scholarly journals Importance of timing of post-contrast MRI in rheumatoid arthritis: what happens during the first 60 minutes after IV gadolinium-DTPA?

2001 ◽  
Vol 60 (11) ◽  
pp. 1050-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ostergaard
2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 928-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Davis ◽  
M. Castillo

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the MRI findings of children with rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) affecting the temporomandibular joints (TMJ) and correlate these findings with symptoms. MRI studies of the TMJ in 26 children with a clinical diagnosis of JRA were retrospectively reviewed. All studies included oblique and sagittal T1, T2*, proton density/T2, and coronal T1-weighted images. T1 and proton density/T2-images were repeated with the mouth open. Post contrast sagittal and coronal T1-images were obtained in 19 patients. All studies were done on either 1.5 Tesla or 3.0 Tesla units with dedicated surface coils. By consensus, two radiologists evaluated the studies for abnormal condyles, bone erosions, presence or absence of discs, effusions, contrast enhancement and pannus. Open mouth views were assessed for incomplete or abnormal translation. Clinical records were reviewed to correlate symptoms with MRI findings. Abnormal condyles were seen in 49%. Discs were identifiable in 71%. Abnormal translation was seen in 71% and pannus in 49%. Erosions were seen in 37%, effusions in 24% and contrast enhancement in 50%. Correlation with clinical examination showed that of five asymptomatic patients, three had abnormal translation. Fifteen patients presented joint asymmetry on clinical examination and all showed abnormal translation on MRI. Our findings suggest that abnormal translation and joint enhancement may be the most common MRI findings in JRA patients with TMJ arthritis. Abnormalities may occur even in the absence of symptoms and the most common finding in symptomatic patients is abnormal translation.


1989 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 591-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian F. Reiser ◽  
Georg P. Bongartz ◽  
Rainer Erlemann ◽  
Mathias Schneider ◽  
Thomas Pauly ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 498-499
Author(s):  
M. Boesen ◽  
M. Hinton ◽  
J. Gonzalez-Zabaleta ◽  
S. Beattie ◽  
D. Schlichting ◽  
...  

Background:Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to confirm dose selection in a phase IIb clinical trial of baricitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on background methotrexate therapy (NCT01185353).[1] MRI data were retrospectively assessed for consistency, timing of post-contrast sequences following intravenous (IV) Gadolinium (Gd), and readability. Data were re-analyzed using a novel quantitative computer-aided methodology to extract the continuous volume of inflammatory changes.[2]Objectives:The objective was to examine how image quality and timing of the post-contrast MRI sequence can impact MRI-based exploratory endpoints in RA clinical trials when using novel computer-aided analysis tools.Methods:A total of 154 patients with definitive radiographic erosion had an MRI of the hand and wrist at baseline and at weeks 12 and 24. Three-dimensional T1-w fat-suppressed MRI sequences before and after IV Gd contrast were performed with dedicated coils. Due to the limited field of view, the coils were re-positioned during the image acquisition between the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and finger joints and the wrist, following IV Gd injection, which introduced a time delay of the post-contrast sequences in the two anatomies in all patients.Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) headers of the MRIs were automatically assessed; the distribution of the time delay in minutes from Gd injection to post-contrast scan acquisition was calculated and the image quality and suitability for reading were evaluated (Figure 1). The time delays across MRI acquisitions at baseline and weeks 12 and 24 were also compared. Quality scores were assigned for each image using visual image quality assessment by an experienced reader blinded to treatment regimen, patient visits, and time after Gd. The images were categorized by quality based on total score. The reader used a proprietary software, to pre-define regions of interest (ROI) around the wrist and MCP joints (MCP-2 to MCP-5) in all three timepoints as a batch, avoiding adjacent blood vessels and possible artifacts. From these ROIs, the normalized volume of inflammation (NormI) was calculated in each joint relative to a standardized ROI in the thenar muscle. Quantitative Total Volume of Inflammation (QVI) was extracted automatically from all ROIs by counting the pixels that were enhanced two standard deviations above the intensity level of the normal muscle, allowing differentiation of areas with low-to-high inflammation.Results:The timing of post-contrast images from Gd injection was closely linked to image quality. In up to 10% of MRI data, the delay from Gd injection to scan acquisition caused significant variation in signal intensities. This led to a perceived increase in enhanced synovial volume due to the known effusion effects of the contrast media over time, which did not correspond to real size of the underlying synovial volume and pathology (Figure 2).Conclusion:The acquisition of MRIs in RA trials should be done in a methodical and systematic manner, where the quality of MRI scans and the correct timing of post-contrast sequences are optimized. The incorporation of unacceptable quality data will impact the interpretation of RA clinical trial data, especially when novel computer-assisted quantitative analysis methods for post-processing are used. Incorrect timing and inconsistency in image quality can be prevented by using coils covering the whole hand and/or a dynamic contrast-enhance (DCE)-MRI sequence immediately following IV Gd injection to ensure correct timing of the post-contrast MRI sequence.References:[1]Peterfy C, et al. J Rheumatol. 2019 46: 887–895.[2]Tripathi D, et al. IJRCI. 2014 2(S1):SR2. DOI: 10.15305/ijrci/v2iS1/89.Disclosure of Interests:Mikael Boesen Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Esaote, Glenmark, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Paid instructor for: IAG, Image Analysis Group, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, esaote, Glenmark, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB (scientific advisor)., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Esaote, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Mark Hinton: None declared, Javier Gonzalez-Zabaleta: None declared, Scott Beattie Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Douglas Schlichting Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Terence Rooney Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Olga Kubassova Shareholder of: IAG, Image Analysis Group, Consultant of: Novartis, Takeda, Lilly, Employee of: IAG, Image Analysis Group


2001 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Garcia-Lozano ◽  
M. F. Gonzalez-Escribano ◽  
A. Valenzuela ◽  
A. Garcia ◽  
A. Nunez-Roldan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document