scholarly journals Protocol for the process and feasibility evaluations of a new model of primary care service delivery for managing pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (PARTNER) using a mixed methods approach

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e034526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn L Bowden ◽  
Thorlene Egerton ◽  
Rana S Hinman ◽  
Kim L Bennell ◽  
Andrew M Briggs ◽  
...  

IntroductionThis protocol outlines the rationale, design and methods for the process and feasibility evaluations of the primary care management on knee pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (PARTNER) study. PARTNER is a randomised controlled trial to evaluate a new model of service delivery (the PARTNER model) against ‘usual care’. PARTNER is designed to encourage greater uptake of key evidence-based non-surgical treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA) in primary care. The intervention supports general practitioners (GPs) to gain an understanding of the best management options available through online professional development. Their patients receive telephone advice and support for OA management by a centralised, multidisciplinary ‘Care Support Team’. We will conduct concurrent process and feasibility evaluations to understand the implementation of this new complex health intervention, identify issues for consideration when interpreting the effectiveness outcomes and develop recommendations for future implementation, cost effectiveness and scalability.Methods and analysisThe UK Medical Research Council Framework for undertaking a process evaluation of complex interventions and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) frameworks inform the design of these evaluations. We use a mixed-methods approach including analysis of survey data, administrative records, consultation records and semistructured interviews with GPs and their enrolled patients. The analysis will examine fidelity and dose of the intervention, observations of trial setup and implementation and the quality of the care provided. We will also examine details of ‘usual care’. The semistructured interviews will be analysed using thematic and content analysis to draw out themes around implementation and acceptability of the model.Ethics and disseminationThe primary and substudy protocols have been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of The University of Sydney (2016/959 and 2019/503). Our findings will be disseminated to national and international partners and stakeholders, who will also assist with wider dissemination of our results across all levels of healthcare. Specific findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conferences, and via training for healthcare professionals delivering OA management programmes. This evaluation is crucial to explaining the PARTNER study results, and will be used to determine the feasibility of rolling-out the intervention in an Australian healthcare context.Trial registration numberACTRN12617001595303; Pre-results.

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 411-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Lieberthal ◽  
Tom Karagiannis ◽  
Evan Bilheimer ◽  
Manisha Verma ◽  
Colleen Payton ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 499-511
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Bogenschutz ◽  
Parthenia A. Dinora ◽  
Khalilah R. Johnson

Abstract Case management (CM) is one of the most commonly used services by individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), but little is known about the workers who provide CM. This study used a mixed methods approach to gain understanding of the CM workforce in one U.S. state. An online survey was completed by 35 IDD service directors (87.5% of directors in the state); and 113 CMs and CM supervisors participated in semistructured interviews and focus groups. Results indicated an annual crude separation rate of 28.2%, and participants often complained that turnover resulted in caseload sizes that prevented optimal outcomes for people with IDD. A limited applicant pool, duties focused on regulatory compliance, and inadequate wages were cited as major challenges for CMs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1453-1458
Author(s):  
Steve Landers ◽  
Rachael Hely ◽  
Richard Page ◽  
Nick Maister ◽  
Andrew Hely ◽  
...  

Physiotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. 101-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Knoop ◽  
M. van der Leeden ◽  
M. van der Esch ◽  
M. de Rooij ◽  
W.F. Peter ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document