scholarly journals Outcomes of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and acute myocardial infarction: a propensity score-matched, 15-year nationwide population-based study in Asia

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. e019741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Chien-Chia Wu ◽  
Tien-Hsing Chen ◽  
Michael Wu ◽  
Shao-Wei Chen ◽  
Chih-Hsiang Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Cardiac Transplant ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Increased Risk

ObjectivesHypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) entails thickening of the myocardium and an increased risk of ischaemia. However, the prognosis of patients with HCM with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is incompletely understood.MethodsMedical information was retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database in 1997–2011. The exclusion criteria were patients <18 years old, and history of AMI, coronary intervention, aortic valve disease, disease of the pericardium, heart surgery, device implantation, venous thromboembolism, cardiac transplant, congenital heart disease and end-stage renal disease on dialysis. Patients with HCM with AMI were compared with propensity score (PS)-matched patients with AMI without HCM. The primary endpoints were in-hospital and 1-year cardiovascular events.ResultsIn total, 201 166 patients were admitted for AMI. There were 177 058 patients with new-onset AMI, 257 with HCM and 176 801 without HCM after exclusion criteria. Using 1:4 PS matching, the study population consisted of patients with AMI, 257 with HCM and 1028 without HCM. Patients with AMI with HCM received significantly less coronary intervention (OR=0.46; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.65; p<0.001), coronary intervention with stenting (OR=0.33; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.57; p<0.001) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OR=0.22; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.90; p=0.036), and fewer episodes of shock (OR=0.64; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.86; p=0.003) and in-hospital death (OR=0.46; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.70; p<0.001), compared with patients with AMI without HCM. Specifically, for patients with HCM with AMI, AMI occurred predominantly (82.5%) in the form of ischaemia without requiring coronary stenting. Patients with AMI with HCM had significantly better survival than patients without HCM (HR=0.66; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.85; p=0.001) during the 1-year follow-up.ConclusionsThis is the first PS-matched study to compare the prognosis of patients with AMI with and without HCM. Compared with patients with AMI without HCM, patients with HCM had significantly better in-hospital and within 1-year outcomes.

scholarly journals Role of diuretics on long-term mortality may differ in volume status in patients with acute myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Kawai ◽  
D Nakatani ◽  
T Yamada ◽  
T Watanabe ◽  
T Morita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Plasma Volume ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Volume Status ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Abstract Background Diuretics has been reported to have a potential for an activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the sympathetic nervous system, leading to a possibility of poor clinical outcome in patients with cardiovascular disease. However, few data are available on clinical impact of diuretics on long-term outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on plasma volume status. Methods To address the issue, a total of 3,416 survived patients with AMI who were registered to a large database of the Osaka Acute Coronary Insufficiency Study (OACIS) were studied. Plasma volume status was assessed with the estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) that was calculated at discharge as follows: actual PV = (1 − hematocrit) × [a + (b × body weight)] (a=1530 in males and a=864 in females, b=41.0 in males and b=47.9 in females); ideal PV = c × body weight (c=39 in males and c=40 in females), and ePVS = [(actual PV − ideal PV)/ideal PV] × 100 (%). Multivariable Cox regression analysis and propensity score matching were performed to account for imbalances in covariates. The endpoint was all-cause of death (ACD) within 5 years. Results During a median follow-up period of 855±656 days, 193 patients had ACD. In whole population, there was no significant difference in long-term mortality risk between patients with and without diuretics in both multivariate cox regression model and propensity score matching population. When patients were divided into 2 groups according to ePVS with a median value of 4.2%, 46 and 147 patients had ACD in groups with low ePVS and high ePVS, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that use of diuretics was independently associated with an increased risk of ACD in low ePVS group, (HR: 2.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22–5.63, p=0.01), but not in high ePVS group (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.44–1.10, p=0.12). These observations were consistent in the propensity-score matched cohorts; the 5-year mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with diuretics than those without among low ePVS group (4.7% vs 1.7%, p=0.041), but not among high ePVS group (8.0% vs 10.3%, p=0.247). Conclusion Prescription of diuretics at discharge was associated with increased risk of 5-year mortality in patients with AMI without PV expansion, but not with PV expansion. The role of diuretics on long-term mortality may differ in plasma volume status. Therefore, prescription of diuretics after AMI may be considered based on plasma volume status. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 3522: Transfer Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Do Not Impact Hospital Quality Measurements, Despite Being Sicker Than Directly Admitted Patients

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Creighton Don ◽  
Douglas Stewart ◽  
Susan Heckbert ◽  
Charles Maynard ◽  
Richard Goss
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Hospital Quality ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Hospital Level ◽  
Risk Of Death

