scholarly journals Child health and the implementation of Community and District-management Empowerment for Scale-up (CODES) in Uganda: a randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. e006084
Author(s):  
Peter Waiswa ◽  
Flavia Mpanga ◽  
Danstan Bagenda ◽  
Rornald Muhumuza Kananura ◽  
Thomas O’Connell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Child Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Health Systems Strengthening ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Management Interventions ◽  
District Management ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionUganda’s district-level administrative units buttress the public healthcare system. In many districts, however, local capacity is incommensurate with that required to plan and implement quality health interventions. This study investigates how a district management strategy informed by local data and community dialogue influences health services.MethodsA 3-year randomised controlled trial (RCT) comprised of 16 Ugandan districts tested a management approach, Community and District-management Empowerment for Scale-up (CODES). Eight districts were randomly selected for each of the intervention and comparison areas. The approach relies on a customised set of data-driven diagnostic tools to identify and resolve health system bottlenecks. Using a difference-in-differences approach, the authors performed an intention-to-treat analysis of protective, preventive and curative practices for malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea among children aged 5 and younger.ResultsIntervention districts reported significant net increases in the treatment of malaria (+23%), pneumonia (+19%) and diarrhoea (+13%) and improved stool disposal (+10%). Coverage rates for immunisation and vitamin A consumption saw similar improvements. By engaging communities and district managers in a common quest to solve local bottlenecks, CODES fostered demand for health services. However, limited fiscal space-constrained district managers’ ability to implement solutions identified through CODES.ConclusionData-driven district management interventions can positively impact child health outcomes, with clinically significant improvements in the treatment of malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea as well as stool disposal. The findings recommend the model’s suitability for health systems strengthening in Uganda and other decentralised contexts.Trial registration numberISRCTN15705788.

scholarly journals Incentives in Diabetic Eye Assessment by Screening (IDEAS) trial: a three-armed randomised controlled trial of financial incentives

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (15) ◽  
pp. 1-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaby Judah ◽  
Ara Darzi ◽  
Ivo Vlaev ◽  
Laura Gunn ◽  
Derek King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Financial Incentive ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Fixed Group ◽  
Screening Uptake ◽  
Invitation Letter ◽  
Screening Attendance ◽  
Randomised Controlled

BackgroundThe UK national diabetic eye screening (DES) programme invites diabetic patients aged > 12 years annually. Simple and cost-effective methods are needed to increase screening uptake. This trial tests the impact on uptake of two financial incentive schemes, based on behavioural economic principles.ObjectivesTo test whether or not financial incentives encourage screening attendance. Secondarily to understand if the type of financial incentive scheme used affects screening uptake or attracts patients with a different sociodemographic status to regular attenders. If financial incentives were found to improve attendance, then a final objective was to test cost-effectiveness.DesignThree-armed randomised controlled trial.SettingDES clinic within St Mary’s Hospital, London, covering patients from the areas of Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster.ParticipantsPatients aged ≥ 16 years, who had not attended their DES appointment for ≥ 2 years.Interventions(1) Fixed incentive – invitation letter and £10 for attending screening; (2) probabilistic (lottery) incentive – invitation letter and 1% chance of winning £1000 for attending screening; and (3) control – invitation letter only.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was screening attendance. Rates for control versus fixed and lottery incentive groups were compared using relative risk (RR) and risk difference with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsA total of 1274 patients were eligible and randomised; 223 patients became ineligible before invite and 1051 participants were invited (control,n = 435; fixed group,n = 312; lottery group,n = 304). Thirty-four (7.8%, 95% CI 5.29% to 10.34%) control, 17 (5.5%, 95% CI 2.93% to 7.97%) fixed group and 10 (3.3%, 95% CI 1.28% to 5.29%) lottery group participants attended. Participants offered incentives were 44% less likely to attend screening than controls (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.92). Examining incentive groups separately, the lottery group were 58% less likely to attend screening than controls (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.98). No significant differences were found between fixed incentive and control groups (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.39) or between fixed and lottery incentive groups (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.65 to 4.21). Subgroup analyses showed no significant associations between attendance and sociodemographic factors, including gender (female vs. male, RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.03), age (≤ 65 years vs. > 65 years, RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.08), deprivation [0–20 Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) decile vs. 30–100 IMD decile, RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.83], years registered [mean difference (MD) –0.13, 95% CI –0.69 to 0.43], and distance from screening location (MD –0.18, 95% CI –0.65 to 0.29).LimitationsDespite verification, some address details may have been outdated, and high ethnic diversity may have resulted in language barriers for participants.ConclusionsThose receiving incentives were not more likely to attend a DES than those receiving a usual invitation letter in patients who are regular non-attenders. Both fixed and lottery incentives appeared to reduce attendance. Overall, there is no evidence to support the use of financial incentives to promote diabetic retinopathy screening. Testing interventions in context, even if they appear to be supported by theory, is important.Future workFuture research, specifically in this area, should focus on identifying barriers to screening and other non-financial methods to overcome them.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN14896403.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full inHealth Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 5, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

scholarly journals Randomised controlled trial of effect of Baby Check on use of health services in first 6 months of life

