CMR fast-SENC segmental intramyocardial LV strain monitors decline in heart function before ejection fraction in patient with mitral valve disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Montenbruck ◽  
S Kelle ◽  
S Esch ◽  
A.K Schwarz ◽  
S Giusca ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ejection fraction is the standard metric to analyze cardiac function in the left (LV) or right (RV) ventricles. However, these global metrics are not able to characterize patients in which the heart compensates for regional dysfunction. More sensitive metrics are needed to detect subclinical regional dysfunction before cardiac remodeling results in changes in ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). Fast-SENC intramyocardial strain (fSENC) is a unique cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) modality that measures intramyocardial contraction in 1 heartbeat per image plane. This prospective registry compares segmental fSENC to standard CMR calculations (e.g. LVEF, volumes, mass, etc.) in patients with mitral valve disease. Methods A single center, prospective registry of CMR scans acquired with a 1.5T scanner were evaluated for standard CMR calculations as well as fSENC scans. Intramyocardial LV & RV strain was quantified with MyoStrain software. Three short axis scans (basal, midventricular, & apical) were used to calculate peak strain in 16 LV & 6 RV longitudinal segments while three long axis scans (2-, 3-, & 4-chamber) were used to calculate 21 LV & 5 RV circumferential segments. Results A total of 493 scans in 424 patients with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation were included in the study. Patients had an average (± stdev) age of 60 (15) yrs and BMI of 27 (4) kg/m2; 63% had arterial hypertension, 19% diabetes mellitus, 10% atrial fibrillation, 15% pulmonary disease, and 32% coronary artery disease. Figure 1 shows the non-linear relationship between segmental fSENC strain (% of normal LV segments ≤−17%) versus LVEF (R=0.81). Conclusion Segmental fSENC detects subclinical LV dysfunction before changes in LVEF. Evaluating segmental longitudinal and circumferential fSENC peak strain provides an alternative metric that shows consistent changes in cardiac function in patients with mitral valve disease irrespective of global calculations that are dependent on loading conditions. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Alves ◽  
A V Marinho ◽  
J A Ferreira ◽  
J Milner ◽  
A Freitas ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Left atrial (LA) mechanics is impaired in mitral valve disease, but it is not clear whether reservoir, conduit or contractile functions are differentially impaired in stenosis (MS) or regurgitation (MR). We aimed to study LA mechanics in patients with moderate MR or moderate MS and identify discriminators of disease. METHODS We conducted a prospective, observational study of 100 patients with isolated moderate MR and 100 patients with moderate MS. LA mechanics with speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) assessed LA reservoir (LA ɛsys and SRs), conduit(LAɛe, SRe), and contractile (LAɛa, SRa) functions. Left ventricle (LV) functional parameters were assessed as well, including LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic diameter (LVDD) and LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS). RESULTS The mean age was 67 ± 14 years and 75% were female. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic diameter (LVDD), LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) did not differ between MR and MS (table 1).LA indexed volume (LAVi) and LA strain did not vary between MR and MS, but strain rate did. SRs and SRe had better values in MR, whereas SRa had worse values in MR (table 1). SRe (<-0.7%) had the superior discriminative power for MR, with an area under the curve of 0.85, sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 85%. CONCLUSIONS LA strain rate phases were the only parameters that varied between MR and MS. Contractile phase strain rate was more impaired in MR and conduit phase strain rate in MS. This highly specific data reflect the earlier hemodynamic changes occurring in LA in the setting of mitral valve disease. mMR mMS P value LVEF (±SD,%) 57.4 ± 6.4 59.6 ± 4.6 0.145 LV-GLS (±SD, %) -17.7 ± 4.5 -17.1 ± 3.5 0.587 sPAP (±SD, mmHg) 30.3 ± 10.5 32.4 ± 8.3 0.387 LAVi (± SD, ml/m2) 46.3 ± 6.4 48.2 ± 7.4 0.281 LAɛs (± SD, %) 15.8 ± 7.3 13.3 ± 9 0.062 LAɛe (± SD, %) 8.4 ± 4.7 7.1 ± 5.4 0.074 LAɛa (± SD, %) 6.3 ± 4.8 7.4 ± 4.5 0.081 LA SRs (± SD, %) 0.8 ± 0.4 0.6 ± 0.3 0.004 LA SRe (± SD, %) -0.9 ± 0.5 -0.5 ± 0.3 <0.001 LA SRa (± SD, %) -0.5 ± 0.4 -0.8 ± 0.5 0.007


Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (14) ◽  
pp. 1063-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Ermakov ◽  
Radhika Gulhar ◽  
Lisa Lim ◽  
Dwight Bibby ◽  
Qizhi Fang ◽  
...  