BACKGROUND Studies of hospital quality and national performance measures for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) frequently exclude transfer patients. Little is known about the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with AMI transferred for revascularization. HYPOTHESIS Transfer patients have greater clinical comorbidity and worse hospital survival than non-transfer patients, and negatively impact hospital quality measures. METHODS A retrospective-cohort study was performed using all patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who underwent coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in Washington State from 2002 – 2005. Data on clinical and procedural characteristics, medications, and complications were obtained from the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Hospitals were compared by rates of death and discharge with aspirin, beta-blockers, lipid lowering agents, and ACE inhibitors. Logistic regression was used for adjusted analysis. RESULTS Of patients undergoing revascularization for AMI, 7080 were directly admitted and 2910 were transferred. Diabetes (23.4 v. 19.7%, p<0.01), hypertension (61.3 v. 55.7%, p<0.01), and thrombolysis (32.3 v. 3.4%, p <0.01) were greater among transfers. Transfers presented with a higher rate of left main and three-vessel disease, intra-aortic balloon pump use (6.4 v. 3.6%, p<0.01) and underwent CABG more frequently (15.4 v. 5.5%, p <0.01). Transfer patients had a lower risk of death (3.9 v. 4.9%, p=0.03), but no difference in discharge medication prescription. Adjusting for major risk factors, procedure, and hospital type, transfers had a similar risk for in-hospital death compared to non-transfers (OR 0.9, CI 0.5 – 1.6). Hospitals with a high percentage of transfers treated higher-risk patients, but had similar outcomes to those with few transfers. Excluding transfers from the hospital-level analysis did not appreciably change these results. CONCLUSION Transfers were higher-risk, but had similar in-hospital mortality and were equally likely to receive appropriate medication at discharge compared to directly admitted patients. Inclusion of transfers did not affect hospital-level inpatient mortality or measurements of adherence to quality guidelines.

scholarly journals A kórelőzményben szereplő revascularisatiós műtét rövid és hosszú távú prognosztikai jelentősége szívinfarktus miatt kezelt betegekben

2021 ◽  
Vol 162 (5) ◽  
pp. 177-184
Author(s):  
András Jánosi ◽  
Tamás Ferenci ◽  
András Komócsi ◽  
Péter Andréka
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
St Elevation

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: A szívinfarktust megelőző revascularisatiós beavatkozások prognosztikai jelentőségével kapcsolatban kevés elemzés ismeretes, hazai adatokat eddig nem közöltek. Célkitűzés: A szerzők a Nemzeti Szívinfarktus Regiszter adatait felhasználva elemezték a koszorúér-revascularisatiós szívműtétet (CABG) túlélt betegek prognózisát heveny szívinfarktusban. Módszer: Az adatbázisban 2014. 01. 01. és 2017. 12. 31. között 55 599 beteg klinikai és kezelési adatait rögzítették: 23 437 betegnél (42,2%) ST-elevációval járó infarktus (STEMI), 32 162 betegnél (57,8%) ST-elevációval nem járó infarktus (NSTEMI) miatt került sor a kórházi kezelésre. Vizsgáltuk a CABG után fellépő infarktus miatt kezelt betegek klinikai adatait és prognózisát, amelyeket azon betegek adataival hasonlítottunk össze, akiknél nem szerepelt szívműtét a kórelőzményben (kontrollcsoport). Eredmények: A betegek többsége mindkét infarktustípusban férfi volt (62%, illetve 59%). Az indexinfarktust megelőzően a betegek 5,33%-ánál (n = 2965) történt CABG, amely az NSTEMI-betegeknél volt gyakoribb (n = 2357; 7,3%). A CABG-csoportba tartozó betegek idősebbek voltak, esetükben több társbetegséget (magas vérnyomás, diabetes mellitus, perifériás érbetegség) rögzítettek. Az indexinfarktus esetén a katéteres koszorúér-intervenció a kontrollcsoport STEMI-betegeiben gyakoribb volt a CABG-csoporthoz viszonyítva (84% vs. 71%). Az utánkövetés 12 hónapja során a betegek 4,7–12,2%-ában újabb infarktus, 13,7–17,3%-ában újabb katéteres koszorúér-intervenció történt. Az utánkövetés alatt a CABG-csoportban magasabbnak találtuk a halálozást. A halálozást befolyásoló tényezők hatásának korrigálására Cox-féle regressziós analízist, illetve ’propensity score matching’ módszert alkalmaztunk. Mindkét módszerrel történt elemzés azt mutatta, hogy a kórelőzményben szereplő koszorúér-revascularisatiós műtét nem befolyásolta a túlélést. Amennyiben a beteg kórelőzményében szerepelt a koszorúérműtét, az indexinfarktus nagyobb eséllyel volt NSTEMI, mint STEMI (HR: 1,612; CI 1,464–1,774; p<0,001). Következtetés: A kórelőzményben szereplő koszorúér-revascularisatiós műtét nem befolyásolta a szívinfarktus miatt kezelt betegek életkilátásait. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(5): 177–184. Summary. Introduction: Little analysis is known about the prognostic significance of revascularization interventions before myocardial infarction; no domestic data have been reported so far. Method: The authors use data from the Hungarian Myocardial Infarction Registry to analyze the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction who had previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Between 01. 01. 2014. and 31. 12. 2017, 55 599 patients were recorded in the Registry: 23 437 patients (42.2%) had ST-elevation infarction (STEMI) and 31 162 patients (57.8%) had non-ST-elevation infarction (NSTEMI). The clinical data and prognosis of patients treated for infarction after CABG were compared with those of patients without a CABG history. Results: The majority of patients were male (59% and 60%, respectively). Prior to index infarction, CABG occurred in 5.33% of patients (n = 2965), which was more common in NSTEMI (n = 2357; 7.3%). The CABG patients were older and had more comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease). For index infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention was more common in STEMI patients in the control group compared to CABG (84% vs. 71%). At 12 months of follow-up, 4.7–12.2% of patients had reinfarction, and 13.7–17.3% had another percutaneous coronary intervention. During the full follow-up, the CABG group had higher mortality. Cox regression analysis and propensity score matching were used to correct for the effect of other factors influencing mortality. Both analyses showed CABG did not affect survival. In the CABG group, the index infarction was more likely to be NSTEMI than STEMI (HR: 1.612; CI 1.464–1.774; p<0.001). Conclusion: The history of CABG does not affect the life expectancy of patients treated for an acute myocardial infarction. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(5): 177–184.

