Supply Chain Coordination with a Risk-Averse Retailer and a Combined Buy-Back and Revenue Sharing Contract

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (05) ◽  
pp. 1950028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Zhao ◽  
Shiji Song ◽  
Yuli Zhang ◽  
Jatinder N. D. Gupta ◽  
Anna G. Devlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Numerical Experiments ◽  
Supply Chain Coordination ◽  
Revenue Sharing ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Mild Conditions ◽  
Buy Back

This paper investigates the ability of a combined buy-back (BB) and revenue sharing (RS) contract to improve the efficiency of a supply chain involving a risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer facing stochastic demand. We show that the combined contract can coordinate the supply chain under mild conditions. Further, the effects of risk aversion and contract parameters on the agents’ decision-making are analyzed when the retailer’s risk aversion is modeled by the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) criterion. In contrast to individual BB and RS contracts, the combined contract is able to mitigate the effect of risk-aversion and allow the supplier to obtain higher expected profit. Moreover, situations exist where the combined contract can coordinate the supply chain when neither the BB nor the RS contract can coordinate it. Numerical experiments conducted further confirm the analytical results derived.

SUPPLY CHAIN COORDINATION WITH CVaR CRITERION

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (01) ◽  
pp. 135-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
LEI YANG ◽  
MINGHUI XU ◽  
GANG YU ◽  
HANQIN ZHANG
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Supply Chain Coordination ◽  
Revenue Sharing ◽  
Retail Price ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Mild Conditions ◽  
Quantity Flexibility ◽  
Buy Back

We study the coordination of supply chains with a risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer. Different from the downside risk setting, in a conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) framework, we show that the supply chain can be coordinated with the revenue-sharing, buy-back, two-part tariff and quantity flexibility contracts. Furthermore the revenue-sharing contracts are still equivalent to the buy-back contracts when the retail price is fixed. At the same time, it is shown that the risk-averse retailer of the coordinated supply chain can increase its profit by raising its risk-averse degree under mild conditions.

Coordinating Supply Chain with Buy-Back Contracts in the Presence of Risk Aversion

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (02) ◽  
pp. 1840008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunlin Luo ◽  
Xin Tian ◽  
Xiaobing Mao ◽  
Qiang Cai
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Expected Profit ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Allocation Rule ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Buy Back ◽  
The Impact

This paper addresses the operational decisions and coordination of the supply chain in the presence of risk aversion, where the risk averse retailer’s performance is measured by a combination of the expected profit and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR). Such performance measure reflects the desire of the retailer to maximize the expected profit on one hand and to control the downside risk of the profit on the other hand. The impact of risk aversion on the supply chain’s decision and performance is also explored. To overcome the inefficiency due to the double marginalization and the aggravation resulting from risk aversion, we investigate the buy-back contract to coordinate the supply chain. Such contract can largely increase the supply chain’s profit, especially when the retailer is more risk averse. Lastly, we extend such risk measure to the widely-used business model nowadays — platform selling model, and explore the impact of the allocation rule on the manufacturer’s decision.

scholarly journals Trade Credit and Revenue Sharing of Supply Chain with a Risk-Averse Retailer

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Caiyun Liu ◽  
Kebing Chen ◽  
Mingxia Li ◽  
Haijie Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Trade Credit ◽  
Revenue Sharing ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Optimal Decision ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Credit Period ◽  
Optimal Decisions

In this paper, we develop three supply chain game models, i.e., the basic model, the single trade credit model, and the trade credit and revenue sharing collaboration model. Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) criterion is used as the measure of risk assessment in these models. We analyze the optimal decisions in the centralized and decentralized situations, respectively, and verify that single trade credit cannot coordinate the supply chain. However, the collaboration contract can coordinate the supply chain. Furthermore, this paper explores the influence of risk-aversion factor, trade credit period, revenue sharing coefficient, and other parameters on the optimal decisions and studies the feasible range of Pareto improvement in the collaborative model. In numerical experiments, the results show that the decisions and profits of both the manufacturer and the retailer reply on the degree of the risk aversion, the trade credit period, and the revenue sharing coefficient. The collaborative contract effectively improves supply chain performance and achieves a ‘win-win’ situation for the supply chain members. In addition, we also consider two extensions for our research. One extension shows that the collaborative contract of trade credit and buyback can also coordinate the supply chain in a certain range. The other extension considers the optimal decision of a risk-averse manufacturer with CVaR.

