Seismic shear demand on wall segments of ductile coupled shear walls

2000 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 506-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
O Chaallal ◽  
D Gauthier
Keyword(s):  
Amplification Factor ◽  
Shear Walls ◽  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Dynamic Amplification Factor ◽  
Overstrength Factor ◽  
Seismic Shear ◽  
Force Reduction Factor ◽  
Force Reduction ◽  
Dynamic Amplification ◽  
Shear Demand

This paper presents the results of nonlinear dynamic analyses carried out on ductile coupled shear walls (CSWs) to investigate the seismic shear demand on wall segments. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the dynamic amplification and establish a code-format force reduction factor for shear, applicable in Canada. The study considered three Canadian seismic zones (4, 5, and 6), five numbers of storeys (6, 10, 15, 20, and 30), three degrees of coupling (low, medium, and high), and 10 historical earthquake records encompassing a broad range of frequency contents. Overall, 450 analyses were performed. Results indicate that the New Zealand amplification factor βv presently used in Canada overestimates the dynamic amplification. Additionally, the use of the overstrength factor for shear γp for tension walls may underestimate their shear resistance and result in a shear failure. Conversely, the use of γp for compression walls provided a reasonable factor of safety. Finally, for the shear design of CSWs, two alternative approaches are suggested. The first involves the use of a force reduction factor for shear, Rv, including the dynamic amplification factor γd and the overstrength factor γp as follows: Rv = 2.0 for Za > Zv, Rv = 1.0 for Za < Zv, and Rv = 1.3 for Za = Zv, where Za and Zv are acceleration- and velocity-related zonal identifiers. The second approach implies the use of the overstrength factor γp of the compression wall for both walls of CSWs and βv = 1.0.Key words: coupled shear walls, reinforced concrete, degree of coupling, seismic, frequency content, shear demand, dynamic amplification factor, force reduction factor for shear.

Seismic shear demand of ductile cantilever walls: a Canadian code perspective

1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Filiatrault ◽  
Danilo D'Aronco ◽  
René Tinawi
Keyword(s):  
Time History ◽  
Shear Walls ◽  
Analytical Investigation ◽  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Seismic Shear ◽  
Force Reduction Factor ◽  
Force Reduction ◽  
Shear Failures ◽  
Nonlinear Time History ◽  
Shear Demand

During severe earthquakes, ductile flexural walls are expected to exhibit inelastic flexural behaviour while other brittle deformation mechanisms, such as shear, should remain elastic. The philosophy of the Canadian seismic provisions for flexural walls is based on the assumption that the force reduction factor is applicable to both flexure and shear. If the bending moments are limited because of the flexural strength of a wall, then the shear forces are considered to be limited by the same ratio. Recent case studies have not confirmed this philosophy. Brittle shear failures in walls are still possible even if their shear strengths are established by the Canadian standards. This paper presents an analytical investigation on the shear demand of ductile flexural walls designed for three different seismic zones in Canada. For each zone, an ensemble of code compatible historical earthquake ground motions is identified. The shear demand of each structure, under each earthquake record, is obtained by nonlinear time-history dynamic analyses. In 77% of the cases, the computed dynamic shear demand is higher than the current code shear strength. To address this issue, a force modification factor for shear, different from the one for flexure, is suggested for the Canadian code. Key words: earthquake, seismic response, shear walls.

Analysis of test blanket module attachments under electromagnetic loads by using a dynamic amplification factor envelope

2018 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. 1247-1251
Author(s):  
Raúl Muñoz ◽  
Francisco J. Calvo ◽  
Sergio Sádaba ◽  
Ana M. Gil ◽  
Javier Rodríguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amplification Factor ◽  
Dynamic Amplification Factor ◽  
Dynamic Amplification

scholarly journals A Study on Dynamic Amplification Factor and Structure Parameter of Bridge Deck Pavement Based on Bridge Deck Pavement Roughness

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Fei Han ◽  
Dan-hui Dan ◽  
Hu Wang
Keyword(s):  
Bridge Deck ◽  
Amplification Factor ◽  
Amplification Coefficient ◽  
Dynamic Amplification Factor ◽  
Vibration Load ◽  
Pavement Roughness ◽  
Composite Bridge ◽  
Dynamic Amplification ◽  
Cushion Layer ◽  
Bridge Deck Pavement

In order to study the coupled influence of deck pavement roughness and velocity on dynamic amplification factor, a 2-DOF 1/4 vehicle model is employed to establish the vehicle-bridge-coupled vibration system. The random dynamic load of running vehicle simulated by software MATLAB is applied on bridge deck pavement (BDP) through ANSYS software. Besides, the influence of BDP parameters on control stress under static load and random vibration load is analyzed. The results show that if the surface of BDP is smooth, the dynamic magnification coefficient would first increase and then decrease with increasing of vehicle velocity and reach its maximum value when v = 20 m/s; if the surface of BDP is rough, the maximal and minimum values of the dynamic amplification coefficient (DAC) occur, respectively, when the velocity reaches 10 m/s and 15 m/s. For a composite bridge deck with the cushion layer, the thickness of asphalt pavement should be not too thick or thin and better to be controlled for about 10 cm; with the increasing of cushion layer thickness, the control stress of deck pavement is all decreased and show similar change regularity under effect of different loads. In view of self-weight of structure, the thickness of the cushion layer is recommended to be controlled for about 4 cm.

An Evaluation of Two-Level Seismic Design Procedure

1993 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Ming Uang
Keyword(s):  
Structural Damage ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Design Procedure ◽  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Ultimate Limit State ◽  
Seismic Codes ◽  
Seismic Force ◽  
Force Reduction Factor ◽  
Force Reduction

The two-level design philosophy is recognized by modern seismic codes. When this philosophy is implemented in the code, the intensities of the two design earthquakes, the structural performance criteria, explicit versus implicit design approach, and the effectiveness to achieve the performance criteria vary considerably from one code to the other. For the ultimate limit state, the UBC was compared with seismic codes of Canada, Japan, and Eurocode. It was found that a trend to deviate from the UBC approach of using a single seismic force reduction factor (i.e., Rw) is apparent. Instead, an approach using a compound force reduction factor which considers the contribution of structural ductility and structural overstrength is preferred. For the serviceability limit state, a comparison of the level of design earthquakes and performance criteria of the UBC, Tri-Services Manual, and the Japanese code indicates that the UBC produces the most flexible structure, and that UBC does not control structural damage. It is suggested that the UBC adopts an explicit serviceability design procedure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document