scholarly journals Adenoid cystic carcinoma: triple negative breast cancer with good prognosis

2016 ◽  
pp. bcr2015213704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Romeira ◽  
Débora Cardoso ◽  
Helena Miranda ◽  
Ana Martins
Mastology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matheus Lavigne Marinho ◽  
Alexandre Tafuri ◽  
Carlos Alberto da Silva Ramos ◽  
Antônio Alexandre Lisbôa Ladeia ◽  
Luciana de Carvalho Azevedo

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) of the breast is an uncommon invasive lobular neoplasm whose morphology is similar to the homonymous tumor of salivary glands and with a peculiar behavior toward the “triple-negative” (TN) profile. Tumors belonging to this family do not immunohistochemically express three of the main prognostic biomarkers and tend to show a more aggressive behavior. However, this rare histological pattern of breast cancer is generally associated with good prognosis. In this study, the authors describe the case of a 49-year-old woman diagnosed with this rare malignant tumor and who underwent breast-conserving surgery. Recent studies have aimed to understand the genes, genetic alterations, and etiological aspects related to the still obscure etiopathogenesis of AdCC. Thus, morphological and molecular aspects relevant to AdCC and reported in the literature will be discussed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 1154-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Stoeck ◽  
Serguei Lejnine ◽  
Andrew Truong ◽  
Li Pan ◽  
Hongfang Wang ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1292-1305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Fusco ◽  
Felipe C Geyer ◽  
Maria R De Filippo ◽  
Luciano G Martelotto ◽  
Charlotte K Y Ng ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shristi Bhattarai ◽  
Sergey Klimov ◽  
Karuna Mittal ◽  
Uma Krishnamurti ◽  
Xiaoxian Li ◽  
...  

Background: The androgen receptor (AR) has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for AR-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, conflicting reports regarding AR’s prognostic role in TNBC are putting its usefulness in question. Some studies conclude that AR positivity indicates a good prognosis in TNBC, whereas others suggest the opposite, and some show that AR status has no significant bearing on the patients’ prognosis. Methods: We evaluated the prognostic value of AR in resected primary tumors from TNBC patients from six international cohorts {US (n = 420), UK (n = 239), Norway (n = 104), Ireland (n = 222), Nigeria (n = 180), and India (n = 242); total n = 1407}. All TNBC samples were stained with the same anti-AR antibody using the same immunohistochemistry protocol, and samples with ≥1% of AR-positive nuclei were deemed AR-positive TNBCs. Results: AR status shows population-specific patterns of association with patients’ overall survival after controlling for age, grade, population, and chemotherapy. We found AR-positive status to be a marker of good prognosis in US and Nigerian cohorts, a marker of poor prognosis in Norway, Ireland and Indian cohorts, and neutral in UK cohort. Conclusion: AR status, on its own, is not a reliable prognostic marker. More research to investigate molecular subtype composition among the different cohorts is warranted.


Surgery Today ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 843-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motoi Baba ◽  
Masato Takahashi ◽  
Katsushige Yamashiro ◽  
Hideki Yokoo ◽  
Moto Fukai ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sakhri ◽  
K Hamza ◽  
S Kamoun ◽  
Y Houcine ◽  
T Karima ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document