scholarly journals Left ventricular mechanical dispersion predicts arrhythmic risk in mitral valve prolapse

Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (14) ◽  
pp. 1063-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Ermakov ◽  
Radhika Gulhar ◽  
Lisa Lim ◽  
Dwight Bibby ◽  
Qizhi Fang ◽  
...  

ObjectiveBileaflet mitral valve prolapse (MVP) with either focal or diffuse myocardial fibrosis has been linked to ventricular arrhythmia and/or sudden cardiac arrest. Left ventricular (LV) mechanical dispersion by speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) is a measure of heterogeneity of ventricular contraction previously associated with myocardial fibrosis. The aim of this study is to determine whether mechanical dispersion can identify MVP at higher arrhythmic risk.MethodsWe identified 32 consecutive arrhythmic MVPs (A-MVP) with a history of complex ventricular ectopy on Holter/event monitor (n=23) or defibrillator placement (n=9) along with 27 MVPs without arrhythmic complications (NA-MVP) and 39 controls. STE was performed to calculate global longitudinal strain (GLS) as the average peak longitudinal strain from an 18-segment LV model and mechanical dispersion as the SD of the time to peak strain of each segment.ResultsMVPs had significantly higher mechanical dispersion compared with controls (52 vs 42 ms, p=0.005) despite similar LV ejection fraction (62% vs 63%, p=0.42) and GLS (−19.7 vs −21, p=0.045). A-MVP and NA-MVP had similar demographics, LV ejection fraction and GLS (all p>0.05). A-MVP had more bileaflet prolapse (69% vs 44%, p=0.031) with a similar degree of mitral regurgitation (mostly trace or mild in both groups) (p>0.05). A-MVP exhibited greater mechanical dispersion when compared with NA-MVP (59 vs 43 ms, p=0.0002). Mechanical dispersion was the only significant predictor of arrhythmic risk on multivariate analysis (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.11, p=0.006).ConclusionsSTE-derived mechanical dispersion may help identify MVP patients at higher arrhythmic risk.

Author(s):  
Akshar Jaglan ◽  
Sarah Roemer ◽  
Ana Cristina Perez Moreno ◽  
Bijoy K Khandheria

Abstract Aims Myocardial work (MW) is a novel parameter that can be used in a clinical setting to assess left ventricular (LV) pressures and deformation. We sought to distinguish patterns of global MW index in hypertensive vs. non-hypertensive patients and to look at differences between categories of hypertension. Methods and results Sixty-five hypertensive patients (mean age 65 ± 13 years; 30 male) and 15 controls (mean age 38 ± 12 years; 7 male) underwent transthoracic echocardiography at rest. Hypertensive patients were subdivided into Stage 1 (n = 32) and Stage 2 (n = 33) hypertension based on 2017 American College of Cardiology guidelines. Exclusion criteria were suboptimal image quality for myocardial deformation analysis, reduced ejection fraction, valvular heart disease, intracardiac shunt, and arrhythmia. Global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency were estimated from LV pressure–strain loops utilizing proprietary software from speckle-tracking echocardiography. LV systolic and diastolic pressures were estimated using non-invasive brachial artery cuff pressure. Global longitudinal strain and LV ejection fraction were preserved between the groups with no statistically significant difference, whereas there was a statically significant difference between the control and two hypertension groups in GWI (P = 0.01), GCW (P < 0.001), and GWW (P < 0.001). Conclusion Non-invasive MW analysis allows better understanding of LV response under conditions of increased afterload. MW is an advanced assessment of LV systolic function in hypertension patients, giving a closer look at the relationship between LV pressure and contractility in settings of increased load dependency than LV ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Diana ◽  
Laura Manfredonia ◽  
Monica Filice ◽  
Emanuele Ravenna ◽  
Francesca Graziani ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a hallmark of cardiac damage in mitral regurgitation (MR). GLS > −18% in patients with severe organic MR (OMR) and normal LV ejection fraction (LVEF) is an independent predictor of postoperative LV dysfunction. While it is known that GLS is impaired in less than severe functional ischaemic MR (FMR), the value of GLS in less than severe OMR is not known. We aimed to determine prevalence and determinants of any GLS impairment in OMR, in comparison to FMR. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 51 consecutive patients (33 OMR and 18 FMR) with mild-to-moderate, moderate and moderate-to-severe MR (Table*). Overall, GLS was higher in OMR than FMR (17.9±4.5 vs. 10.3±5.3, P<0.001), with rate of impairment of 45% in OMR and 89% in FMR (P= 0.0024). Results However, no significant difference was found in GLS between mild-to-moderate, moderate and moderate-to-severe MR patients within OMR (17.7±4.7 vs. 16.9±3.9 vs. 22.4±3, respectively, P>0.05), as well as FMR (9.8±6.6 vs. 10.7±5.3 vs. 10.4±5.3, respectively, P>0.05) groups. GLS correlated directly with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) in both OMR (r=0.69, P<0.001) and FMR (r=0.90, P<0.001), and inversely with LV mass indexed for body surface area (LVMi) in both OMR (r = −0.50, P=0.005) and FMR (r = −0.48, P=0.042). While correlation with LVEF was better for FMR than OMR (Z − 1.95, P=0.026), correlation with LVMi was similar for OMR and FMR groups (Z − 0.082, P>0.05). Conclusions In patients with OMR, GLS may be reduced, despite normal LVEF, in less than severe MR. Prevalence and degree of GLS impairment in OMR is less than in FMR. In OMR, as well as in FMR, GLS impairment is independent of entity of MR, but rather correlates with LVMi, maybe reflecting impact of myocardial fibrosis derived by increased LVMi on GLS.


Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2020-317451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aniek L van Wijngaarden ◽  
Marta de Riva ◽  
Yasmine Lisanne Hiemstra ◽  
Pieter van der Bijl ◽  
Federico Fortuni ◽  
...  

ObjectiveMitral valve prolapse (MVP) has been associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA), but little is known about VA in patients with significant primary mitral regurgitation (MR). Our aim was to describe the prevalence of symptomatic VA in patients with MVP (fibro-elastic deficiency or Barlow’s disease) referred for mitral valve (MV) surgery because of moderate-to-severe MR, and to identify clinical, electrocardiographic, standard and advanced echocardiographic parameters associated with VA.Methods610 consecutive patients (64±12 years, 36% female) were included. Symptomatic VA was defined as symptomatic and frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVC, Lown grade ≥2), non-sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) without ischaemic aetiology.ResultsA total of 67 (11%) patients showed symptomatic VA, of which 3 (4%) had VF, 3 (4%) sustained VT, 27 (40%) non-sustained VT and 34 (51%) frequent PVCs. Patients with VA were significantly younger, more often female and showed T-wave inversions; furthermore, they showed significant MV morphofunctional abnormalities, such as mitral annular disjunction (39% vs 20%, p<0.001), and dilatation (annular diameter 37±5 mm vs 33±6 mm, p<0.001), lower global longitudinal strain (GLS 20.9±3.1% vs 22.0±3.6%, p=0.032) and prolonged mechanical dispersion (45±12 ms vs 38±14 ms, p=0.003) as compared with patients without VA. Female sex, increased MV annular diameter, lower GLS and prolonged mechanical dispersion were identified as independent associates of symptomatic VA.ConclusionIn patients with MVP with moderate-to-severe MR, symptomatic VA are relatively frequent and associated with significant MV annular abnormalities, subtle left ventricular function impairment and heterogeneous contraction. Assessment of these parameters might help decision-making over further diagnostic analyses and improve risk-stratification.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Alves ◽  
A V Marinho ◽  
J A Ferreira ◽  
J Milner ◽  
A Freitas ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Left atrial (LA) mechanics is impaired in mitral valve disease, but it is not clear whether reservoir, conduit or contractile functions are differentially impaired in stenosis (MS) or regurgitation (MR). We aimed to study LA mechanics in patients with moderate MR or moderate MS and identify discriminators of disease. METHODS We conducted a prospective, observational study of 100 patients with isolated moderate MR and 100 patients with moderate MS. LA mechanics with speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) assessed LA reservoir (LA ɛsys and SRs), conduit(LAɛe, SRe), and contractile (LAɛa, SRa) functions. Left ventricle (LV) functional parameters were assessed as well, including LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic diameter (LVDD) and LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS). RESULTS The mean age was 67 ± 14 years and 75% were female. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic diameter (LVDD), LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) did not differ between MR and MS (table 1).LA indexed volume (LAVi) and LA strain did not vary between MR and MS, but strain rate did. SRs and SRe had better values in MR, whereas SRa had worse values in MR (table 1). SRe (&lt;-0.7%) had the superior discriminative power for MR, with an area under the curve of 0.85, sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 85%. CONCLUSIONS LA strain rate phases were the only parameters that varied between MR and MS. Contractile phase strain rate was more impaired in MR and conduit phase strain rate in MS. This highly specific data reflect the earlier hemodynamic changes occurring in LA in the setting of mitral valve disease. mMR mMS P value LVEF (±SD,%) 57.4 ± 6.4 59.6 ± 4.6 0.145 LV-GLS (±SD, %) -17.7 ± 4.5 -17.1 ± 3.5 0.587 sPAP (±SD, mmHg) 30.3 ± 10.5 32.4 ± 8.3 0.387 LAVi (± SD, ml/m2) 46.3 ± 6.4 48.2 ± 7.4 0.281 LAɛs (± SD, %) 15.8 ± 7.3 13.3 ± 9 0.062 LAɛe (± SD, %) 8.4 ± 4.7 7.1 ± 5.4 0.074 LAɛa (± SD, %) 6.3 ± 4.8 7.4 ± 4.5 0.081 LA SRs (± SD, %) 0.8 ± 0.4 0.6 ± 0.3 0.004 LA SRe (± SD, %) -0.9 ± 0.5 -0.5 ± 0.3 &lt;0.001 LA SRa (± SD, %) -0.5 ± 0.4 -0.8 ± 0.5 0.007


