Comparative anatomy of roots and mycorrhizae of common Ontario trees

1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 551-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Brundrett ◽  
Gracia Murase ◽  
Bryce Kendrick

The structure of roots and mycorrhizae of trees belonging to 20 important Ontario tree genera were examined. During this study efficient methods for examining root anatomy were developed, and tree root information was compiled. The ultimate lateral roots of most species examined were consistently mycorrhizal, and many species had heterorhizic root systems with separate long and short lateral roots. Tree roots displayed enough structural diversity in features such as thickened, lignified, or suberized walls, and secondary metabolite-containing cells to allow identification of genera. The roots of trees belonged to four major anatomical groups as a result of the major differences between angiosperm and gymnosperm roots, and between those with ectomycorrhizal (ECM) or vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) associations, (i) Members of the Pinaceae had structurally similar heterorhizic roots that had ECM with a cortical Hartig net. (ii) Thuja (Cupressaceae) had distinctive nonheterorhizic roots with phi thickenings and VAM. (iii) Angiosperms with ECM belonged to diverse families, but all had similar heterorhizic root systems with ECM short roots that had an epidermal Hartig net and a narrow cortex of thick-walled cells, (iv) Most angiosperms with VAM had nonheterorhizic roots, and this group had the greatest diversity of root structural features. Possible structural and defensive roles of root features and potential influences of these features on mycorrhizal formation are considered.

Botany ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 607-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugues B. Massicotte ◽  
R. Larry Peterson ◽  
Lewis H. Melville ◽  
Linda E. Tackaberry

Most species in the family Cistaceae are found in the Mediterranean basin. Several hosts are of special interest, owing to their associations with truffle species, while many are important as pioneer plants in disturbed areas and in soil stabilization. For these reasons, understanding their root systems and their associated fungal symbionts is important. Most studies of the structure of mycorrhizas in this family involve two genera, Cistus and Helianthemum . The present study examines structural features of mycorrhizas in two North American species, Hudsonia ericoides L. and Hudsonia tomentosa Nutt. Root systems of both species are highly branched with most fine roots colonized by mycorrhizal fungi. Based on morphological features, several mycorrhizal fungi were identified; structural details also provided evidence of more than one fungal symbiont for each host species. All mycorrhizas had a multi-layered fungal mantle and Hartig net hyphae confined to radially elongated epidermal cells; no intracellular hyphae were observed. Although the Hartig net was confined to the epidermis, the outer row of cortical cell walls lacked suberin, a known barrier to fungal penetration. Mycorrhizas in H. ericoides and H. tomentosa differed from those of Cistus and Helianthemum species that have a Hartig net that extends into the root cortex, as well as frequently present intracellular hyphae.


1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 1039-1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Toth ◽  
Deborah Toth ◽  
David Starke ◽  
David R. Smith

Inbred lines of Zea mays L. (maize) selected for a range of resistances to a variety of fungal pathogens were assayed for percentage colonization by vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Inbreds that were generally resistant to a number of fungal pathogens had significantly lower levels of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizae, matured more slowly, and had larger root systems. Disease-susceptible inbreds had significantly higher levels of mycorrhizal colonization, matured more rapidly, and had smaller root systems. It is uncertain if a general resistance to fungal pathogens or rate of root development, separately or in combination, may have influenced mycorrhizal colonization levels. Irrespective of cause, present breeding programs for disease resistance in maize do influence the plants ability to form mycorrhizae.


Soil Research ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 429 ◽  
Author(s):  
JM Tisdall ◽  
JM Oades

The root system of ryegrass was more efficient than that of white clover in stabilizing aggregates of Lemnos loam because ryegrass supported a larger population of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae in the soil. Electron micrographs show that the hyphae were covered with a layer of amorphous material, probably polysaccharide, to which clay particles appear firmly attached.


1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1164-1173 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. L. Strong ◽  
G. H. La Roi

Twenty-four specimens of six boreal tree species were excavated: eight Pinusbanksiana Lamb., five Populustremuloides Michx., four Piceaglauca (Moench) Voss, three Piceamariana (Mill.) B.S.P., two Abiesbalsamea (L.) Mills., and two Lara laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch. Root systems were described, and percent biomass determined for above- and below-ground components for half these specimens. Tree ages ranged from 3 to 120 years. Horizontally spreading lateral roots dominated the root systems of all species and occurred within 3– 15 cm of the ground surface. Nutrient and moisture absorption appear to be the principal functions of lateral roots. Maximum vertical root growth occurred near the tree stump as: tap-, heart, sinker, and oblique lateral roots. Vertical root morphology is influenced by site conditions. In addition to providing mechanical support, sinker and taproots may be important adaptations for deep-water utilization on xeric sites. Our data suggest that roots may be important in boreal succession processes through two related mechanisms: (i) nutrient and water deprivation occurring through preemptive growth of tree roots from climax species over roots of serai species, and through interception by mosses; and (ii) niche partitioning occurring below ground between serai and climax, and among climax tree species, by vertical separation of the root systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document