scholarly journals Asia-Pacific working group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update 2018

Gut ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (10) ◽  
pp. 1757-1768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph JY Sung ◽  
Philip WY Chiu ◽  
Francis K L Chan ◽  
James YW Lau ◽  
Khean-lee Goh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Endoscopic Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding remains an important emergency condition, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. As endoscopic therapy is the ’gold standard' of management, treatment of these patients can be considered in three stages: pre-endoscopic treatment, endoscopic haemostasis and post-endoscopic management. Since publication of the Asia-Pacific consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) 7 years ago, there have been significant advancements in the clinical management of patients in all three stages. These include pre-endoscopy risk stratification scores, blood and platelet transfusion, use of proton pump inhibitors; during endoscopy new haemostasis techniques (haemostatic powder spray and over-the-scope clips); and post-endoscopy management by second-look endoscopy and medication strategies. Emerging techniques, including capsule endoscopy and Doppler endoscopic probe in assessing adequacy of endoscopic therapy, and the pre-emptive use of angiographic embolisation, are attracting new attention. An emerging problem is the increasing use of dual antiplatelet agents and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with cardiac and cerebrovascular diseases. Guidelines on the discontinuation and then resumption of these agents in patients presenting with NVUGIB are very much needed. The Asia-Pacific Working Group examined recent evidence and recommends practical management guidelines in this updated consensus statement.

scholarly journals Prognostic factors associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding based on the French multicenter SANGHRIA trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (10) ◽  
pp. E1504-E1511
Author(s):  
Vincent Quentin ◽  
André-Jean Remy ◽  
Gilles Macaigne ◽  
Rachida Leblanc-Boubchir ◽  
Jean-Pierre Arpurt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Peptic Ulcers ◽  
Charlson Score ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Rockall Score ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Abstract Background and study aims Prognostic and risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) might have changed overtime because of the increased use of direct oral anticoagulants and improved gastroenterological care. This study was undertaken to assess the outcomes of UGIB in light of these new determinants by establishing a new national, multicenter cohort 10 years after the first. Methods Consecutive outpatients and inpatients with UGIB symptoms consulting at 46 French general hospitals were prospectively included between November 2017 and October 2018. They were followed for at least for 6 weeks to assess 6-week rebleeding and mortality rates and factors associated with each event. Results Among the 2498 enrolled patients (mean age 68.5 [16.3] years, 67.1 % men), 74.5 % were outpatients and 21 % had cirrhosis. Median Charlson score was 2 (IQR 1–4) and Rockall score was 5 (IQR 3–6). Within 24 hours, 83.4 % of the patients underwent endoscopy. The main causes of bleeding were peptic ulcers (44.9 %) and portal hypertension (18.9 %). The early in-hospital rebleeding rate was 10.5 %. The 6-week mortality rate was 12.5 %. Predictors significantly associated with 6-week mortality were initial transfusion (OR 1.54; 95 %CI 1.04–2.28), Charlson score > 4 (OR 1.80; 95 %CI 1.31–2.48), Rockall score > 5 (OR 1.98; 95 %CI 1.39–2.80), being an inpatient (OR 2.45; 95 %CI 1.76–3.41) and rebleeding (OR 2.6; 95 %CI 1.85–3.64). Anticoagulant therapy was not associated with dreaded outcomes. Conclusions The 6-week mortality rate remained high after UGIB, especially for inpatients. Predictors of mortality underlined the weight of comorbidities on outcomes.

scholarly journals Asia-Pacific Working Group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Gut ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 1170-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Y. Sung ◽  
F. K. L. Chan ◽  
M. Chen ◽  
J. Y. L. Ching ◽  
K. Y. Ho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Group Consensus ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Towards personalised management for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Gut ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2020-323846
Author(s):  
Joseph J Y Sung ◽  
Loren Laine ◽  
Ernst J Kuipers ◽  
Alan N Barkun
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Professional Societies ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
Endoscopic Assessment ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Guidelines from national and international professional societies on upper gastrointestinal bleeding highlight the important clinical issues but do not always identify specific management strategies pertaining to individual patients. Optimal treatment should consider the personal needs of an individual patient and the pertinent resources and experience available at the point of care. This article integrates international guidelines and consensus into three stages of management: pre-endoscopic assessment and treatment, endoscopic evaluation and haemostasis and postendoscopic management. We emphasise the need for personalised management strategies based on patient characteristics, nature of bleeding lesions and the clinical setting including available resources.

scholarly journals Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

BMJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. l536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian J Stanley ◽  
Loren Laine
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Proton Pump Inhibitors ◽  
Proton Pump ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Endoscopic Therapy ◽  
Ulcer Bleeding ◽  
Vasoactive Drugs ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Abstract Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common medical emergency, with a reported mortality of 2-10%. Patients identified as being at very low risk of either needing an intervention or death can be managed as outpatients. For all other patients, intravenous fluids as needed for resuscitation and red cell transfusion at a hemoglobin threshold of 70-80 g/L are recommended. After resuscitation is initiated, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the prokinetic agent erythromycin may be administered, with antibiotics and vasoactive drugs recommended in patients who have cirrhosis. Endoscopy should be undertaken within 24 hours, with earlier endoscopy considered after resuscitation in patients at high risk, such as those with hemodynamic instability. Endoscopic treatment is used for variceal bleeding (for example, ligation for esophageal varices and tissue glue for gastric varices) and for high risk non-variceal bleeding (for example, injection, thermal probes, or clips for lesions with active bleeding or non-bleeding visible vessel). Patients who require endoscopic therapy for ulcer bleeding should receive high dose proton pump inhibitors after endoscopy, whereas those who have variceal bleeding should continue taking antibiotics and vasoactive drugs. Recurrent ulcer bleeding is treated with repeat endoscopic therapy, with subsequent bleeding managed by interventional radiology or surgery. Recurrent variceal bleeding is generally treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. In patients who require antithrombotic agents, outcomes appear to be better when these drugs are reintroduced early.

scholarly journals Novel hemostatic adhesive powder for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (12) ◽  
pp. E1763-E1767
Author(s):  
Jin-Seok Park ◽  
Hyung Kil Kim ◽  
Yong Woon Shin ◽  
Kye Sook Kwon ◽  
Don Haeng Lee
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Endoscopic Therapy ◽  
Bleeding Site ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Main Study ◽  
Rebleeding Rate ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Abstract Background and study aims A new hemostatic adhesive powder (UI-EWD) was developed to reduce high rebleeding rates and technical challenges associated with application of currently available hemostatic powders. The aim of the current study was to assess performance of UI-EWD for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). Patients and methods A total of 56 consecutive patients that received UI-EWD monotherapy for endoscopic hemostasis due to NVUGIB were retrospectively reviewed. Main study outcomes were success rates with immediate hemostasis and rebleeding within 30 days. Outcomes were analyzed by reviewing patient medical records. Results Etiologies of bleeding were: post-endoscopic therapy bleeding in 46 (82.1 %), peptic ulcer in 8 (14.3 %), tumor in 1 (1.8 %), and other in 1 (1.8 %). UI-EWD was successfully applied at bleeding site in all cases. The success rate of immediate hemostasis was 96.4 % (54/56), and the 30-day rebleeding rate among patients that achieved immediate hemostasis was 3.7 % (2/54). No adverse event related to use of UI-EWD occurred. Conclusion UI-EWD was found to have a high immediate hemostasis success rate in NVUGIB when used as monotherapy and showed promising results in terms of preventing rebleeding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document