scholarly journals Systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report physical activity questionnaires in healthy adult populations: Figure 1

BMJ Open ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. e008430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoë Silsbury ◽  
Robert Goldsmith ◽  
Alison Rushton
2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 2317-2346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo C. Sattler ◽  
Johannes Jaunig ◽  
Estelle D. Watson ◽  
Mireille N. M. van Poppel ◽  
Lidwine B. Mokkink ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e012655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Júlia Caetano Martins ◽  
Larissa Tavares Aguiar ◽  
Sylvie Nadeau ◽  
Aline Alvim Scianni ◽  
Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 476-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Júlia Caetano Martins ◽  
Larissa Tavares Aguiar ◽  
Sylvie Nadeau ◽  
Aline Alvim Scianni ◽  
Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1271-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo C. Sattler ◽  
Johannes Jaunig ◽  
Christoph Tösch ◽  
Estelle D. Watson ◽  
Lidwine B. Mokkink ◽  
...  

Nutrients ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madeline Cooke ◽  
Alison Coates ◽  
Elizabeth Buckley ◽  
Jonathan Buckley

Lutein is a carotenoid that reduces the risk of some chronic diseases, possibly by altering physical activity behavior. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of studies examining the relationship between lutein status (dietary intake/blood concentration) and physical activity. Peer-reviewed studies published in Medline, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, and Embase were included if they reported a measure of association between lutein status and physical activity. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven reported positive associations, three reported mixed results, and three reported no association. Two studies used objective measures of lutein status (blood concentration) and physical activity (accelerometry) and reported positive associations, with correlations of ≥0.36 and differences of ≥57% in physical activity between upper and lower tertiles. Studies using self-report measures reported weaker correlations (r = 0.06 to 0.25), but still more physical activity (18% to ≥600% higher) in those with the highest compared with the lowest lutein status. Higher lutein status may be associated with higher levels of physical activity, which may contribute to a reduced risk of chronic disease.


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 2797-2842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisan M. Hidding ◽  
Mai. J. M. Chinapaw ◽  
Mireille N. M. van Poppel ◽  
Lidwine B. Mokkink ◽  
Teatske M. Altenburg

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Laake ◽  
Joanna Fleming

Abstract Background Physical inactivity is the fourth leading risk factor for global mortality. Reducing sedentary behaviour and increasing physical activity are efficacious for improving many physical and mental health conditions including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and depression. Reducing sedentary behaviour and increasing physical activity can also be effective at reducing obesity; however, sedentary behaviour and reduced physical activity are also associated with mortality independently. Despite this, most adults in the UK do not currently meet the UK Chief Medical Officers’ guidelines for weekly physical activity. As most adults visit their general practitioner at least once a year, the primary care consultation provides a unique opportunity to deliver exercise referral or physical activity promotion interventions. This is a protocol for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials for the effectiveness of physical activity promotion and referral in primary care. Methods A comprehensive literature search of Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science (Core Collection), Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) will be conducted for studies with a minimum follow-up of 12 months that report physical activity as an outcome measure (by either self-report or objective measures) including an intention to treat analysis. The authors will screen papers, first by title and abstract and then by full text, independently assess studies for inclusion, appraise risk of bias and extract data. The quality of the evidence will be assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations) approach. The primary outcome will be participation in physical activity at 12 months. Pooled effects will be calculated using random effects models. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and for presentation at UK national primary care conferences. Discussion This systematic review and meta-analyses will summarise the evidence for the effectiveness of physical activity promotion and referral as interventions for improving physical activity, as well as whether studies using objective measures of physical activity have similar effects to those studies using self-report measures. This knowledge has importance for primary care clinicians, patients and, given the focus of the recent NHS long-term plan on preventive medicine, those making policy decisions. Systematic review registration The protocol is registered with PROSPERO the international prospective register of systematic reviews, ID CRD42019130831


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document