scholarly journals Certification and coding of two underlying causes of death in The Netherlands and other countries of the European Community.

1987 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
J P Mackenbach ◽  
W M Van Duyne ◽  
M C Kelson
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 235-235
Author(s):  
Wytske Meekes ◽  
C J Leemrijse ◽  
J C Korevaar ◽  
L A M van de Goor

Abstract Falls are an important health threat among frail older people. Physicians are often the first to contact for health issues and can be seen as designated professionals to provide fall prevention. However, it is unknown what they exactly do and why regarding fall prevention. This study aims to describe what physicians in the Netherlands do during daily practice in regards to fall prevention. About 65 physicians (34 practices) located throughout the Netherlands were followed up for 12 months. When a physician entered specific ICPC-codes related to frailty and falls in the Hospital Information System, the physician received a pop-up asking if the patient is frail. If so, the physician subsequently completed a questionnaire. The physicians completed 1396 questionnaires. More than half (n=726) of the patients had experienced a fall in the previous year and/or had a fear of falling (FOF) and 37% of these patients received fall prevention. Physicians did not know of 20% of the patients if they had experienced a fall and of 29% of the patients if they had a FOF. The three most often treated underlying causes were mobility problems, FOF and cardiovascular risk factors. The results show that physicians are not always aware of a patient’s fall history and/or FOF and that only part of these patients receives fall prevention. Hence, it might be important to develop and implement strategies for systematic fall risk screening and fall prevention provision in the primary care setting to reduce falls among frail older people.


1982 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Gittelsohn

2003 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. KAUFMANN

Management deficiencies on the part of the pastoralists were claimed to be one of the major causes of the high losses of camel (Camelus dromedarius) calves contributing to low productivity of camel herds. In the present study, calf deaths, and the causes thereof, were analysed in connection with pastoral calf management in order to assess possible relationships. Progeny history data on 1506 Rendille, 789 Gabra and 1206 Somali calves born between 1980 and 1995 provided quantitative information on losses and the underlying causes. Assessment of the causes of death, and analysis of related management practices, led to suggestions for management changes. In feedback seminars with pastoralists, however, it became apparent that these management changes would not be adopted because they contradicted the pastoralists' assumptions on the causes of calf mortality. The discussions revealed that differences between pastoralists' and scientists' perceptions determined different opinions on proper calf-rearing management practices. Combining different knowledge systems offers the possibility of a more complete understanding, which is required for the derivation of adoptable calf mortality-reducing interventions that are compatible with the knowledge and production systems of the pastoralists.


1977 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 53-68
Author(s):  
J. J. McCutcheon

The purpose of this paper is to analyse briefly the relative significance of the principal causes of death which currently prevail in the United Kingdom. The work is a sequel to that of references and, in which various life tables were produced from the data of the 1971 U.K. census and the numbers of deaths during the years 1970 to 1972. These earlier papers, however, study mortality without reference to the underlying causes of death.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-225
Author(s):  
Hyeji Lee ◽  
Sun Hyu Kim ◽  
Byungho Choi ◽  
Minsu Ock ◽  
Eun Ji Park

2021 ◽  
pp. 377-382
Author(s):  
Michael Obladen

Since antiquity, cot death was explained as accidental suffocation, overlaying, or smothering. Parents were blamed for neglect or drunkenness, and a cage called arcuccio was invented around 1570 to protect the sleeping infant. Up to the 19th century, accidents were registered as natural causes of death. From 1830, accidental suffocation became unacceptable for physicians and legislators, and ‘natural’ explanations for the catastrophe were sought, with parents being consoled rather than blamed. Prone sleeping originated in the 1930s and from 1944 was associated with cot death. However, from the 1960s many authors recommended prone sleeping for infants, and many countries adopted the advice. A worldwide epidemic followed, peaking at 2% in England and Wales and 5% in New Zealand in the 1980s. Although epidemiological evidence was available by 1970, the first intervention was initiated in the Netherlands in 1989. Cot death disappeared almost entirely wherever prone sleeping was avoided. This strongly supports the assumption that prone sleeping has the greatest influence on the disorder, and that the epidemic resulted from wrong advice.


2017 ◽  
pp. 153-174
Author(s):  
Jolianne M. Rijks ◽  
Margriet G.E. Montizaan ◽  
Hans Dannenberg ◽  
Lenie A. Algra-Verkerk ◽  
Delphine H. Nourisson ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 384 (9939) ◽  
pp. 241-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colette J Smith ◽  
Lene Ryom ◽  
Rainer Weber ◽  
Philippe Morlat ◽  
Christian Pradier ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document