Coordinating Vulnerable Supply Chains with Option Contracts

2021 ◽  
pp. 2050053
Author(s):  
Zhongyi Liu ◽  
Shengya Hua ◽  
Guanying Wang
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Supply Chain Coordination ◽  
Wholesale Price ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Option Contract ◽  
Risk Neutral ◽  
Disruption Risk

We investigate vulnerable supply chain coordination with an option contract in the presence of supply chain disruption risk caused by external and internal disturbances. The supply chain consists of a single risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer. We characterize the retailer’s order quantity decision under the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) criterion and the supplier’s production decision. The results show that facing disruption risk and risk-aversion, both the retailer and the supplier would be more prudent to order and produce less than the risk-neutral scenario, inducing damage to the supply chain performance. The number of options purchased is decreasing in disruption risk and the risk-aversion of the retailer. The supplier will increase production as the disruption risk decreases or the shortage penalty increases. When the supplier does not know the risk-aversion of the retailer, the former will produce more and bear a higher overstock risk. We also investigate conditions that facilitate vulnerable supply chain coordination and find that the existence of risk-aversion and disruption risk restrict the option price and exercise price to lower price levels. Finally, we compare the option contract with wholesale price contract from the supplier’s and retailer’s perspectives through a numerical study.

scholarly journals Emergency Quantity Discount Contract with Suppliers Risk Aversion under Stochastic Price

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (15) ◽  
pp. 1791
Author(s):  
Shuangsheng Wu ◽  
Qi Li
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Risk Measure ◽  
Supply Chain Coordination ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Step Size ◽  
Quantity Discount ◽  
Related Factors

This paper constructs an emergency quantity discount contract to explore the inherent law of the contract coordinating the supply chain with stochastic market demand and price and the risk-averse supplier. Meanwhile, the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) risk measure criterion is revised to study the influence of supplier’s risk aversion attitude on supply chain coordination. The results show that supplier risk aversion will cause the bifurcation of the relevant factors in the supply chain under the stochastic price. Within the bifurcation region, the supply chain cannot be coordinated; out of the bifurcation region, the supply chain can achieve coordination. The supply chain related factors’ variation range in the bifurcation region is related to the step size of the risk aversion factor and the normal distribution function’s variance of the market demand, and it increases with the latter.

scholarly journals Supply Chain Coordination with a Risk-Averse Retailer and the Call Option Contract in the Presence of a Service Requirement

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 787
Author(s):  
Han Zhao ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
Shiji Song ◽  
Yu Liao
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Supply Chain ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Call Option ◽  
Service Requirement ◽  
Option Contract ◽  
The Impact

This paper investigates a supply chain consisting of a single risk-neutral supplier and a single risk-averse retailer with the call option contract and a service requirement, where the retailer’s objective is to maximize the Conditional Value-at-Risk about profit. The optimal ordering quantity of the retailer and the optimal production quantity of the supplier are derived with the call option contract in the presence of a service requirement. Furthermore, by investigating the effect of the service level and the risk aversion on the supply chain, it is found that the retailer’s optimal Conditional Value-at-Risk is non-increasing in the service requirement and increasing in the risk aversion, while the supplier’s optimal expected profit is non-decreasing in the service and decreasing in the risk aversion. In addition, this paper demonstrates the impact of contract parameters on the service-constrained supply chain, and finds that the retailer’s optimal Conditional Value-at-Risk may be increasing, constant or decreasing in unit exercise price. Finally, with the call option contract, a distribution-free coordination condition is derived to achieve the Pareto improvement under Conditional Value-at-Risk criterion in the presence of a service requirement.

scholarly journals Supply Chain Coordination with a Loss-Averse Retailer and Combined Contract

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 586
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Shiji Song ◽  
Ying Qiao ◽  
Han Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Loss Aversion ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Supply Chain Coordination ◽  
Wholesale Price ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Optimal Order ◽  
Confidence Levels ◽  
Quantity Flexibility ◽  
Quantity Flexibility Contract