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Venner ◽  
M Boddaert ◽  
C Selton-Suty ◽  
L Filippetti ◽  
J M Sellal ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is an anatomical variation of the mitral annulus, characterized by an atrial displacement of the leaflet’s hinge points. It is associated with severe ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Purpose The aim of this study was to assess MAD in MVP by echocardiography, analyze the reproducibility of measurements and evaluate its importance for arrhythmic risk stratification along with strain analysis of myocardial deformation. Methods Two hundred and sixty patients with MVP were included. MAD was evaluated and measured by two observers in the parasternal long axis and in the apical views. Myocardial longitudinal strain was analyzed by speckle-tracking. Results Ninety four patients (36.2%) of MVP patients presented MAD. These patients were younger (53.7 ± 15.1 vs 58.4 ± 17.6, p = 0.033) with higher rate of atypical chest pain (21.3% vs 11.5%, p = 0,041) and bileaflet prolapse (50.5% vs 32.3%, p = 0.004). Para-sternal long-axis view was the incidence of choice to detect MAD with a moderate inter-observer concordance (Kappa of 0.55), good correlation (r = 0.69, p &lt; 0.01) and inter-class correlation coefficient (0.82; 0.67 – 0.90). Twenty patients (7.7%) had a history of severe VA. Among them, no difference was noted in terms of presence (35% vs 36.3%, p = 0.911) or length of MAD (11.1 ± 2.5 vs 11.2 ± 3.1, p = 0.937). However, deformation analysis showed reduced global longitudinal strain (18.6 ± 3.1 vs 21.3 ± 3.3%, p = 0.001) and higher mechanical dispersion values (46 ± 13 vs 37.4 ± 12.9 ms, p = 0.002)in comparison to the rest of the MVP population. Conclusion No significant association was found between severe VA and the presence or severity of MAD in MVP patients. Increased mechanical dispersion and reduced global longitudinal strain may be helpful for arrhythmic risk stratification. Abstract P668 Figure. Comparison of MD and GLS


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlène Dupuis ◽  
Marie-Annick Clavel ◽  
Haïfa Mahjoub ◽  
Kim O’Connor ◽  
Mario Sénéchal ◽  
...  

