scholarly journals Diffuse axonal injury in non-missile head injury.

1991 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 481-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
J H Adams ◽  
D I Graham ◽  
T A Gennarelli ◽  
W L Maxwell
Author(s):  
Fang Wang ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
Lin Hu ◽  
Hongzhen Xu ◽  
Chao Yu ◽  
...  

This study evaluates the effectiveness of various widely used head injury criteria (HICs) in predicting vulnerable road user (VRU) head injuries due to road traffic accidents. Thirty-one real-world car-to-VRU impact accident cases with detailed head injury records were collected and replicated through the computational biomechanics method; head injuries observed in the analyzed accidents were reconstructed by using a finite element (FE)-multibody (MB) coupled pedestrian model [including the Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS) head–neck FE model and the remaining body segments of TNO MB pedestrian model], which was developed and validated in our previous study. Various typical HICs were used to predict head injuries in all accident cases. Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis method was adopted to investigate the correlation between head kinematics-based injury criteria and the actual head injury of VRU; the effectiveness of brain deformation-based injury criteria in predicting typical brain injuries [such as diffuse axonal injury diffuse axonal injury (DAI) and contusion] was assessed by using head injury risk curves reported in the literature. Results showed that for head kinematics-based injury criteria, the most widely used HICs and head impact power (HIP) can accurately and effectively predict head injury, whereas for brain deformation-based injury criteria, the maximum principal strain (MPS) behaves better than cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM0.15 and CSDM0.25) in predicting the possibility of DAI. In comparison with the dilatation damage measure (DDM), MPS seems to better predict the risk of brain contusion.


2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuhiko Maruichi ◽  
Satoshi Kuroda ◽  
Yasuhiro Chiba ◽  
Masaaki Hokari ◽  
Hideo Shichinohe ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Minoru Shigemori ◽  
N. Kikuchi ◽  
T. Tokutomi ◽  
S. Ochiai ◽  
S. Kuramoto

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Wild ◽  
C. S. A. Macmillan ◽  
J. M. Wardlaw ◽  
I. Marshall ◽  
J. Cannon ◽  
...  

Brain Injury ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 401-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus-W. Wallesch ◽  
Noreen Curio ◽  
Susanne Kutz ◽  
Stefan Jost ◽  
Claudius Bartels ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 556-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toril Skandsen ◽  
Kjell Arne Kvistad ◽  
Ole Solheim ◽  
Ingrid Haavde Strand ◽  
Mari Folvik ◽  
...  

Object In this prospective cohort study the authors examined patients with moderate to severe head injuries using MR imaging in the early phase. The objective was to explore the occurrence of diffuse axonal injury (DAI) and determine whether DAI was related to level of consciousness and patient outcome. Methods One hundred and fifty-nine patients (age range 5–65 years) with traumatic brain injury, who survived the acute phase, and who had a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3–13 were admitted between October 2004 and August 2008. Of these 159 patients, 106 were examined using MR imaging within 4 weeks postinjury. Patients were classified into 1 of 3 stages of DAI: Stage 1, in which lesions were confined to the lobar white matter; Stage 2, in which there were callosal lesions; and Stage 3, in which lesions occurred in the dorsolateral brainstem. The outcome measure used 12 months postinjury was the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended (GOSE). Results Diffuse axonal injury was detected in 72% of the patients and a combination of DAI and contusions or hematomas was found in 50%. The GCS score was significantly lower in patients with “pure DAI” (median GCS Score 9) than in patients without DAI (median GCS Score 12; p < 0.001). The GCS score was related to outcome only in those patients with DAI (r = 0.47; p = 0.001). Patients with DAI had a median GOSE score of 7, and patients without DAI had a median GOSE score of 8 (p = 0.10). Outcome was better in patients with DAI Stage 1 (median GOSE Score 8) and DAI Stage 2 (median GOSE Score 7.5) than in patients with DAI Stage 3 (median GOSE Score 4; p < 0.001). Thus, in patients without any brainstem injury, there was no difference in good recovery between patients with DAI (67%) and patients without DAI (66%). Conclusions Diffuse axonal injury was found in almost three-quarters of the patients with moderate and severe head injury who survived the acute phase. Diffuse axonal injury influenced the level of consciousness, and only in patients with DAI was GCS score related to outcome. Finally, DAI was a negative prognostic sign only when located in the brainstem.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document