This paper studies the supply chain coordination where the retailer is loss-averse, and a combined buyback and quantity flexibility contract is introduced. The loss-averse retailer’s objective is to maximize the Conditional Value-at-Risk of utility. It is shown the combined contract can coordinate the chain and a unique coordinating wholesale price exists if the confidence level is below a threshold. Moreover, the retailer’s optimal order quantity, expected utility and coordinating wholesale price are decreasing in loss aversion and confidence levels, respectively. We also find that when the contract parameters are restricted, the combined contract may coordinate the supply chain even though neither of its component contracts coordinate the chain.

scholarly journals Optimal Decisions of a Supply Chain with Two Risk-Averse and Competing Retailers under Random Demand

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Shuang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Stackelberg Games ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Demand Model ◽  
Retail Competition ◽  
Decentralized Supply Chain ◽  
Optimal Decisions ◽  
Channel Efficiency

This paper investigates the optimal decisions in a decentralized supply chain consisting of one manufacturer and two competing retailers who face price-sensitive and stochastic demand. The retailers are risk averse with conditional value at risk (CVaR) as their risk measure, and the manufacturer is a risk-neutral agent. We construct manufacturer-Stackelberg games with retailers, who engage in horizontal price competition. For the multiplicative demand model and expected demand as an exponential function of both prices, we show that there exists the optimal pricing-ordering joint decision uniquely. We then explore the influence of the price sensitivity, risk aversion, and retail competition on optimal decisions and channel efficiency. The results show that retail competition contributes to manufacturer and improves channel efficiency of the decentralized supply chain. When the retailers are more risk averse, the channel efficiency becomes much lower. However, the level of retailers’ risk aversion has no significant impact on the manufacturer’s optimal wholesale price and retailer’s optimal selling price.

scholarly journals Coordinating Contracts for Two-Stage Fashion Supply Chain with Risk-Averse Retailer and Price-Dependent Demand

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minli Xu ◽  
Qiao Wang ◽  
Linhan Ouyang
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Supply Chain Coordination ◽  
Revenue Sharing ◽  
Channel Coordination ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Revenue Sharing Contract ◽  
Risk Neutral ◽  
Mean Variance ◽  
Variance Approach ◽  
Dependent Demand

When the demand is sensitive to retail price, revenue sharing contract and two-part tariff contract have been shown to be able to coordinate supply chains with risk neutral agents. We extend the previous studies to consider a risk-averse retailer in a two-echelon fashion supply chain. Based on the classic mean-variance approach in finance, the issue of channel coordination in a fashion supply chain with risk-averse retailer and price-dependent demand is investigated. We propose both single contracts and joint contracts to achieve supply chain coordination. We find that the coordinating revenue sharing contract and two-part tariff contract in the supply chain with risk neutral agents are still useful to coordinate the supply chain taking into account the degree of risk aversion of fashion retailer, whereas a more complex sales rebate and penalty (SRP) contract fails to do so. When using combined contracts to coordinate the supply chain, we demonstrate that only revenue sharing with two-part tariff contract can coordinate the fashion supply chain. The optimal conditions for contract parameters to achieve channel coordination are determined. Numerical analysis is presented to supplement the results and more insights are gained.

scholarly journals Optimal Decision of Deferred Payment Supply Chain considering Bilateral Risk-Aversion Degree

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Liang ◽  
Li Futou
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Wholesale Price ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Optimal Order ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Order Quantity ◽  
Initial Capital ◽  
Optimal Order Quantity ◽  
Degree Of Risk

This paper aims to fill up the gap that the previous research has never explored, the deferred payment supply chain with a risk-averse supplier. To this end, the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) was adopted as a criterion to measure the influence of retailer’s deferred payment on supply chain performance. According to this criterion, the retailer’s optimal order quantity and the supplier’s optimal wholesale price per unit product were investigated under decentralized decision-making. Then, the existence of a unique optimal strategy was discussed for risk-averse supplier and retailer, and the values of risk-averse, initial capital, and wholesale price were calculated in detail. Finally, the theoretical results were testified through a numerical example. It is concluded that retailer’s optimal order quantity is negatively correlated with the wholesale price, initial capital, and degree of risk aversion, so that the retailer can benefit through proper risk aversion; the supplier’s expected profit decreases with the increase in the degree of risk aversion, yet the optimal wholesale price is determined by the degree of risk aversion of supplier and retailer. The research findings shed valuable new light on how to manage a supply chain involving risk-averse supplier and retailer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document