fraction measurement
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

333
(FIVE YEARS 68)

H-INDEX

25
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2022 ◽  
Vol 2022 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
M. Ablikim ◽  
M. N. Achasov ◽  
P. Adlarson ◽  
S. Ahmed ◽  
...  

Abstract Using a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 6.32 fb−1 recorded by the BESIII detector at center-of-mass energies between 4.178 and 4.226 GeV, an amplitude analysis of the decay $$ {D}_s^{+} $$ D s + → π+π0π0 is performed, and the relative fractions and phases of different intermediate processes are determined. The absolute branching fraction of the decay $$ {D}_s^{+} $$ D s + → π+π0π0 is measured to be (0.50 ± 0.04stat ± 0.02syst)%. The absolute branching fraction of the intermediate process $$ {D}_s^{+} $$ D s + → f0(980)π+, f0(980) → π0π0 is determined to be (0.28 ± 0.04stat ± 0.04syst)%.


2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 1480-1489
Author(s):  
Adam Creuziger ◽  
Thien Phan ◽  
Darren Pagan

The use of high-energy synchrotron X-ray diffraction sources has become increasingly common for high-quality phase fraction measurements and microstructural evolution experiments. While the high flux, large volume illuminated and large number of diffraction vectors should reduce common sources of uncertainty and bias, the distribution of the diffraction vectors may still cause bias in the phase fraction measurement. This hypothesis of bias was investigated with example experimental data and synthetic data. The authors found that there may be bias depending on the sample texture, the distribution of diffraction vectors and the hkl planes used in the phase fraction measurement, even for nearly complete coverage of a pole figure. The authors developed a series of geometry-based correction values that reduced the measurement bias due to sampling scheme and texture in the phase fraction measurement by an order of magnitude. The efficacy of these corrections was demonstrated with application to both experimental and synthetic data.


2021 ◽  
Vol 92 (10) ◽  
pp. 105006
Author(s):  
Junchao Huang ◽  
Ziwei Guo ◽  
Xiao-Yu Tang ◽  
Haifeng Ji ◽  
Baoliang Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ablikim ◽  
M. N. Achasov ◽  
P. Adlarson ◽  
S. Ahmed ◽  
M. Albrecht ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ablikim ◽  
M. N. Achasov ◽  
P. Adlarson ◽  
S. Ahmed ◽  
M. Albrecht ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document