Testing a model of drift-feeding using three-dimensional videography of wild brown trout, Salmo trutta, in a New Zealand river

2003 ◽  
Vol 60 (12) ◽  
pp. 1462-1476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas F Hughes ◽  
John W Hayes ◽  
Karen A Shearer ◽  
Roger G Young

We tested the assumptions and predictions of a foraging model for drift-feeding fish. We used three-dimensional videography to describe the foraging behavior of brown trout, Salmo trutta, mapped water depth and velocity in their foraging area, sampled invertebrate drift to determine length class specific drift densities, and captured trout to determine the size composition of their diet. The model overestimated the fish's prey capture rate and gross energy intake rate by a factor of two. Most of this error resulted from the fact that prey detection probabilities within the fish's foraging area averaged only half the expected value. This was the result of a rapid decrease in capture probability with increasing lateral distance from the fish's focal point. Some of the model's assumptions were accurate: equations for predicting reaction distance and minimum prey size supported reliable predictions of the shape and size of the fish's foraging area and the size composition of the diet. Other assumptions were incorrect: fish detected prey within the predicted reaction volume, not on its upstream surface as expected, fish intercepted prey more slowly than the expected maximum sustainable swimming speed, and fish captured about two-thirds of their prey downstream of their focal point, rather than upstream.


1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Sundbaum ◽  
Ingemar Näslund

We examined the effects of woody debris on the growth and behaviour of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in experimental stream channels. Two types of habitat were used in the study: a complex habitat created by placing woody debris on a gravel bed and a uniform habitat consisting of a gravel bed only. The experiment was run both outdoors with wild fish that fed on natural invertebrate drift and indoors with hatchery fish that were fed artificial food. In both treatments most of the fish lost mass. In all trials, however, the fish in the woody debris channel lost less mass than the fish in the control channel. Study of the fishes' behaviour revealed less swimming activity, less aggression, and less feeding activity in the woody debris channel than in the control channel. The results of this study indicate that the presence of woody debris decreases intraspecific competition through visual isolation, allowing fish to reduce aggressive interactions and energy expenditure.



2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 446-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
G R Guensch ◽  
T B Hardy ◽  
R C Addley

We demonstrated the ability of a mechanistic habitat selection model to predict habitat selection of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni) during summer and winter conditions in the Blacksmith Fork River, Utah. By subtracting energy costs and losses from the gross energy intake rate (GEI) obtained through simulation of prey capture, the model calculates the potential net energy intake rate (NEI) of a given stream position, which is essentially the rate of energy intake available for growth and reproduction. The prey capture model incorporates the size, swimming speed, and reaction distance of the fish; the velocity, depth, temperature, and turbidity of the water; and the density and size composition of the drifting invertebrates. The results suggest that during both summer and winter, the brown trout and mountain whitefish in our study reach avoided locations providing low NEI and preferred locations providing a high ratio of NEI to the swimming cost (SC) at the focal position of the fish (NEI/SC). This supports the idea that the drift-feeding fish in this study selected stream positions that provided adequate NEI for the least amount of swimming effort.



1986 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 1970-1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Cunjak ◽  
Geoffrey Power

Habitat utilization by brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) is described from three winters of underwater observations in a southern Ontario river. Older trout (>age 1) generally occupied positions in deeper and faster water than age 0+ trout. In winter, at sites of sympatry, brown trout occupied greater focal point water depths than brook trout; both species had similar focal point water velocities. At all sites, and for both age groups and species, there was a strong preference for positions beneath cover. Relative to summer, trout positions in winter were characterized by slower water velocities and greater overhead cover, In winter, most trout were in aggregations, usually in pools beneath cover and close to point sources of groundwater discharge. Gregarious behaviour appeared to increase as water temperatures decreased; no such relationship was evident in the summer. Specific strategies for overwintering varied between sites and age groups but generally conformed to the theory of energetic cost minimization for position choice. These variable patterns appear to be adaptive.





Hydrobiologia ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 294 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Friberg ◽  
T. H. Andersen ◽  
H. O. Hansen ◽  
T. M. Iversen ◽  
D. Jacobsen ◽  
...  


1979 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil H. Ringler

Consumption of three species of prey by brown trout (Salmo trutta) in a laboratory stream was studied during 7-d experiments. Two drift rates (5 and 10 organisms/min) and three ratios (1:1, 2:1, 5:1) of small:large alternative prey were employed. Responses to prey species stabilized after 4–6 d and 800–1200 prey captures, but no prey was completely excluded from the diet. Size-selective predation was a dominant characteristic of the response. The fish appeared to alter the area (depth) searched in response to prey density; electivity was greatest when prey densities were high. Disproportionate predation on abundant prey ("switching") was a temporary phenomenon, which may have been masked by prey size. Brown trout ultimately achieved 54–91% of a hypothetical diet in which prey are ranked in order of size (energy content). Deviations from an optimal diet may be explained in terms of a feeding strategy that deals with heterogeneous distribution of prey, as well as with the behavioral capabilities of the predator. Key words: behavior, fish, invertebrate drift, optimal foraging, predation, prey size and abundance, Salmonidae, search image, streams



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document