scholarly journals 44 Palliative simulation for internal medicine trainees (PALL-SIM-IM): a nationally adopted education initiative in response to shape of training

Author(s):  
Kate Howorth ◽  
Kerry Waterfield ◽  
Felicity Dewhurst ◽  
Emily Kavanagh ◽  
Jo Brown ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Njeim ◽  
Maguy Chiha ◽  
Sarah Whitehouse ◽  
Kimberly Baker-Genaw

Abstract Background A literature gap exists in educating internal medicine residents about hospital readmissions and how to prevent them. Intervention The study aimed to implement a readmissions education initiative for general internal medicine inpatient resident teams in 3 general practice units at an urban, tertiary hospital. Methods Senior residents were given access to a daily list of readmissions, used a readmission assessment tool to investigate causes and to assess whether each readmission was preventable, led a monthly general practice unit team meeting to discuss each case, and presented their findings at the monthly multidisciplinary readmissions meeting for additional feedback. For program evaluation, we hypothesized that the “preventable” readmissions count tracked via the readmissions assessment tool would increase as residents became better educated on the root causes of readmissions. We also conducted a survey to assess perception of the readmissions education initiative. Results “Preventable” readmissions increased from 21% for the first 3 months of the intervention (September–November 2010) to 46% for the most recent 3 months (January–March 2011). The survey showed that 98% (41 of 42) of respondents who had attended a multidisciplinary readmissions meeting felt involved in an effort to review or improve the rate of hospital readmissions, whereas only 40% (21 of 53) of the group that never attended a session shared the same answer. Conclusions This initiative required few resources, and it appeared to help residents identify “preventable” reasons for readmissions, as well as increased their perceptions of being actively involved in reducing hospital readmissions. The intervention was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in readmissions, which may be influenced primarily by multiple factors outside residents' control.


2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 13-15
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Demeter

Abstract A long-standing criticism of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) has been the inequity between the internal medicine ratings and the orthopedic ratings; in the comparison, internal medicine ratings appear inflated. A specific goal of the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, was to diminish, where possible, those disparities. This led to the use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the World Health Organization in the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, including the addition of the burden of treatment compliance (BOTC). The BOTC originally was intended to allow rating internal medicine conditions using the types and numbers of medications as a surrogate measure of the severity of a condition when other, more traditional methods, did not exist or were insufficient. Internal medicine relies on step-wise escalation of treatment, and BOTC usefully provides an estimate of impairment based on the need to be compliant with treatment. Simplistically, the need to take more medications may indicate a greater impairment burden. BOTC is introduced in the first chapter of the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, which clarifies that “BOTC refers to the impairment that results from adhering to a complex regimen of medications, testing, and/or procedures to achieve an objective, measurable, clinical improvement that would not occur, or potentially could be reversed, in the absence of compliance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document