Awareness and impact of New York City's graphic point-of-sale tobacco health warning signs

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (e1) ◽  
pp. e51-e56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Micaela H Coady ◽  
Christina A Chan ◽  
Kari Auer ◽  
Shannon M Farley ◽  
Elizabeth A Kilgore ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 888-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annice E. Kim ◽  
James M. Nonnemaker ◽  
Brett R. Loomis ◽  
Paul R. Shafer ◽  
Asma Shaikh ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mark Jeffery ◽  
Joseph F. Norton ◽  
Derek Yung ◽  
Alex Gershbeyn

The case concerns a real $25 million program consisting of nine concurrent projects to deliver and implement a custom-built in-store customer relationship management (CRM) system and a new point-of-sale system in 400 stores of a national retail chain. The name of the company has been disguised for confidentiality reasons. Once deployed, the new system should give Clothes ‘R’ Us a significant strategic advantage over competitors in the marketplace; it will increase in-store manager productivity, cut costs, and ultimately drive increased sales for the retail chain. The program is in crisis, however, because the product managers have just left to join a competitor. The explicit details of the program are given, including examples of best practice program governance and the real activity network diagram for the program. Detailed Excel spreadsheets are also provided with the actual earned value data for the program. Students analyze the spreadsheets and the data given in the case to diagnose the impact of the most recent risk event and past risk events that occurred in the program. Ultimately students must answer the essential executive questions: What is wrong with the program? How should it be fixed, and what is the impact in time and money to the program? In addition, qualitative warning signs are given throughout the case—these warning signs are red flags to executives for early proactive intervention in troubled projects.The goal of the case is to teach complex program oversight. Students analyze actual earned value data for a real $25 million program consisting of nine concurrent programs and assess the impact of risk events as they occur in the program. A key takeaway of the case is that relatively simple tools (Excel spreadsheets and time tracking) combined with good project planning can be used to effectively control very complex projects. Students also learn the qualitative warning signs within programs that can serve as early indicators of problems.


Health ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (08) ◽  
pp. 886-902
Author(s):  
Thérèse Nyangi Mondo Mambu ◽  
Patrick Kalambayi Kayembe ◽  
Myriam Malengreau ◽  
Bruno Dimonfu Lapika

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. e20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Cantrell ◽  
Ollie Ganz ◽  
Vinu Ilakkuvan ◽  
Michael Tacelosky ◽  
Jennifer Kreslake ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Needham Waddell ◽  
Rachel Sacks ◽  
Shannon M. Farley ◽  
Michael Johns

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-331
Author(s):  
William G Shadel ◽  
Steven C Martino ◽  
Claude M Setodji ◽  
Michael Dunbar ◽  
Deborah Scharf ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Jawad ◽  
Ali Bakir ◽  
Mohammed Ali ◽  
Aimee Grant

Background. Despite the rise in prevalence of waterpipe tobacco smoking, it has received little legislative enforcement from governing bodies, especially in the area of health warning labels.Methods. Twenty regular waterpipe tobacco smokers from London took part in five focus groups discussing the impact of waterpipe tobacco pack health warnings on their attitudes towards waterpipe smoking. We presented them with existing and mock waterpipe tobacco products, designed to be compliant with current and future UK/EU legislation. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.Results. Participants felt packs were less attractive and health warnings were more impactful as health warnings increased in size and packaging became less branded. However, participants highlighted their lack of exposure to waterpipe tobacco pack health warnings due to the inherent nature of waterpipe smoking, that is, smoking in a café with the apparatus already prepacked by staff. Health warnings at the point of consumption had more reported impact than health warnings at the point of sale.Conclusions. Waterpipe tobacco pack health warnings are likely to be effective if compliant with existing laws and exposed to end-users. Legislations should be reviewed to extend health warning labels to waterpipe accessories, particularly the apparatus, and to waterpipe-serving premises.


2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 468-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett R. Loomis ◽  
Annice E. Kim ◽  
Andrew H. Busey ◽  
Matthew C. Farrelly ◽  
Jeffrey G. Willett ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol L. Schmitt ◽  
Harlan R. Juster ◽  
Daniel Dench ◽  
Jeffrey Willett ◽  
Laurel E. Curry

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document