Development of geotechnical limit state design

1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey G. Meyerhof

The historical development of limit state design in geotechnical engineering is reviewed. Total and partial factors of safety used for the design of land–based and offshore structures are compared. It is found that the factors of safety in different codes for the ultimate and serviceability limit states design of earthworks, earth retaining structures, and land-based and offshore foundations are very similar. Partial factors in the ultimate limit state design are linked to the variability of the loads and soil parameters, the design approximations, and construction tolerances. They influence the nominal probability of failure of the type of structure considered and the seriousness of failure, which differ for land-based and offshore structures. These probabilities are compared with human fatality risks of common experiences. The serviceability limit states are governed by structural and operational constraints and the intended service life of the land-based or offshore structure. The corresponding partial factors are generally taken as unity. Key words : codes, earth structures, foundations, human risks, limit states design, probability of failures, factors of safety.

1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Driver ◽  
D. J. Laurie Kennedy

Design standards provide little information for the design of I-shaped steel beams not loaded through the shear centre and therefore subjected to combined flexure and torsion. In particular, methods for determining the ultimate capacity, as is required in limit states design standards, are not presented. The literature on elastic analysis is extensive, but only limited experimental and analytical work has been conducted in the inelastic region. No comprehensive design procedures, applicable to limit states design standards, have been developed.From four tests conducted on cantilever beams, with varying moment–torque ratios, it is established that the torsional behaviour has two distinct phases, with the second dominated by second-order geometric effects. This second phase is nonutilizable because the added torsional restraint developed is path dependent and, if deflections had been restricted, would not have been significant. Based on the first-phase behaviour, a normal and shearing stress distribution on the cross section is proposed. From this, a moment–torque ultimate strength interaction diagram is developed, applicable to a number of different end and loading conditions. This ultimate limit state interaction diagram and serviceability limit states, based on first yield and on distortion limitations, provide a comprehensive design approach for these members. Key words: beams, bending moment, flexure, inelastic, interaction diagram, I-shaped, limit states, serviceability, steel, torsion, torque, ultimate.


1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 815-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
A B Schriver ◽  
A J Valsangkar

Recently, the limit states approach using factored strength has been recommended in geotechnical design. Some recent research has indicated that the application of limit states design using recommended load and strength factors leads to conservative designs compared with the conventional methods. In this study the influence of sheet pile wall geometry, type of water pressure distribution, and different methods of analysis on the maximum bending moment and achor rod force are presented. Recommendations are made to make the factored strength design compatible with conventional design. Key words: factored strength, working stress design, ultimate limit state design, anchored sheet pile wall, bending moment, anchor rod force.


2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (03) ◽  
pp. 135-145
Author(s):  
Jeom Kee Paik

In design of ships and ship-shaped offshore units, issues related to impact pressure actions arising from sloshing, slamming, green water, or explosion are of particular concern. The structural response under impact pressure actions is quite different from that under static or quasistatic actions. It has been recognized that the limit state approach is a more rational basis for structural design and safety assessment where both "demand" (loads) and "capacity" (strength) must be accurately defined. For impact pressure action cases, the demand is associated with hydrodynamics areas, taking into account the characteristics of impact pressure-time history, and the structural capacity is associated with structural mechanics areas, considering geometric and material nonlinearities together with strain rate sensitivity. This paper reviews recent advances and trends toward future limit state design of ships and offshore structures under impact pressure actions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document