Theoretical and experimental conformational preferences of the aldehyde and fluoroaldehyde groups in 2-methylbenzaldehyde, 2-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde, and 4-chloro-2-methylbenzoyl fluoride. Proximate couplings

1980 ◽  
Vol 58 (22) ◽  
pp. 2364-2368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Salman R. Salman ◽  
Timothy A. Wildman
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Benzene Solution ◽  
Energy Difference ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Mo Calculations ◽  
Conformational Preferences ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Anti Form

On the basis of long-range spin–spin coupling constants, the O-syn conformation of 2-methylbenzaldehyde in CCl4 solution at 305 K is favored over the O-anti form by a free energy of 0.53 kJ/mol. This number is compatible with other experiments, as well as with STO-3G MO calculations in which the geometry of the substituents is optimized. The latter yield 0.52 kJ/mol in the internal energy difference. In benzene solution, 2-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde exists in the O-anti form to the extent of at least 95% at 305 K. In CCl4 solution at this temperature, the population of the O-syn conformer of 4-chloro-2-methylbenzoyl fluoride is likely 75% or more of the total, in semiquantitative agreement with STO-3G optimization procedures. Substantial proximate couplings exist between 1H and 19F nuclei in the sidechains of the latter two compounds and are compared with INDO MO FPT computations. These yield negative values for [Formula: see text] in 2-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde, whereas the experimental value is 2.23 Hz.

Motion about the Csp2—S bond in thioanisole and some derivatives by the J method

1986 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 1326-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
James D. Baleja
Keyword(s):  
Gas Phase ◽  
Benzene Solution ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Coupling Constant ◽  
Internal Barrier ◽  
Conformational Preferences ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Component Addition

Conformations about the Csp2—S bond in thioanisole and eight of its derivatives in solution are investigated by means of long-range spin–spin coupling constants over six bonds between the sidechain 13C nucleus and the para ring proton or 19F nucleus. According to geometry optimized STO 3G MO calculations the internal barrier to rotation is predominantly twofold in the gas phase in thioanisole and is 6.2 kJ/mol. In benzene solution the coupling constant yields 5.5(4) kJ/mol. Para fluorine and methyl substituents reduce the magnitude of the internal barrier, but meta methyl or chlorine substituents cause significant increases. In the presence of two ortho fluorine substituents the conformation of lowest energy has the C—S bond in a plane perpendicular to the aromatic plane, but die barrier may now contain a fourfold component. Addition of further fluorine substituents in the meta or para positions causes characteristic changes in conformational preferences of the thiomethyl group.

Concerning the nonexistence of the intramolecular hydrogen bond in 2-nitrothiophenol

1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (21) ◽  
pp. 3732-3735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
William J. E. Parr
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bond ◽  
Free Energy ◽  
Intramolecular Hydrogen Bond ◽  
Energy Difference ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Free Energy Difference ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Intramolecular Hydrogen ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

The long-range spin–spin coupling constants between the sulfhydryl proton and the ring protons in 2-nitrothiophenol in CDCl3 and C6D6 solutions suggest the presence of two conformers in which the S—H bond prefers the benzene plane. The conformer in which the S—H bond lies trans to the nitro group is favoured over the cis conformer by a free energy difference of 0.5 ± 0.2 kcal/mol at 305 K. Apparently any intramolecular hydrogen bond is very weak compared to that in 2-nitrophenol.

A proton magnetie resonance and molecular orbital study of the conformational preferences of the vinylic fragment in some 2-vinylfurans and in 2-vinylthiophene

1976 ◽  
Vol 54 (20) ◽  
pp. 3216-3223 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. E. Parr ◽  
Roderick E. Wasylishen ◽  
Ted Schaefer
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Orbital ◽  
Long Range ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Side Chain ◽  
Orbital Theory ◽  
Molecular Orbital Study ◽  
Conformational Preferences ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

The stereospecific spin–spin coupling constants over five bonds between the α-proton in the side chain and the protons in the heterocycle in 2-vinylfuran, in its β-nitro and β-aldehydic derivatives, and in 2-vinylthiophene are used to demonstrate the preponderance of the s-trans conformers in polar and nonpolar solutions. These conclusions are compared with predictions made by molecular orbital theory at the STO-3G, INDO, CNDO/2, and MINDO/3 levels. Long-range coupling constants between the protons in the side chain and protons in the heterocycle are calculated by CNDO/2 and INDO–MO–FPT and are compared with experiment. It is concluded that the five-bond couplings involving the α-proton are most sensitive to conformation and that they are transmitted mainly via a σ electron mechanism. The other long-range coupling constants are discussed in terms of σ and π electron mechanisms. The STO-3G calculations yield barriers to internal rotation of greater than 4.8 kcal/mol.

