Consider prioritising homeless people on waiting lists to improve their health, says NICE

BMJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. n2447
Author(s):  
Ingrid Torjesen
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-206
Author(s):  
Hnes I ◽  
◽  
Solovij L ◽  

Examples of designing institutions for the homeless in foreign practice are considered, which are compared with the results of our sociological study of homeless people in Ukraine. A socio-typological scheme for introducing various types of housing for the homeless is proposed based on the integration of housing units with industrial and educational functions.


2002 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
Jong-Chun Kim ◽  
Eun-Joo Kim
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-121
Author(s):  
Shamier Ebrahim

The right to adequate housing is a constitutional imperative which is contained in section 26 of the Constitution. The state is tasked with the progressive realisation of this right. The allocation of housing has been plagued with challenges which impact negatively on the allocation process. This note analyses Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality v Various Occupiers, Eden Park Extension 51 which dealt with a situation where one of the main reasons provided by the Supreme Court of Appeal for refusing the eviction order was because the appellants subjected the unlawful occupiers to defective waiting lists and failed to engage with the community regarding the compilation of the lists and the criteria used to identify beneficiaries. This case brings to the fore the importance of a coherent (reasonable) waiting list in eviction proceedings. This note further analyses the impact of the waiting list system in eviction proceedings and makes recommendations regarding what would constitute a coherent (reasonable) waiting list for the purpose of section 26(2) of the Constitution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document