scholarly journals 133 Predictive value of right ventricular impairment on long-term survival after mitral valve surgery – comparison of mini-mitral and conventional surgery

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Abdelrahman ◽  
Maciej Debski ◽  
Syed Qadri ◽  
David Lai Chin kon ◽  
John Victor McGowan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Conventional Surgery ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Permanent pacemaker implantation following mitral valve surgery: a retrospective cohort study of risk factors and long-term outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark R Helmers ◽  
Max Shin ◽  
Amit Iyengar ◽  
Gabriel R Arguelles ◽  
Jarvis Mays ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Tricuspid Valve ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Permanent Pacemaker ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Valvular Surgery

Abstract OBJECTIVES Conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain a complication following valvular surgery. PPMs confer the risk of infection, tricuspid valve regurgitation and pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Literature examining PPM placement in mitral valve surgery (MVS) is limited. METHODS Our institutional mitral valve (MV) database was retrospectively reviewed for adult patients undergoing surgery from 2011 to 2019. Patients with preoperative PPM were excluded. Patients were stratified by the receipt of PPM following their index operations. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine patient and operative risk factors for PPM. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients who underwent isolated MVS. Kaplan–Meier analysis and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were utilized to assess the association between PPM implantation and long-term survival. RESULTS A total of 3391 (2991 non-PPM and 400 PPM) patients met the study criteria. Significant predictors of PPM included increased decade of age (odds ratio: 1.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.12–1.35), concomitant aortic (1.44; 1.10–1.90) and tricuspid valve procedures (2.21; 1.64–2.97) and prior history of myocardial infarction (1.48; 1.07–1.86). In the isolated MV repair population, annuloplasty with ring prosthesis was associated with PPM (3.09; 1.19–8.02). Patients in the replacement population did not have significant identifiable risk factors. There was no survival difference found, and postoperative PPM placement was not found to be an independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS Our primary aim was to elucidate predictors for PPM implantation in MVS and found increasing age and concomitant procedures to be risk factors. Receipt of PPM is associated with worse long-term survival but does not independently predict survival. Among patients undergoing isolated MV repair, use of an annuloplasty ring confers a higher risk of PPM compared to an annuloplasty band.

Abstract 2305: Determinants of Outcomes Following Mitral Valve Surgery in Patients with Severe Organic Mitral Regurgitation and No or Mild Symptoms

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Magne ◽  
Patrick Mathieu ◽  
François Dagenais ◽  
Eric Charbonneau ◽  
Jean G Dumesnil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Mortality

The optimal timing of mitral valve surgery in patients with severe organic mitral regurgitation (OMR) and no or mild symptoms is highly controversial. The aim of this study was thus to determine the preoperative predictors of mortality following mitral valve surgery in patients with severe OMR and no or mild symptoms. Preoperative and operative data of 324 patients (65% of male, mean age: 65±13 years) with severe OMR and no/mild symptoms (NYHA class I and II) who underwent mitral valve surgery between 1992 and 2007 were prospectively collected in a computerized database. Mitral valve repair (MVRp) was performed in 132 (41%) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) in 187 (59%) patients. Operative mortality was low for both procedures (whole cohort: n=9, 2.7%; MVRp: n=2, 1.5%; MVR: n=7, 3.7%; p=0.34) but was significantly higher in the patients (n=167, 56%) with impaired preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (<60%) (5.3% vs. 1.2%, p=0.04). Long-term survival was 93±2% at 5 years and 87±3% at 10 years. Patients with LVEF<60% had significantly reduced long-term survival compared to patients with normal LVEF (5-year: 89±4% vs. 95±5%, 10-year: 80±6% vs. 88±4%, p=0.049). Multivariate analysis identified age (Hazard-ratio [HR]= 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1–1.08, p=0.02), heart failure (HR= 1.9, 95%CI: 1.3–3, p= 0.0018), and LVEF (HR= 1.04, 95%CI: 1.01–1.07, p=0.0253) as independent predictors of long-term mortality. Furthermore, MVR was not associated with worse long-term survival on both univariate (p=0.83) and multivariate (p=0.98) analysis. Performing mitral valve surgery is safe in patients with severe OMR and no or mild symptoms. Impaired LVEF is associated with increased short- and long-term mortality, suggesting that these patients should be promptly operated before the onset of LV dysfunction.

Long‐term risk of heart failure and mortality following mitral valve surgery in patients with and without right ventricular pacemaker

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 2598-2604
Author(s):  
Charlotte Andersson ◽  
Morten Schou ◽  
Gunnar H. Gislason ◽  
Lars Køber ◽  
Christian Torp‐Pedersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Valve Surgery

scholarly journals Minimally invasive or sternotomy approach in mitral valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Pojar ◽  
Mikita Karalko ◽  
Martin Dergel ◽  
Jan Vojacek
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Median Sternotomy ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Minimally Invasive Approach ◽  
Conventional Surgery ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Invasive Approach

Abstract Objectives Conventional mitral valve surgery through median sternotomy improves long-term survival with acceptable morbidity and mortality. However, less-invasive approaches to mitral valve surgery are now increasingly employed. Whether minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is superior to conventional surgery is uncertain. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent mitral valve surgery via minithoracotomy or median sternotomy between 2012 and 2018. A propensity score-matched analysis was generated to eliminate differences in relevant preoperative risk factors between the two groups. Results Data from 525 patients were evaluated, 189 underwent minithoracotomy and 336 underwent median sternotomy. The 30 day mortality was similar between the minithoracotomy and conventional surgery groups (1 and 3%, respectively; p = 0.25). No differences were seen in the incidence of stroke (p = 1.00), surgical site infections (p = 0.09), or myocardial infarction (p = 0.23), or in total hospital cost (p = 0.48). However, the minimally invasive approach was associated with fewer patients receiving transfusions (59% versus 76% in the conventional group; p = 0.001) or requiring reoperation for bleeding (3% versus 9%, respectively; p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in 5 year survival between the minithoracotomy and conventional surgery groups (93% versus 86%, respectively; p = 0.21) and freedom from mitral valve reoperation (95% versus 94%, respectively; p = 0.79). Conclusions In patients undergoing mitral valve surgery, a minimally invasive approach is feasible, safe, and reproducible with excellent short-term outcomes; mid-term outcomes and efficacy were also seen to be comparable to conventional sternotomy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document