scholarly journals 13 Validating the heart rate variability risk prediction model and accelerated diagnostic protocol (HRVPM-ADP) for chest pain patients at the ED

Author(s):  
Nan Liu ◽  
Cui Shan Seow ◽  
Zhi Xiong Koh ◽  
Dagang Guo ◽  
Swee Han Lim ◽  
...  
Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (23) ◽  
pp. e10866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mas’uud Ibnu Samsudin ◽  
Nan Liu ◽  
Sumanth Madhusudan Prabhakar ◽  
Shu-Ling Chong ◽  
Weng Kit Lye ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaona Jia ◽  
Mirza Mansoor Baig ◽  
Farhaan Mirza ◽  
Hamid GholamHosseini

Background and Objective. Current cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk models are typically based on traditional laboratory-based predictors. The objective of this research was to identify key risk factors that affect the CVD risk prediction and to develop a 10-year CVD risk prediction model using the identified risk factors. Methods. A Cox proportional hazard regression method was applied to generate the proposed risk model. We used the dataset from Framingham Original Cohort of 5079 men and women aged 30-62 years, who had no overt symptoms of CVD at the baseline; among the selected cohort 3189 had a CVD event. Results. A 10-year CVD risk model based on multiple risk factors (such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, systolic blood pressure (SBP), cigarettes per day, pulse rate, and diabetes) was developed in which heart rate was identified as one of the novel risk factors. The proposed model achieved a good discrimination and calibration ability with C-index (receiver operating characteristic (ROC)) being 0.71 in the validation dataset. We validated the model via statistical and empirical validation. Conclusion. The proposed CVD risk prediction model is based on standard risk factors, which could help reduce the cost and time required for conducting the clinical/laboratory tests. Healthcare providers, clinicians, and patients can use this tool to see the 10-year risk of CVD for an individual. Heart rate was incorporated as a novel predictor, which extends the predictive ability of the past existing risk equations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Tadashi Sakamoto ◽  
Nan Liu ◽  
Zhi Xiong Koh ◽  
Dagang Guo ◽  
Micah Liam Arthur Heldeweg ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chu En Ting ◽  
Nan Liu ◽  
Zhi Xiong Koh ◽  
Dagang Guo ◽  
Janson Cheng Ji NG ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nuur Azreen Paiman ◽  
◽  
Azian Hariri ◽  
Ibrahim Masood ◽  
Arma Noor ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. S1112-S1113
Author(s):  
A.A. Nasrallah ◽  
M. Mansour ◽  
C.H. Ayoub ◽  
N. Abou Heidar ◽  
J.A. Najdi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica K. Sexton ◽  
Michael Coory ◽  
Sailesh Kumar ◽  
Gordon Smith ◽  
Adrienne Gordon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Despite advances in the care of women and their babies in the past century, an estimated 1.7 million babies are born still each year throughout the world. A robust method to estimate a pregnant woman’s individualized risk of late-pregnancy stillbirth is needed to inform decision-making around the timing of birth to reduce the risk of stillbirth from 35 weeks of gestation in Australia, a high-resource setting. Methods This is a protocol for a cross-sectional study of all late-pregnancy births in Australia (2005–2015) from 35 weeks of gestation including 5188 stillbirths among 3.1 million births at an estimated rate of 1.7 stillbirths per 1000 births. A multivariable logistic regression model will be developed in line with current TransparentReporting of a multivariable prediction model forIndividualPrognosis orDiagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines to estimate the gestation-specific probability of stillbirth with prediction intervals. Candidate predictors were identified from systematic reviews and clinical consultation and will be described through univariable regression analysis. To generate a final model, elimination by backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression will be performed. The model will be internally validated using bootstrapping with 1000 repetitions and externally validated using a temporally unique dataset. Overall model performance will be assessed with R2, calibration, and discrimination. Calibration will be reported using a calibration plot with 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05). Discrimination will be measured by the C-statistic and area underneath the receiver-operator curves. Clinical usefulness will be reported as positive and negative predictive values, and a decision curve analysis will be considered. Discussion A robust method to predict a pregnant woman’s individualized risk of late-pregnancy stillbirth is needed to inform timely, appropriate care to reduce stillbirth. Among existing prediction models designed for obstetric use, few have been subject to internal and external validation and many fail to meet recommended reporting standards. In developing a risk prediction model for late-gestation stillbirth with both providers and pregnant women in mind, we endeavor to develop a validated model for clinical use in Australia that meets current reporting standards.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document