BMJ ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 318 (7200) ◽  
pp. 1740-1744 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Thomson ◽  
S. Ross ◽  
P. Wilson ◽  
A. McConnachie ◽  
R. Watson
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Use Of Health Services

scholarly journals A Community-enabled Readiness for first 1000 Days Learning Ecosystem (CRADLE) for first-time families: study protocol of a three-arm randomised controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
See Ling Loy ◽  
Thilagamangai ◽  
Joyce Teo ◽  
Sze Wern Chan ◽  
Nurul Khairani Abdul Razak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Child Health ◽  
Linear Models ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Text Messages ◽  
Feeding Practice ◽  
Learning Ecosystem ◽  
Mental Wellness ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
First Time

Abstract Background Enhanced parenting self-efficacy (PSE) contributes to positive parenting and future parental-child health. First-time parents, in particular, are in need of support since the pregnancy until post-delivery to strengthen their early PSE. However, there is a lack of effective and sustainable relevant programmes in the community. The Community-enabled Readiness for first 1000 Days Learning Ecosystem (CRADLE) aims to develop a self-learning eco-community throughout the pregnancy and early childhood to promote PSE among first-time parents. We apply choice architecture strategy using behavioural nudges and midwife-led continuity care during the first 1000 days, and test their effects on PSE and mother-child health for first-time families in Singapore. Methods This three-arm randomised controlled trial will recruit up to 750 pregnant women from the KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive: (1) standard routine care; (2) behavioural nudges (text messages) along with the use of a social media platform; or (3) midwife-led continuity care involving individualised teleconferencing sessions, during pregnancy and post-delivery. Using web-based questionnaires, participants will be assessed for baseline socio-demography and health status in the first visit, with follow-up assessments in the third trimester, at birth, 6-week (primary end-point), 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month post-delivery. The primary outcome is PSE. Secondary outcomes include health and birth experience, mental wellness, feeding practice, maternal and child nutritional status. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses will be performed using general linear models to test the effects of interventions across three arms. Recruitment has begun in June 2020 and is estimated to complete in September 2022. Discussion This study may identify a sustainable effective strategy in the community by helping first-time parents to have a positive experience during the pregnancy, childbirth and parenthood, leading to an enhanced PSE and health outcomes for both mother and child. Findings from this study will provide insight into the implementation of early parenting and mother-child care programmes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04275765. Registered on 19 February 2020.

Effect of handwashing on child health: a randomised controlled trial

The Lancet ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 366 (9481) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P Luby ◽  
Mubina Agboatwalla ◽  
Daniel R Feikin ◽  
John Painter ◽  
Ward Billhimer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Child Health ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomised Controlled

scholarly journals Weight-management interventions in primary care: a pilot randomised controlled trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (562) ◽  
pp. e157-e166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran Nanchahal ◽  
Joy Townsend ◽  
Louise Letley ◽  
David Haslam ◽  
Kaye Wellings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Weight Management ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Management Interventions ◽  
Randomised Controlled

scholarly journals Evidence generation for the clinical impact of myCOPD in patients with mild, moderate and newly diagnosed COPD: a randomised controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 00460-2020
Author(s):  
Michael G. Crooks ◽  
Jack Elkes ◽  
William Storrar ◽  
Kay Roy ◽  
Mal North ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Management Interventions ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Impact

Self-management interventions in COPD aim to improve patients' knowledge, skills and confidence to make correct decisions, thus improving health status and outcomes. myCOPD is a web-based self-management app known to improve inhaler use and exercise capacity in individuals with more severe COPD.We explored the impact of myCOPD in patients with mild–moderate or recently diagnosed COPD through a 12-week, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial of myCOPD compared with usual care. The co-primary outcomes were between-group differences in mean COPD assessment test (CAT) score at 90 days and critical inhaler errors. Key secondary outcomes were app usage and patient activation measurement (PAM) score.Sixty patients were randomised (29 myCOPD, 31 usual care). Groups were balanced for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 % pred) but there was baseline imbalance between groups for exacerbation frequency and CAT score. There was no significant adjusted mean difference in CAT score at study completion, −1.27 (95% CI −4.47–1.92, p=0.44) lower in myCOPD. However, an increase in app use was associated with greater CAT score improvement. The odds of ≥1 critical inhaler error was lower in the myCOPD arm (adjusted OR 0.30 (95% CI 0.09–1.06, p=0.061)). The adjusted odds ratio for being in a higher PAM level at 90 days was 1.65 (95% CI 0.46–5.85) in favour of myCOPD.The small sample size and phenotypic difference between groups limited our ability to demonstrate statistically significant evidence of benefit beyond inhaler technique. However, our findings provide important insights into associations between increased app use and clinically meaningful benefit warranting further study in real world settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document