Introduction: The optimal timing of mitral valve (MV) surgery in patients with organic mitral regurgitation (OMR) is controversial. The objective of this study was to determine independent predictors of cardiac events in patients with OMR and no triggers for mitral valve surgery. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that forward LV ejection fraction (LVEF) calculated by the Dumesnil’s method (i.e. stroke volume measured in LV outflow tract divided by left ventricular end diastolic volume) is superior to the LVEF measured by the biplane Simpson’s method. Methods: Two hundred seventy eight patients with OMR (i.e. severity grade ≥1/4) and Doppler echocardiography exam at least 6 months before MV surgery or death were included. Clinical and echocardiographic data of 278 patients with OMR were analyzed retrospectively. The study end-point was the composite of death or need for mitral valve surgery. Results: During a mean follow-up of 5.4 ± 3.2 years, there were 147 (53%) events: 96 (35%) mitral surgeries and 66 (24%) deaths. There was no difference in the Simpson LVEF (65 ± 6% vs 65 ± 4%; p=0.86) and global longitudinal strain (-21.18 ± 3.26 % vs -21.26 ± 2.44 %; p=0.86) between patients who had an event versus those who were event-free during follow-up. However, LVEF calculated by Dumesnil’s method at baseline was lower in the event-group (47 ± 15%vs 59 ± 15%; p<0.0001) compared to the non-event group. After adjustment for age, sex, Charlson’s probability, coronary artery disease, ACE inhibitors, β-blockers, diuretics, AF and MR grade, forward LVEF by Dumesnil’s method remained an independent predictor of the occurrence of cardiac events (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.09, 95% interval confidence: 1.02-1.17; p=0.01). Conclusion: This study shows that the forward LVEF calculated by the Dumesnil’s method is superior to the standard LVEF or to longitudinal strain to predict outcomes in OMR. These results could help to improve risk stratification of patients with OMR and thereby individualized the treatment’s strategy. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Montenbruck ◽  
S Kelle ◽  
S Esch ◽  
A.K Schwarz ◽  
S Giusca ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ejection fraction is the standard metric to analyze cardiac function in the left (LV) or right (RV) ventricles. However, these global metrics are not able to characterize patients in which the heart compensates for regional dysfunction. More sensitive metrics are needed to detect subclinical regional dysfunction before cardiac remodeling results in changes in ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). Fast-SENC intramyocardial strain (fSENC) is a unique cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) modality that measures intramyocardial contraction in 1 heartbeat per image plane. This prospective registry compares segmental fSENC to standard CMR calculations (e.g. LVEF, volumes, mass, etc.) in patients with mitral valve disease. Methods A single center, prospective registry of CMR scans acquired with a 1.5T scanner were evaluated for standard CMR calculations as well as fSENC scans. Intramyocardial LV & RV strain was quantified with MyoStrain software. Three short axis scans (basal, midventricular, & apical) were used to calculate peak strain in 16 LV & 6 RV longitudinal segments while three long axis scans (2-, 3-, & 4-chamber) were used to calculate 21 LV & 5 RV circumferential segments. Results A total of 493 scans in 424 patients with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation were included in the study. Patients had an average (± stdev) age of 60 (15) yrs and BMI of 27 (4) kg/m2; 63% had arterial hypertension, 19% diabetes mellitus, 10% atrial fibrillation, 15% pulmonary disease, and 32% coronary artery disease. Figure 1 shows the non-linear relationship between segmental fSENC strain (% of normal LV segments ≤−17%) versus LVEF (R=0.81). Conclusion Segmental fSENC detects subclinical LV dysfunction before changes in LVEF. Evaluating segmental longitudinal and circumferential fSENC peak strain provides an alternative metric that shows consistent changes in cardiac function in patients with mitral valve disease irrespective of global calculations that are dependent on loading conditions. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Author(s):  
Marcio Silva Miguel Lima ◽  
Hector R Villarraga ◽  
Maria Cristina Donadio Abduch ◽  
Marta Fernandes Lima ◽  
Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana Cruz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document