NMR spectra, MO calculations of spin-spin coupling constants and conformational analysis of substituted 1,3-dioxolanes

1980 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rois Benassi ◽  
Luisa Schenetti ◽  
Ferdinando Taddei ◽  
Luigi Villa ◽  
Vincenzo Ferri
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Analysis ◽  
Nmr Spectra ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Mo Calculations ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

Long-range spin–spin coupling constants as an indicator of conformational preferences in ethyl and trifluoroethyl vinyl ethers

1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (15) ◽  
pp. 2835-2838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
William J. E. Parr
Keyword(s):  
Vinyl Ether ◽  
Long Range ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Ethyl Vinyl Ether ◽  
Spectroscopic Techniques ◽  
Ethyl Vinyl ◽  
Conformational Preferences ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

The observed and calculated, negative, long-range spin–spin coupling constants over five bonds between olefinic and methylene protons in ethyl vinyl ether and in 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl vinyl ether are consistent with predominant s-cis planar conformations. The five-bond couplings are sensitive to the proximity of the bonds containing the coupled nuclei and are unobservably small in 1-butene where the H,H distances are somewhat larger than in the ethers. The present results concur with the arguments based on other spectroscopic techniques.

scholarly journals Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectrum of 1-Penten-3-yne. INDO and CNDO/2 Molecular Orbital Calculations on Long-Range Spin–Spin Coupling Constants in Enynes

1972 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 1863-1867 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Ernst ◽  
H. M. Hutton ◽  
T. Schaefer
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Orbital ◽  
Long Range ◽  
Benzene Solution ◽  
Parent Compound ◽  
Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectrum ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Molecular Orbital Calculations ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

The high resolution p.m.r. spectra of 1-penten-3-yne in carbon disulfide and in benzene solution are analyzed. Long-range spin–spin coupling constants are discussed in terms of σ and π electron contributions. Comparisons are made with the isomeric 2-methyl-1-buten-3-yne and the parent compound, vinylacetylene. The results of INDO and CNDO/2 molecular orbital calculations are compared to the experimental coupling constants. It is concluded that the π electron contribution to 5J in enyne systems is +0.6 to 0.7 Hz and that σ electron contributions are rather small, the transoid ("pseudo-zig–zag") being larger than the cisoid one. Observed allylic coupling constants in the propene derivative are compared with the calculated values, including those for propene and 2-cyanopropene, available in the literature.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra, Conformations, Spin Coupling Mechanisms, and INDO Molecular Orbital Calculations for the Monofluorobenzaldehydes and some Derivatives

1971 ◽  
Vol 49 (19) ◽  
pp. 3216-3228 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Wasylishen ◽  
T. Schaefer
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Molecular Orbital ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Molecular Orbital Calculations ◽  
Conformational Preferences ◽  
Coupling Parameters ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Spectra

Precise analyses of the proton and some fluorine magnetic resonance spectra in acetone solution are reported for the three monofluorobenzaldehydes as well as for 2-chloro-6-fluorobenzaldehyde and for 4-fluoro-2-nitrobenzaldehyde. The conformational dependence of the coupling parameters allows the measurement of energy differences between the O-cis and O-trans conformations. The energy differences are in better agreement with the INDO predictions than they are with energies derived from i.r. data. Di-pole moments are computed reliably and their measurement is suggested as a good guide to conformational preferences for molecules of this kind. The spin–spin coupling constants between the aldehyde proton and the ring protons and fluorine nuclei are computed for benzaldehyde and the three monofluorobenzaldehydes by the INDO and CNDO molecular orbital approximations. In many instances the agreement between calculated and observed couplings is quantitative.

A proton magnetic resonance estimate of the extent of intramolucular hydrogen bonding in derivatives of 2-trifluoromethyl phenol. Solvent effects

1976 ◽  
Vol 54 (14) ◽  
pp. 2243-2248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
J. Brian Rowbotham
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Hydrogen Bonding ◽  
Vapor Phase ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Hydroxyl Group ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Hydroxyl Protons ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Derivatives Of

The long-range spin–spin coupling constants between hydroxyl protons and ring protons or fluorine nuclei are used to establish the conformer populations in iodine and brornine derivatives of 2-trifluoromethylphenol in C6H12, CCl4, and C6D6 solutions. The sequence Cl, [Formula: see text] is established for the so-called hydrogen bonding preferences of the hydroxyl group in 2,4,6-trisubstituted phenols, the corresponding free energy sequence being −ΔG = 1690, 1690 > 1300 > 1230 > 0 ± 200 cal/mol at 32 °C in CCl4 solution. An indirect estimate of the free energy differences in the vapor phase suggests the sequence −ΔG = 2800, 2800 > 2400 > 2300 > 1100 ± 300 cal/mol; the latter value meaning that the hydroxyl group in 4-bromo-2-trifluoromethylphenol prefers the CF3 group by this amount in the vapor phase. Benzene interacts preferentially with the OH group in this compound to the extent of 1300 cal/mol (ΔG), referenced to the vapor phase.

On the existence of cis and trans conformational isomers in 2-methylphenol and 4-chloro-2-methylphenol

1978 ◽  
Vol 56 (13) ◽  
pp. 1788-1791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Kalvin Chum
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Energy Difference ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Hydroxyl Group ◽  
Trans Form ◽  
Hydroxyl Proton ◽  
Self Association ◽  
Cis And Trans ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

The analysis of the proton magnetic resonance spectra of 2-methylphenol and of 4-chloro-2-methylphenol in benzene-d6 and CCl4 solutions yields spin–spin coupling constants over five bonds between the hydroxyl proton and the meta ring protons. These coupling constants are related to the intramolecular equilibrium between conformers in which the hydroxyl group is oriented cis or trans to the methyl group. The free energy difference between the conformers is 0.4 ± 0.1 kcal/mol, with the trans form being the more stable. The concentration dependence of the hydroxyl proton chemical shift of the chloro compound in CCl4 suggests that dimerization is relatively unimportant and yields rough values for the extent of self-association. It is argued that the derived free energy values refer to the intramolecular equilibrium for the monomers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document