Intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes reduces cardiovascular disease, but not cardiovascular or all-cause mortality, and increases risk of severe hypoglycaemia

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
D. Chyun
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tu N Nguyen ◽  
Katie Harris ◽  
Mark Woodward ◽  
John Chalmers ◽  
Mark Cooper ◽  
...  

<b>Objective. </b>To develop a frailty index (FI) and explore the relationship of frailty to subsequent adverse outcomes on the effectiveness and safety of more intensive control of both blood glucose and blood pressure (BP), amongst participants with type-2 diabetes in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. <p><b>Research Design and Methods. </b>Cox proportional-hazard models were used to estimate the effectiveness and safety of intensive glucose control and BP intervention according to frailty (defined as FI>0.21) status. The primary outcomes were macrovascular events and microvascular events. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, severe hypoglycaemia, and discontinuation of BP treatment due to hypotension/dizziness.</p> <p><b>Results.</b> There were 11140 participants (mean age 65.8, 42.5% female, 25.7% frail). Frailty was an independent predictor of all primary outcomes and secondary outcomes. The effect of intensive glucose treatment on primary outcomes showed some evidence of attenuation in the frail: HRs for combined major macro- and micro-vascular events 1.03, 95%CI 0.90-1.19 in the frail vs 0.84, 95%CI 0.74-0.94 non-frail (p=0.02). A similar trend was observed with BP intervention. <a>Severe hypoglycaemia rates (per 1000 person-years) were higher in the frail: 8.39 (6.15–10.63) vs. 4.80 (3.84–5.76) in non-frail</a> (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in discontinuation of BP treatment between frailty groups.</p> <p><b>Conclusions. </b>It was possible to retrospectively estimate frailty in a trial population, and this FI identified those at higher risk of poor outcomes. Participants with frailty had some attenuation of benefit from intensive glucose lowering and BP lowering treatments. </p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tu N Nguyen ◽  
Katie Harris ◽  
Mark Woodward ◽  
John Chalmers ◽  
Mark Cooper ◽  
...  

<b>Objective. </b>To develop a frailty index (FI) and explore the relationship of frailty to subsequent adverse outcomes on the effectiveness and safety of more intensive control of both blood glucose and blood pressure (BP), amongst participants with type-2 diabetes in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. <p><b>Research Design and Methods. </b>Cox proportional-hazard models were used to estimate the effectiveness and safety of intensive glucose control and BP intervention according to frailty (defined as FI>0.21) status. The primary outcomes were macrovascular events and microvascular events. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, severe hypoglycaemia, and discontinuation of BP treatment due to hypotension/dizziness.</p> <p><b>Results.</b> There were 11140 participants (mean age 65.8, 42.5% female, 25.7% frail). Frailty was an independent predictor of all primary outcomes and secondary outcomes. The effect of intensive glucose treatment on primary outcomes showed some evidence of attenuation in the frail: HRs for combined major macro- and micro-vascular events 1.03, 95%CI 0.90-1.19 in the frail vs 0.84, 95%CI 0.74-0.94 non-frail (p=0.02). A similar trend was observed with BP intervention. <a>Severe hypoglycaemia rates (per 1000 person-years) were higher in the frail: 8.39 (6.15–10.63) vs. 4.80 (3.84–5.76) in non-frail</a> (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in discontinuation of BP treatment between frailty groups.</p> <p><b>Conclusions. </b>It was possible to retrospectively estimate frailty in a trial population, and this FI identified those at higher risk of poor outcomes. Participants with frailty had some attenuation of benefit from intensive glucose lowering and BP lowering treatments. </p>


Diabetologia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (10) ◽  
pp. 1883-1891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilie H. Zobel ◽  
Bernt Johan von Scholten ◽  
Henrik Reinhard ◽  
Frederik Persson ◽  
Tine W. Hansen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Gedebjerg ◽  
Mette Bjerre ◽  
Alisa Devedzic Kjaergaard ◽  
Rudi Steffensen ◽  
Jens Steen Nielsen ◽  
...  

<b>Objective</b>: Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is linked to risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetes, but the nature of the association is unclear. We investigated the association between MBL and risk of cardiovascular events (CVE) and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes. <p><b>Research Design and Methods</b>: In a cohort study of 7588 patients with type 2 diabetes, we measured serum MBL in 7305 and performed MBL expression genotyping in 3043. We grouped serum MBL and MBL expression genotypes into three categories: low, intermediate, and high. Outcomes were CVE (myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, unstable angina, and cardiovascular death) and all-cause mortality. The association with outcomes was examined by spline and Cox regression analyses. </p> <p><b>Results</b>: Serum MBL and CVE showed a U-shaped association. Compared to the intermediate serum MBL category, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for CVE was 1.82 (95% CI, 1.34 to 2.46) for the low-MBL category and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.14 to 1.92) for the high-MBL category. We found a similar U-shaped association for all-cause mortality, but with lower risk estimates. Compared to the intermediate MBL expression genotype, the adjusted HR for CVE was 1.40 (95% CI, 0.87 to 2.25) for the low-expression genotype and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.01 to 2.06) for the high-expression genotype. MBL expression genotype was not associated with all-cause mortality. </p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Both serum MBL and MBL expression genotype showed a U-shaped association with CVE risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Our findings suggest that serum MBL is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in this population.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Gedebjerg ◽  
Mette Bjerre ◽  
Alisa Devedzic Kjaergaard ◽  
Rudi Steffensen ◽  
Jens Steen Nielsen ◽  
...  

<b>Objective</b>: Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is linked to risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetes, but the nature of the association is unclear. We investigated the association between MBL and risk of cardiovascular events (CVE) and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes. <p><b>Research Design and Methods</b>: In a cohort study of 7588 patients with type 2 diabetes, we measured serum MBL in 7305 and performed MBL expression genotyping in 3043. We grouped serum MBL and MBL expression genotypes into three categories: low, intermediate, and high. Outcomes were CVE (myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, unstable angina, and cardiovascular death) and all-cause mortality. The association with outcomes was examined by spline and Cox regression analyses. </p> <p><b>Results</b>: Serum MBL and CVE showed a U-shaped association. Compared to the intermediate serum MBL category, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for CVE was 1.82 (95% CI, 1.34 to 2.46) for the low-MBL category and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.14 to 1.92) for the high-MBL category. We found a similar U-shaped association for all-cause mortality, but with lower risk estimates. Compared to the intermediate MBL expression genotype, the adjusted HR for CVE was 1.40 (95% CI, 0.87 to 2.25) for the low-expression genotype and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.01 to 2.06) for the high-expression genotype. MBL expression genotype was not associated with all-cause mortality. </p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Both serum MBL and MBL expression genotype showed a U-shaped association with CVE risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Our findings suggest that serum MBL is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in this population.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document