scholarly journals Associations with sight-threatening diabetic macular oedema among Indigenous adults with type 2 diabetes attending an Indigenous primary care clinic in remote Australia: a Centre of Research Excellence in Diabetic Retinopathy and Telehealth Eye and Associated Medical Services Network study

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000559
Author(s):  
Laima Brazionis ◽  
Anthony Keech ◽  
Christopher Ryan ◽  
Alex Brown ◽  
David O'Neal ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo identify factors associated with sight-threatening diabetic macular oedema (STDM) in Indigenous Australians attending an Indigenous primary care clinic in remote Australia.Methods and analysisA cross-sectional study design of retinopathy screening data and routinely-collected clinical data among 236 adult Indigenous participants with type 2 diabetes (35.6% men) set in one Indigenous primary care clinic in remote Australia. The primary outcome variable was STDM assessed from retinal images.ResultsAge (median (range)) was 48 (21–86) years, and known diabetes duration (median (range)) was 8.0 (0–24) years. Prevalence of STDM was high (14.8%) and similar in men and women. STDM was associated with longer diabetes duration (11.7 vs 7.9 years, respectively; p<0.001) and markers of renal impairment: abnormal estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) (62.9 vs 38.3%, respectively; p=0.007), severe macroalbuminuria (>300 mg/mmol) (20.6 vs 5.7%, respectively; p=0.014) and chronic kidney disease (25.7 vs 12.2%, respectively; p=0.035). Some clinical factors differed by sex: anaemia was more prevalent in women. A higher proportion of men were smokers, prescribed statins and had increased albuminuria. Men had higher blood pressure, but lower glycated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and body mass index, than women.ConclusionSTDM prevalence was high and similar in men and women. Markers of renal impairment and longer diabetes duration were associated with STDM in this Indigenous primary care population. Embedded teleretinal screening, known diabetes duration-based risk stratification and targeted interventions may lower the prevalence of STDM in remote Indigenous primary care services.Trial registration numberAustralia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register: ACTRN 12616000370404.

1999 ◽  
Vol 92 (7) ◽  
pp. 667-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
NATHAN A. RIDGEWAY ◽  
DONALD R. HARVILL ◽  
LEO M. HARVILL ◽  
THELMA M. FALIN ◽  
GAYLE M. FORESTER ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. e277-e277 ◽  
Author(s):  
M U Shalowitz ◽  
J S Eng ◽  
C O McKinney ◽  
J Krohn ◽  
B Lapin ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasliza Abu Hassan ◽  
Hizlinda Tohid ◽  
Rahmah Mohd Amin ◽  
Mohamed Badrulnizam Long Bidin ◽  
Leelavathi Muthupalaniappen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 104267
Author(s):  
Morgan Hampton Randall ◽  
Zachary Merle Haulsee ◽  
Jingwen Zhang ◽  
Justin Marsden ◽  
William Patrick Moran ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e029965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanie Sims Gould ◽  
Catherine Tong ◽  
Jessica Ly ◽  
Sara Vazirian ◽  
Adriaan Windt ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing globally and there is critical need develop interventions to improve health outcomes among older people. The Group Appointments in Primary Care (GAP) study was a randomised controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of a group and team-based medical visit programme to lower haemoglobin A1c among patients with T2DM. We aimed to understand the barriers and facilitators to implement the GAP intervention within a primary care setting, with an emphasis on patient experience.Research design and methodsThis was a qualitative exploratory study. Data were gathered from semistructured interviews conducted with the first cohort of GAP study participants (n=15) at baseline and intervention completion. GAP participants were aged >65, diagnosed with T2DM and from one primary care clinic. The interview questions identified the patient perspectives and factors relating to their attendance at seven group medical visits that were part of the intervention programme. Data were analysed using framework analysis.ResultsWe identified four themes that captured participants’ experiences: (1) Education: learning with professionals, learning with one another; (2) Social Support: common interests, common problems; (3) Setting: ease of location, ease of conversation and (4) Impact: expectations met, empowerment gained. The GAP intervention increased participants’ self-reported diabetes literacy and self-management skills.ConclusionsWe learnt that: accessible community centres, not primary care offices, were the ideal location for GAP; the consistent leadership of the primary care physician was valued by participants; and, the content related to exercise and healthy diet were viewed as impactful. Also, learning was achieved through content delivered by clinical experts, and by T2DM experts with lived experience—the GAP peers. Our findings highlight the important role of group learning.Trial registration numberNCT02002143


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document