What's Trade Got to Do with It? Relative Demand for Skills within Swedish Manufacturing

Author(s):  
Robert Anderton ◽  
Paul Brenton ◽  
Eva Oscarsson
Keyword(s):  
2002 ◽  
Vol 138 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Anderton ◽  
Paul Brenton ◽  
Eva Oscarsson
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertil C. Lindberg

The author introduces relative demand, defined as the proportion of a country's personal consumption expenditure spent on a good, and describes relative demand as a function of the level of saturation of the good. He compares parameters of these functions among countries and discusses their use in predicting demand.


2008 ◽  
Vol 228 (5-6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Puhani

SummaryI extend a two-skill group model by Katz and Murphy (1992) to estimate relative demand and supply for skills as well as wage rigidity in Germany. Using three data sets for Germany, two for Britain and one for the United States, I simulate the change in relative wage rigidity (wage compression) in all three countries during the early and mid 1990s, this being the period when unemployment increased in Germany but fell in Britain and the US. I show that in this period, Germany experienced wage compression (relative wage rigidity), whereas Britain and the US experienced wage decompression. This evidence is consistent with the Krugman (1994) hypothesis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liran Einav ◽  
Amy Finkelstein ◽  
Heidi Williams

We present a simple graphical framework to illustrate the potential welfare gains from a “top-up” health insurance policy requiring patients to pay the incremental price for more expensive treatment options. We apply this framework to breast cancer treatments, where lumpectomy with radiation therapy is more expensive than mastectomy but generates similar average health benefits. We estimate the relative demand for lumpectomy using variation in distance to the nearest radiation facility, and estimate that the “top-up” policy increases social welfare by $700–2,500 per patient relative to two common alternatives. We briefly discuss additional tradeoffs that arise from an ex ante perspective. (JEL G22, I11, I13, I18)


2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-87
Author(s):  
Michael Ye ◽  
John Zyren ◽  
Joanne Shore

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document