Utility of MIB-1 and estrogen and progesterone receptor in distinguishing between endometrial stromal sarcomas and endometrial stromal nodules, highly cellular leiomyomas

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Kir ◽  
H. Cetiner ◽  
A. Karateke ◽  
A. Gurbuz ◽  
D. Bulbul

It is difficult to differentiate between an endometrial stromal nodule (ESN) and endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) in curettage specimen, and the recommended therapy of endometrial stromal neoplasm is hysterectomy. If we could discriminate ESS from ESN in curettage specimens, there would be an opportunity to treat ESN by local excision rather than by hysterectomy. We analyzed MIB-1 and estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) expression in a retrospective series of 8 ESSs, 7 ESNs, and 17 highly cellular leiomyomas obtained from hysterectomy specimens. ESSs expressed MIB-1 more frequently than ESNs (P < 0.05), and ESSs had a tendency to express ER less frequently than ESNs (P = 0.08). We observed that in spite of showing MIB-1 expression to some extent, highly cellular leiomyomas usually could not reach ESSs' level and frequency of MIB-1 expression in the current study. Although MIB-1 and ER appear to be promising markers in the differential diagnosis of ESSs, a larger study would be necesary to confirm their validity.

2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary L. Balleine ◽  
Peter J. Earls ◽  
Lucy R. Webster ◽  
Patricia A. Mote ◽  
Anna deFazio ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Qiao Wang ◽  
Xia Zhao ◽  
Ping Han

Extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) arising in endometriosis is extremely rare, particularly in the colorectum. It should always be included in the differential diagnosis of primary tumors originating from gastrointestinal tract in females, given that preoperative endoscopical biopsy may reveal no specific changes. We reported a case of ESS arising in colorectal endometriosis and reviewed the previous 7 cases reported in the English literature. Our patient, who was unavailable for tumor resection and refused further adjuvant therapy, played a role in representing the natural history of low-grade extragenital ESS. This case was the only death from ESS arising in colorectal endometriosis.


2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 899-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Biliatis ◽  
Nikolaos Akrivos ◽  
Maria Sotiropoulou ◽  
Alexandros Rodolakis ◽  
Maria Simou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Nan Zhang ◽  
Man Bai ◽  
Ke-Ran Ma ◽  
Yong Zhang ◽  
Cheng-Ru Song ◽  
...  

Objective: The present study aimed to explore the application value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) histograms with multiple sequences in the preoperative differential diagnosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) and degenerative hysteromyoma (DH).Methods: The clinical and preoperative MRI data of 20 patients with pathologically confirmed ESS and 24 patients with pathologically confirmed DH were retrospectively analyzed, forming the two study groups. Mazda software was used to select the MRI layer with the largest tumor diameter in T2WI, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and enhanced T1WI (T1CE) images. The region of interest (ROI) was outlined for gray-scale histogram analysis. Nine parameters—the mean, variance, kurtosis, skewness, 1st percentile, 10th percentile, 50th percentile, 90th percentile, and 99th percentile—were obtained for intergroup analysis, and the receiver operating curves (ROCs) were plotted to analyze the differential diagnostic efficacy for each parameter.Results: In the T2WI histogram, the differences between the two groups in seven of the parameters (mean, skewness, 1st percentile, 10th percentile, 50th percentile, 90th percentile, and 99th percentile) were statistically significant (P &lt; 0.05). In the ADC histogram, the differences between the two groups in three of the parameters (skewness, 10th percentile, and 50th percentile) were statistically significant (P &lt; 0.05). In the T1CE histogram, no significant differences were found between the two groups in any of the parameters (all P &gt; 0.05). Of the nine parameters, the 50th percentile was found to have the best diagnostic efficacy. In the T2WI histogram, ROC curve analysis of the 50th percentile yielded the best area under the ROC curve (AUC; 0.742), sensitivity of 70%, and specificity of 83.3%. In the ADC histogram, ROC curve analysis of the 50th percentile yielded the best area under the ROC curve (AUC; 0.783), sensitivity of 81%, and specificity of 76.9%.Conclusion: The parameters of the mean, 10th percentile and 50th percentile in the T2WI histogram have good diagnostic efficacy, providing new methods and ideas for clinical diagnosis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 098-101
Author(s):  
Harish Shetty ◽  
Prasanna K. Kumar Shetty ◽  
Aparna Rajesh ◽  
J.C. Spandana

AbstractEndometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare malignant tumor, occurring in the age group of 40-50 years. We report a case of lowgrade ESS in a 42 year old women, presenting as rapid enlargement of uterus associated with excessive vaginal bleeding. ESS can be mistaken for leiomyoma. Histopathological examination remains the mainstay for diagnosis of such tumors. Although rare, ESS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all women who present with a rapid enlargement of a uterine leiomyoma.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weilin Zhao ◽  
Cui Mei ◽  
Xin Hua Ji ◽  
Xin Xiong ◽  
Xi Hua Shen ◽  
...  

