health in Nunavut, the results and knowledge will be shared and mobilized to reflect a narrative that is community-driven and comments on any possible gaps in social determinants of health screening in clinical settings. Furthermore, in collaboration with the Qaujigiartiit Health Research Centre, this work will inform and support the broader program evaluation of the Inuit Child Health Clinic to meet the needs of patients, families, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Conclusion A multidisciplinary team approach that focuses on integrative care may be an effective and efficient means to promote communication and collaboration between multiple service providers that are often involved in providing care to this population that is put at-risk due to systemic health and social inequities. Improving social history taking and integrating more formal screening for social determinants of health within the Inuit Child Health Clinic practice should be considered.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 175346662110374
Author(s):  
Dana Albon ◽  
Heather Bruschwein ◽  
Morgan Soper ◽  
Rhonda List ◽  
Deirdre Jennings ◽  
...  

Introduction: Outcomes in cystic fibrosis are influenced by multiple factors, including social determinants of health. Low socioeconomic status has been shown to be associated with lung function decline, increased exacerbation rates, increased health care utilization, and decreased survival in cystic fibrosis. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the US economy, placing people with cystic fibrosis at risk for negative impacts due to changes in social determinants of health. Methods: To characterize the impact of COVID-19-related changes in social determinants of health in the adult cystic fibrosis population, a social determinants of health questionnaire was designed and distributed to patients as part of a quality improvement project. Results: Of 132 patients contacted, 76 (57.6%) responses were received. Of these responses, 22 (28.9%) answered yes to at least one question that indicated an undesired change in social determinants of health. Patients with stable employment prior to COVID-19 were more likely to endorse undesired change in all domains of the questionnaire, and the undesired changes were most likely to be related to employment, insurance security, and access to medications. Patients receiving disability were more likely to report hardship related to utilities and food security compared with patients previously employed or unemployed. Of patients endorsing risk of socioeconomic hardship, 21 (95.5%) were contacted by a social worker and provided resources. Conclusion: Utilizing a social determinants of health questionnaire to screen for social instability in the context of COVID-19 is feasible and beneficial for patients with cystic fibrosis. Identifying social issues early during the pandemic and implementing processes to provide resources may help patients with cystic fibrosis mitigate social hardship and maintain access to health care and medications.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen Kells ◽  
Daphne Goodman-Eifler

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor Holding ◽  
Hannah Fairbrother ◽  
Naomi Griffin ◽  
Jonathan Wistow ◽  
Katie Powell ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Improving children and young people’s (CYP) health and addressing health inequalities are international priorities. Reducing inequalities is particularly pertinent in light of the Covid-19 outbreak which has exacerbated already widening inequalities in health. This study aimed to explore understandings of inequality, the anticipated pathways for reducing inequalities among CYP and key factors affecting the development and implementation of policy to reduce inequalities among CYP at a local level. Methods We carried out a qualitative case study of one local government region in the North of England (UK), comprising semi structured interviews (n = 16) with service providers with a responsibility for child health, non-participant observations of key meetings (n = 6 with 43 participants) where decisions around child health are made, and a local policy documentation review (n = 11). We employed a novel theoretical framework, drawing together different approaches to understanding policy, to guide our design and analysis. Results Participants in our study understood inequalities in CYP health almost exclusively as socioeconomically patterned inequalities in health practices and outcomes. Strategies which participants perceived to reduce inequalities included: preventive support and early intervention, an early years/whole family focus, targeted working in local areas of high deprivation, organisational integration and whole system/place-based approaches. Despite demonstrating a commitment to a social determinants of health approach, efforts to reduce inequalities were described as thwarted by the prevalence of poverty and budget cuts which hindered the ability of local organisations to work together. Participants critiqued national policy which aimed to reduce inequalities in CYP health for failing to recognise local economic disparities and the interrelated nature of the determinants of health. Conclusions Despite increased calls for a ‘whole systems’ approach to reducing inequalities in health, significant barriers to implementation remain. National governments need to work towards more joined up policy making, which takes into consideration regional disparities, allows for flexibility in interpretation and addresses the different and interrelated social determinants of health. Our findings have particular significance in light of Covid-19 and indicate the need for systems level policy responses and a health in all policies approach.


2003 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhiannon England ◽  
Kathy Doughty ◽  
Sevtap Genc ◽  
Zeynep Putkeli

1982 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-240
Author(s):  
W Hendrickse ◽  
A Nicoll ◽  
L Polnay ◽  
D Roberton ◽  
S A Spencer

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Polly Mitchell ◽  
Alan Cribb ◽  
Vikki Entwistle ◽  
Guddi Singh

Abstract Background Poverty and social deprivation have adverse effects on health outcomes and place a significant burden on healthcare systems. There are some actions that can be taken to tackle them from within healthcare institutions, but clinicians who seek to make frontline services more responsive to the social determinants of health and the social context of people’s lives can face a range of ethical challenges. We summarise and consider a case in which clinicians introduced a poverty screening initiative (PSI) into paediatric practice using the discourse and methodology of healthcare quality improvement (QI). Discussion Whilst suggesting that interventions like the PSI are a potentially valuable extension of clinical roles, which take advantage of the unique affordances of clinical settings, we argue that there is a tendency for such settings to continuously reproduce a narrower set of norms. We illustrate how the framing of an initiative as QI can help legitimate and secure funding for practical efforts to help address social ends from within clinical service, but also how it can constrain and disguise the value of this work. A combination of methodological emphases within QI and managerialism within healthcare institutions leads to the prioritisation, often implicitly, of a limited set of aims and governing values for healthcare. This can act as an obstacle to a genuine broadening of the clinical agenda, reinforcing norms of clinical practice that effectively push poverty ‘off limits.’ We set out the ethical dilemmas facing clinicians who seek to navigate this landscape in order to address poverty and the social determinants of health. Conclusions We suggest that reclaiming QI as a more deliberative tool that is sensitive to these ethical dilemmas can enable managers, clinicians and patients to pursue health-related values and ends, broadly conceived, as part of an expansive range of social and personal goods.


Author(s):  
Tony Waterston ◽  
Delan Devakumar

Advocacy is ‘speaking out on behalf of a particular issue, idea, or person’, acting as a catalyst for change. To achieve the targets described in this book requires advocates and champions. It is therefore an essential component of the work of all health professionals to ensure that services work better for the population and for patients. Effective advocacy requires diplomacy, persistence, an understanding of how systems work, and an ability to work with disciplines outside medicine. The targets of advocacy have traditionally been healthcare focused, but considering the wider social determinants of health is essential. An understanding of social and political science is essential when thinking of the best ways to advocate for and improve a situation. In this chapter, we summarise a toolkit for how to advocate to improve health, and provide two real-life case studies on the commercialisation of infant feeding and child abuse in Mumbai.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document