ObjectiveBileaflet mitral valve prolapse (MVP) with either focal or diffuse myocardial fibrosis has been linked to ventricular arrhythmia and/or sudden cardiac arrest. Left ventricular (LV) mechanical dispersion by speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) is a measure of heterogeneity of ventricular contraction previously associated with myocardial fibrosis. The aim of this study is to determine whether mechanical dispersion can identify MVP at higher arrhythmic risk.MethodsWe identified 32 consecutive arrhythmic MVPs (A-MVP) with a history of complex ventricular ectopy on Holter/event monitor (n=23) or defibrillator placement (n=9) along with 27 MVPs without arrhythmic complications (NA-MVP) and 39 controls. STE was performed to calculate global longitudinal strain (GLS) as the average peak longitudinal strain from an 18-segment LV model and mechanical dispersion as the SD of the time to peak strain of each segment.ResultsMVPs had significantly higher mechanical dispersion compared with controls (52 vs 42 ms, p=0.005) despite similar LV ejection fraction (62% vs 63%, p=0.42) and GLS (−19.7 vs −21, p=0.045). A-MVP and NA-MVP had similar demographics, LV ejection fraction and GLS (all p>0.05). A-MVP had more bileaflet prolapse (69% vs 44%, p=0.031) with a similar degree of mitral regurgitation (mostly trace or mild in both groups) (p>0.05). A-MVP exhibited greater mechanical dispersion when compared with NA-MVP (59 vs 43 ms, p=0.0002). Mechanical dispersion was the only significant predictor of arrhythmic risk on multivariate analysis (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.11, p=0.006).ConclusionsSTE-derived mechanical dispersion may help identify MVP patients at higher arrhythmic risk.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karlo Romano B. Gicana ◽  
Tuchakorn Lertwanakarn ◽  
Kittipong Tachampa

Background and Objective: Myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) progression entails changes in the structural and functional properties of the heart affecting cardiac timings and intervals within the cardiac cycle. Conventionally, echocardiography is used to determine the cardiac time intervals (CTIs) including systolic and myocardial performance indices (SPI and MPI) in evaluating cardiac function. Alternatively, these CTIs can also be measured using simultaneous recordings of electrocardiography (ECG) and phonocardiography (PCG), but their values in different MMVD stages remain to be established. This study aimed to establish and prove the use of derived SPI and MPI from a dedicated device as a novel approach to assess cardiac function in different stages of MMVD dogs.Materials and Methods: A prospective study in 52 dogs with different MMVD stages measured the CTIs using a novel device. These were compared and correlated with standard echocardiographic parameters. The predictive value of SPI and three new proposed formulas to estimate MPI (i.e., F1, F2, and F3) in association with asymptomatic from symptomatic MMVD dogs were investigated.Results: Our findings revealed that CTI parameters measured from a novel device including QS1, QS2, S1S2, MPI-F1, and MPI-F2 were altered at different stages of MMVD. The SPI and all proposed MPI formulas were comparable with the systolic time interval and Tei index from echocardiography. In addition, the SPI, MPI-F1, and MPI-F2 were significantly correlated with the Tei index. However, the SPI was not able to differentiate the various stages of MMVD. Conversely, only the MPI-F1 (i.e., (QS1 + S2)/S1S2) demonstrated good predictive accuracy when compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic MMVD dogs similar to the Tei index. Moreover, this formula was able to differentiate stages B1 and C with remarkable predictive accuracy, higher sensitivity, and high specificity when compared with the Tei index.Conclusion: We have successfully described the CTI parameters in different MMVD stages using simultaneous ECG and PCG recordings in dogs. Furthermore, we have proven that the concept of using the newly proposed parameters from a novel device is equivalent to the Tei index. Thus, we established a novel approach to evaluate cardiac function and its supportive use in the diagnosis of MMVD patients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 383-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Mantovani ◽  
R. A. L. Muzzi ◽  
G. G. Pereira ◽  
R. J. Yamato ◽  
A. C. Silva ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Montenbruck ◽  
S Kelle ◽  
S Esch ◽  
F Andre ◽  
