scholarly journals Disentangling the determinants of interest and willingness-to-pay for breast cancer susceptibility testing in the general population: a cross-sectional Web-based survey among women of Québec (Canada)

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e016662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolyane Blouin-Bougie ◽  
Nabil Amara ◽  
Karine Bouchard ◽  
Jacques Simard ◽  
Michel Dorval

ObjectivesTo identify common and specific individual factors that favour or impede women’s interest in and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for breast cancer susceptibility testing (BCST) and to identify the most impactful factors on both outcome measures.Design and methodsThis study used a self-administered cross-sectional Web-based questionnaire that included hypothetical scenarios about the availability of a new genetic test for breast cancer.ParticipantsFrench-speaking women of the general population of Québec (Canada), aged between 35 and 69 years, were identified from a Web-based panel (2410 met the selection criteria, 1160 were reached and 1031 completed the survey).MeasuresThe outcomes are the level of interest in and the range of WTP for BCST. Three categories of individual factors identified in the literature were used as potential explanatory factors, that is, demographic, clinical and psychosocial.ResultsDescriptive statistics indicated that the vast majority of sampled women are interested in BCST (90%). Among those, more than half of them are willing-to-pay for such a test (57%). The regression models pointed out several factors associated with both outcomes (eg, age, income, family history, locus of control-powerful others) and marginal effects were used to highlight the most impactful factors for each outcome.ConclusionThe results of this study provide a proxy of the readiness of women of the general population to use and to pay for BCST. They also offer insights for developing inclusive and specific strategies to foster informed decision-making and guide the services offered by health organisations corresponding to women’s preferences and needs.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 2868-2876 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Geller ◽  
B A Bernhardt ◽  
T Doksum ◽  
K J Helzlsouer ◽  
P Wilcox ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To determine what consumers and providers would want to discuss about breast cancer susceptibility testing (BCST) and their preferred role in testing decisions. METHODS We surveyed 426 at-risk women, 143 nurse practitioners, and 296 physicians in five specialties in Maryland. RESULTS All groups believe it is important to discuss how the chance of breast cancer can be reduced and what the chances are of getting breast cancer if the test is positive. Both provider groups attributed more importance than consumers to discussing whether cancer can occur if the test is negative. Discussing the risk of depression and anxiety was more important to providers than consumers. Eighty-two percent of women would want their providers to make a recommendation about testing, but only 43% of nurse practitioners and 68% of physicians would do so. Eighteen percent of physicians underestimated the importance of informed consent for testing and 34% of discussing the risk of insurance discrimination. Fewer than 6% of women, if found to have a mutation, would be likely to undergo prophylactic mastectomy, whereas 12% of nurse practitioners and 34% of physicians would be likely to recommend such surgery. One third of respondents in all three groups supported testing a 13-year old daughter of a mutation-carrier. CONCLUSION Physicians should place greater value on informed consent and discussing practical aspects of testing, and physicians and nurse practitioners should pay more attention to the limitations of testing children, insurance discrimination, and consumers' desire for provider recommendations. In light of the limited discordance between nurse practitioners and consumers, nurse practitioners can play an increasing role in education and counseling about BCST.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela R. Bradbury ◽  
Linda J. Patrick-Miller ◽  
Brian L. Egleston ◽  
Laura DiGiovanni ◽  
Jamie Brower ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail Geller ◽  
Misha Strauss ◽  
Barbara A. Bernhardt ◽  
Neil A. Holtzman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document