P5504Comparison of in-hospital clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction between nonagenarians and octogenarians: a propensity-score matched analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Seguchi ◽  
K Sakakura ◽  
K Yamamoto ◽  
Y Taniguchi ◽  
H Wada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Very Elderly ◽  
Hospital Outcomes

Abstract Background Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the very elderly is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Because the majority of study population in clinical researches focusing on the very elderly with AMI were octogenarians, clinical evidences regarding AMI in nonagenarians are sparse. The aim of the present study was to compare in-hospital clinical outcomes of AMI between octogenarians and nonagenarians. Methods We included consecutive 415 very elderly (≥80 years) patients with AMI, and divided into the nonagenarian group (n=38) and the octogenarian group (n=377). Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Furthermore, we used propensity-score matching to find the matched octogenarian group (n=38). Results Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) to the culprit of AMI were similarly performed between the nonagenarian (86.8%) and octogenarian (87.0%) groups The incidence of in-hospital death in the nonagenarian group (13.2%) was similar to that in the octogenarian group (14.6%) (P=0.811). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the nonagenarian group (7.4±4.2 days) than that in the octogenarian group (15.4±19.4 days) (P<0.001). After using the propensity-score matching, the incidence of in-hospital death was less in the nonagenarian group (13.2%) than in the matched octogenarian group (21.1%) without reaching statistical significance (P=0.361). The length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the nonagenarian group (7.4±4.2 days) than in the matched octogenarian group (17.8±37.0 days) (P=0.01). Clinical outcomes Nonagenarian group (n=38) Octogenarian group (n=377) P value In-hospital death, n (%) 5 (13.2) 55 (14.6) 0.811 Length of hospital stay (days) 7.4±4.2 15.4±19.4 <0.001 Length of CCU stay (days) 3.3±2.5 4.7±5.1 0.109 LVEF (%) 48.2±9.2 50.8±13.7 0.152 Peak CPK (U/L) 1424.8±1580.8 1640.1±2394.4 0.912 CCU indicates Coronary care unit; LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction; CPK, Creatine kinase. Flow-chart Conclusions The in-hospital mortality of nonagenarians with AMI was comparable to that of octogenarians with AMI. In-hospital outcomes in nonagenarians with AMI may be acceptable as long as acute medical management including PCI to the culprit of AMI is performed. Acknowledgement/Funding None

scholarly journals Serum lactic acid level predicts poor myocardial perfusion and in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Y Liu ◽  
C F Dai ◽  
Z W Chen ◽  
J Y Qian ◽  
J B Ge
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Lactic Acid ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Acid Level ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Lactic Acid Level ◽  
Hospital Outcomes ◽  
Grace Risk Score