G Korosoglou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Global longitudinal strain (GLS) has become an alternative to ejection fraction (EF) in identifying reduced cardiac function. However, these global metrics are not able to characterize patients in which symptoms occur even while the heart compensates for regional dysfunction. More sensitive metrics are needed to detect subclinical regional dysfunction and determine the relationship to symptoms that may or may not be associated with cardiac causes. Fast-SENC intramyocardial strain (fSENC) is a unique cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) modality that measures intramyocardial contraction in 1 heartbeat per image plane. This prospective registry compares segmental fSENC to global metrics GLS and LVEF based on NYHA classification. Methods A single center, prospective registry of MRI scans acquired with a 1.5T scanner were evaluated for conventional CMR diagnostics including biventricular EF, volumes and mass. In addition, fSENC scans were acquired and processed with the MyoStrain software to quantify intramyocardial LV & RV strain. Three short axis scans (basal, midventricular, & apical) were used to calculate strain in 16 LV & 6 RV longitudinal segments while three long axis scans (2-, 3- & 4-chamber) were used to calculate 21 LV & 5 RV circumferential segments. All metrics were compared based on NYHA classification. Results A total of 977 scans in 779 patients were included in the study; this population included 210 myocarditis, 46 dilated cardiomyopathy, and 30 ischemic cardiomyopathy cases. Patients had an average (± stdev) age of 55 (17) yrs and BMI of 26 (5) kg/m2; 48% had arterial hypertension, 12% diabetes mellitus, 33% valve disease, 24% cancer, 7% atrial fibrillation, 13% pulmonary disease, 5% left bundle branch block, 35% hypercholesterolemia, and 24% coronary artery disease. Figure 1 shows the relationship between segmental strain, calculated as the percent of normal LV segments (longitudinal & circumferential) based on intramyocardial fSENC <−17%, versus GLS and LVEF. All metrics were compared based on NYHA classification. Figure 1 Conclusion Segmental fSENC identified changes in NYHA classification well before changes in EF or GLS. Measuring segmental fSENC provides an objective view of symptomatic heart failure progression and can serve as surrogate endpoints for trials instead of purely relying on quality of life and subjective symptom perception.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Montenbruck ◽  
S Kelle ◽  
S Esch ◽  
A.K Schwarz ◽  
S Giusca ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is commonly used to assess cardiac function for patients with chronic cardiac diseases. LVEF, like most systemic function assessments, detects dysfunction once enough damage has occurred to prevent common compensatory mechanisms from maintaining cardiac output. More sensitive metrics are being evaluated to more accurately identify subclinical regional dysfunction before cardiac remodeling results in changes in LVEF and global longitudinal strain (GLS). Fast-SENC intramyocardial strain (fSENC) is a unique cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) modality that measures intramyocardial contraction in 1 heartbeat per image plane. This prospective registry compares segmental fSENC to standard CMR calculations (e.g. LVEF, volumes, mass, etc.) for patients with arterial hypertension in the absence of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Methods A single center, prospective registry of CMR scans acquired with a 1.5T scanner were evaluated for standard CMR calculations as well as fSENC scans. Intramyocardial LV & RV strain was quantified with MyoStrain software. Three short axis scans (basal, midventricular, & apical) were used to calculate peak strain in 16 LV & 6 RV longitudinal segments while three long axis scans (2-, 3-, & 4-chamber) were used to calculate 21 LV & 5 RV circumferential segments. Results A total of 773 scans in 650 patients with arterial hypertension but without non-ischemic cardiomyopathies were included in the study. Patients had an average (± stdev) age of 64 (13) yrs and BMI of 28 (5) kg/m2; 24% diabetes mellitus, 10% atrial fibrillation, 15% pulmonary disease, and 39% coronary artery disease. Figure 1 shows a Box & Whisker's plot demonstrating the non-linear relationship between segmental fSENC strain (% of normal LV segments ≤−17%) versus LVEF. The progression of hypertensive heart disease was associated with reduction in septal circumferential contraction despite normal LVEF. Conclusion Segmental fSENC detects subclinical LV dysfunction in patients with early hypertensive heart disease before changes in LVEF. Evaluating segmental longitudinal and circumferential fSENC peak strain provides an alternative metric that shows consistent changes in cardiac function in patients with arterial hypertension. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document