Observations on the Proterozoic Seton Formation, East Arm of Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories

1972 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1110-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. D. Olade ◽  
R. D. Morton

The Proterozoic (Aphebian) Seton Formation is shown to extend across almost the entire length of the East Arm structural subprovince of the Great Slave Lake region, Northwest Territories. Earlier described as greenstones or basalts and recently as an andesite–rhyolite suite, the volcanic rocks which characterize the Seton Formation are clearly of spilitic–keratophyric affinity. The formation is composed of a sequence of marine to subaerial, spilitic basalt flows, trachytic flows, quartz keratophyric–and spilitic–basic pyroclastics, volcanic sandstones, jasper, banded ironstones, and intercalated marine epiclastic sedimentary rocks. Small hypabyssal intrusions of albite granophyre, albite, and quartz porphyry represent minor subvolcanic phases. Petrographic descriptions of the lavas and pyroclastic rocks from Toopon Lake, the Fort Reliance area, and Seton Island are augmented by partial chemical analyses of 15 lavas from the latter locality. The volcanic–sedimentary Seton Formation, 1300 m thick in the SW of the East Arm, and 40 m thick in the Fort Reliance district, should be classified as a member of the Sosan Group, being in part laterally equivalent to the Akaitcho River Formation and the upper Kluziai Formation. The Aphebian Coronation Geosyncline during Seton times was thus characterized by effusive (partially submarine) island volcanism in the SW of the region, contemporaneous with shallow marine sedimentation towards the northeast part of the basin.

1969 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 137 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Thomson ◽  
George W. Scotter ◽  
Teuvo Ahti

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
I R Smith ◽  
S J A Day ◽  
R C Paulen ◽  
D G Pearson

Till (n=196) and stream sediment (n=60) samples were collected in the area south and west of Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories (NTS 85B, C, F, and G), over the course of 3 summer field seasons. Samples were processed to recover kimberlite and other indicator minerals. This report summarizes results of the kimberlite indicator mineral (KIM) studies, including measures of KIM mineral types, abundances, and chemistry (major, trace, and rare earth elements). KIMs were present in 24% of the samples collected, and only 183 KIM grains in total were recovered, of which Cr-pyrope garnets were the most abundant (65.6%). Chemical analyses revealed strong similarities to the Drybones Bay and Mud Lake kimberlites which are situated 50 to >100 km to the northeast, roughly aligned with prominent glacially streamlined landform flowsets in this field area. Results suggest there is little evidence for undetected kimberlite outcrop or sub-crop in the study area.


1969 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
John W. Thomson ◽  
George W. Scotter ◽  
Teuvo Ahti

Minerals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 274
Author(s):  
Zhitao Xu ◽  
Jinggui Sun ◽  
Xiaolong Liang ◽  
Zhikai Xu ◽  
Xiaolei Chu

Late Mesozoic intermediate–felsic volcanics and hypabyssal intrusions are common across the western slope of the Great Xing’an Range (GXAR). Spatiotemporally, these hypabyssal intrusions are closely associated with epithermal Pb–Zn polymetallic deposits. However, few studies have investigated the petrogenesis, contributions and constraints of these Pb–Zn polymetallic mineralization-related intrusions. Therefore, we examine the representative Erdaohezi deposit and show that these mineralization-related hypabyssal intrusions are composed of quartz porphyry and andesite porphyry with concordant zircon U–Pb ages of 160.3 ± 1.4 Ma and 133.9 ± 0.9 Ma, respectively. These intrusions are peraluminous and high-K calc-alkaline or shoshonitic with high Na2O + K2O contents, enrichment in large ion lithophile elements (LILEs; e.g., Rb, Th, and U), and depletion in high field strength elements (HFSEs; e.g., Nb, Ta, Zr, and Hf), similar to continental arc intrusions. The zircon εHf(t) values range from 3.1 to 8.0, and the 176Hf/177Hf values range from 0.282780 to 0.282886, with Hf-based Mesoproterozoic TDM2 ages. No differences exist in the Pb isotope ratios among the quartz porphyry, andesite porphyry and ore body sulfide minerals. Detailed elemental and isotopic data imply that the quartz porphyry originated from a mixture of lower crust and newly underplated basaltic crust, while the andesite porphyry formed from the partial melting of Mesoproterozoic lower crust with the minor input of mantle materials. Furthermore, a magmatic–hydrothermal origin is favored for the Pb–Zn polymetallic mineralization in the Erdaohezi deposit. Integrating new and published tectonic evolution data, we suggest that the polymetallic mineralization-related magmatism in the Erdaohezi deposit occurred in a back-arc extensional environment at ~133 Ma in response to the rollback of the Paleo-Pacific Plate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document