Abstract Background Elevated serum lactic acid level is associated with poor outcomes in patients with critical diseases like shock. However, the clinical implication of this biomarker in patients with acute myocardial infarction remains unclear. Purpose We aimed to explore the predictive power of serum lactic acid level on admission for in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Methods Consecutive patients undergoing pPCI with available data on serum lactid acid level were evaluated for eligbility in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was all-cause death during hospitalization. Enzymatic infarct size and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, defined as a combination of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and unplanned repeated revascularization) were considered secondary outcomes. Independent preditors of in-hospital death were determined by multiple logisic regression analysis. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to demonstrate the association. The predictive power of serum latictic acid level for in-hospital death was evaluated through receiver operator characteristic curve, which generated C-statictic. A combination model was further constructed by adding serum latictic acid level to the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score (LA-GRACE risk score). The linear dependence between serum lactic acids level and othe clinical variables was analysed using Spearman rank correlation. Results Of the 302 patients enrolled in the current analysis, 15 (5.0%) died during hospitalization. Serum lactic acid level (OR=1.657, 95% CI: 1.115 to 2.463, p=0.012)and left ventricular ejection fraction (OR=0.858, 95% CI: 0.767 to 0.959, p=0.007) were the only two independent predictors of in-hospital death. The C-statistic of serum lactic acid level for predicting in-hospital death was 0.886 (95% CI: 0.793 to 0.979). The LA-GRACE risk score improved the C-statistic of the GRACE score from 0.898 to 0.911 (p=0.294), with continuous net reclassification improvement of 0.567 (p=0.023) and integrated discrimination improvement of 0.206 (p=0.003). High serum lactic acid level was also asscoiated with larger enzymatic infarct size (p=0.002) and MACE (p=0.004). Further, it significantly correlated with white blood cell counts (r=0.264, p&lt;0.001), serum creatinine level (r=0.189, p=0.001), and systolic blood pressure (r=−0.122, p=0.034). Conclusion Serum lactic acid level on admission is asscoiated with poor myocardial perfusion and in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing pPCI. It may contribute to better risk stratification in these populations. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This study was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (Grant No: 2019YFC0840601 and 2014CBA02003), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 81870267, 81970295, 81521001, 81670318 and 81570314), Grant of Shanghai Shenkang on Key Clinical Research Project (Grant No: SHDC2020CR2015A and SHDC12019104), Grant of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (Grant No: 19MC1910300, 18411950200 and 20JC1410800), Key Medical and Health Projects of Xiamen Province (No: 3502Z20204004), Grant of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (Grant No: 2017YQ057), Grant of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University (Grant No: 2018ZSLC01), VG Funding of Clinical Trials (2017-CCA-VG-036) and Merck Funding (Xinxin-merck-fund-051). ROC of lactic acid and GRACE score

Long versus short dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor and coronary revascularization: Insights from the RENAMI registry

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 696-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio D'Ascenzo ◽  
Maurizio Bertaina ◽  
Francesco Fioravanti ◽  
Federica Bongiovanni ◽  
Sergio Raposeiras-Roubin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Introduction The benefits of short versus long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) based on the third generation P2Y12 antagonists prasugrel or ticagrelor, in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention remain to be clearly defined due to current evidences limited to patients treated with clopidogrel. Methods All acute coronary syndrome patients from the REgistry of New Antiplatelets in patients with Myocardial Infarction (RENAMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with aspirin, prasugrel or ticagrelor were stratified according to DAPT duration, that is, shorter than 12 months (D1 group), 12 months (D2 group) and longer than 12 months (D3 group). The three groups were compared before and after propensity score matching. Net adverse clinical events (NACEs), defined as a combination of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and major bleedings (including therefore all cause death, myocardial infarction and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3–5 bleeding), were the primary end points, MACEs (a composite of all cause death and myocardial infarction) the secondary one. Single components of NACEs were co-secondary end points, along with BARC 2–5 bleeding, cardiovascular death and stent thrombosis. Results A total of 4424 patients from the RENAMI registry with available data on DAPT duration were included in the model. After propensity score matching, 628 patients from each group were selected. After 20 months of follow up, DAPT for 12 months and DAPT for longer than 12 months significantly reduced the risk of NACE (D1 11.6% vs. D2 6.7% vs. D3 7.2%, p = 0.003) and MACE (10% vs. 6.2% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001) compared with DAPT for less than 12 months. These differences were driven by a reduced risk of all cause death (7.8% vs. 1.3% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001), cardiovascular death (5.1% vs. 1.0% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.0001) and recurrent myocardial infarction (8.3% vs. 5.2% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.002). NACEs were lower with longer DAPT despite a higher risk of BARC 2–5 bleedings (4.6% vs. 5.7% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.04) and a trend towards a higher risk of BARC 3–5 bleedings (2.4% vs. 3.3% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.06). These results were not consistent for female patients and those older than 75 years old, due to an increased risk of bleedings which exceeded the reduction in myocardial infarction. Conclusion In unselected real world acute coronary syndrome patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, DAPT with prasugrel or ticagrelor prolonged beyond 12 months markedly reduces fatal and non-fatal ischaemic events, offsetting the increased risk deriving from the higher bleeding risk. On the contrary, patients >75 years old and female ones showed a less favourable risk–benefit ratio for longer DAPT due to excess of bleedings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document