Abstract The differential diagnosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) and uterine cellular leiomyoma (CL) remains a challenge in clinical practice. Cluster of differentiation 10 (CD10) and smooth muscle actin (SMA) are commonly used in the differential diagnosis of ESS and CL. However, the current combination of immunohistochemical antibodies has been shown to be inaccurate, suggesting the need for novel immunomarkers panels for differentiating between ESS and CL. Interferon-induced transmembrane protein 1 (IFITM1) is a novel immunomarker for endometrial stromal cells, h-caldesmon is an immunomarker for smooth muscle cells and has a higher specificity than SMA. So this study aimed to investigate IFITM1, CD10, SMA, and h-caldesmon as a useful combination of biomarkers for diagnosing between ESS and CL. Tissue microarrays were used to detect IFITM1, CD10, SMA, and h-caldesmon immunohistochemical staining in 30 ESS and 33 CL cases. The expressions of IFITM1 and CD10 were high in ESS (86.7% and 63.3%, respectively) but low in CL (18.2% and 21.2%), whereas those of h-caldesmon and SMA were high in both CL (87.9% and 100%) and low in ESS (6.9% and 40%). In diagnosing ESS, IFITM1 had better sensitivity and specificity (86.7% and 81.8%, respectively) than CD10 (63.3% and 78.8%). The specificity of h-caldesmon in diagnosing CL was significantly higher (93.1%) than that of SMA (60%). When all four antibodies were combined for the differential diagnosis, the area-under-the-curve predictive value was 0.995. The most sensitive and specific combinations for diagnosing ESS were IFITM1(+) or CD10(+) and h-caldesmon(-) ( sensitivity 86.7%, specificity 93.9%), IFITM1(+) and h-caldesmon(-) ((sensitivity 80%, specificity 100%). The most sensitive and specific combinations for diagnosing CL were h-caldesmon(+) and SMA(+)(sensitivity 87.9%, specificity 100%), h-caldesmon(+) or SMA(+) and IFITM1(-)(sensitivity 81.8% , specificity 93.1%).Therefore, IFITM1, CD10, SMA, and h-caldesmon are a good combination of biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of ESS and CL.The differential diagnosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) and uterine cellular leiomyoma (CL) remains a challenge in clinical practice. Cluster of differentiation 10 (CD10) and smooth muscle actin (SMA) are commonly used in the differential diagnosis of ESS and CL. However, the current combination of immunohistochemical antibodies has been shown to be inaccurate, suggesting the need for novel immunomarkers panels for differentiating between ESS and CL. Interferon-induced transmembrane protein 1 (IFITM1) is a novel immunomarker for endometrial stromal cells, h-caldesmon is an immunomarker for smooth muscle cells and has a higher specificity than SMA. So this study aimed to investigate IFITM1, CD10, SMA, and h-caldesmon as a useful combination of biomarkers for diagnosing between ESS and CL. Tissue microarrays were used to detect IFITM1, CD10, SMA, and h-caldesmon immunohistochemical staining in 30 ESS and 33 CL cases. The expressions of IFITM1 and CD10 were high in ESS (86.7% and 63.3%, respectively) but low in CL (18.2% and 21.2%), whereas those of h-caldesmon and SMA were high in both CL (87.9% and 100%) and low in ESS (6.9% and 40%). In diagnosing ESS, IFITM1 had better sensitivity and specificity (86.7% and 81.8%, respectively) than CD10 (63.3% and 78.8%). The specificity of h-caldesmon in diagnosing CL was significantly higher (93.1%) than that of SMA (60%). When all four antibodies were combined for the differential diagnosis, the area-under-the-curve predictive value was 0.995. The most sensitive and specific combinations for diagnosing ESS were IFITM1(+) or CD10(+) and h-caldesmon(-) ( sensitivity 86.7%, specificity 93.9%), IFITM1(+) and h-caldesmon(-) ((sensitivity 80%, specificity 100%). The most sensitive and specific combinations for diagnosing CL were h-caldesmon(+) and SMA(+)(sensitivity 87.9%, specificity 100%), h-caldesmon(+) or SMA(+) and IFITM1(-)(sensitivity 81.8% , specificity 93.1%).Therefore, IFITM1, CD10, SMA, and h-caldesmon are a good combination of biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of ESS and CL.The differential diagnosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) and uterine cellular leiomyoma (CL) remains a challenge in clinical practice. Cluster of differentiation 10 (CD10) and smooth muscle actin (SMA) are commonly used in the differential diagnosis of ESS and CL. However, the current combination of immunohistochemical antibodies has been shown to be inaccurate, suggesting the need for novel immunomarkers panels for differentiating between ESS and CL. Interferon-induced transmembrane protein 1 (IFITM1) is a novel immunomarker for endometrial stromal cells, h-caldesmon is an immunomarker for smooth muscle cells and has a higher specificity than SMA. So this study aimed to investigate IFITM1, CD10, SMA, and h-caldesmon as a useful combination of biomarkers for diagnosing between ESS and CL. Tissue microarrays were used to detect IFITM1, CD10, SMA, and h-caldesmon immunohistochemical staining in 30 ESS and 33 CL cases. The expressions of IFITM1 and CD10 were high in ESS (86.7% and 63.3%, respectively) but low in CL (18.2% and 21.2%), whereas those of h-caldesmon and SMA were high in both CL (87.9% and 100%) and low in ESS (6.9% and 40%). In diagnosing ESS, IFITM1 had better sensitivity and specificity (86.7% and 81.8%, respectively) than CD10 (63.3% and 78.8%). The specificity of h-caldesmon in diagnosing CL was significantly higher (93.1%) than that of SMA (60%). When all four antibodies were combined for the differential diagnosis, the area-under-the-curve predictive value was 0.995. The most sensitive and specific combinations for diagnosing ESS were IFITM1(+) or CD10(+) and h-caldesmon(-) ( sensitivity 86.7%, specificity 93.9%), IFITM1(+) and h-caldesmon(-) ((sensitivity 80%, specificity 100%). The most sensitive and specific combinations for diagnosing CL were h-caldesmon(+) and SMA(+)(sensitivity 87.9%, specificity 100%), h-caldesmon(+) or SMA(+) and IFITM1(-)(sensitivity 81.8% , specificity 93.1%).Therefore, IFITM1, CD10, SMA, and h-caldesmon are a good combination of biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of ESS and CL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document