A FAMILY OF MODELS EXPLAINING THE LEVEL-SLOPE-CURVATURE EFFECT

2003 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 239-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
LILIANA FORZANI ◽  
CARLOS TOLMASKY

One of the most widely used methods to build yield curve models is to use principal components analysis on the correlation matrix of the innovations. R. Litterman and J. Scheinkman found that three factors are enough to explain most of the moves in the case of the US treasury curve. These factors are level, steepness and curvature. Working in the context of commodity futures, G. Cortazar and E. Schwartz found that the spectral structure of the correlation matrices is strikingly similar to those found by R. Litterman and J. Scheinkman. We observe that in both cases the correlation between two different contracts maturing at times t and s is roughly of the form ρ|t-s|, for a certain (fixed) 0 ≤ ρ ≤ 1. Assuming this correlation structure we prove that the observed factors are perturbations of cosine waves and we extend the analysis to multiple curves.

2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (08) ◽  
pp. 1201-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
LILIANA FORZANI ◽  
CARLOS F. TOLMASKY

One of the most widely used methods to build yield curve models is to use principal components analysis on the correlation matrix of the innovations. R. Litterman and J. Scheinkman found that three factors are enough to explain most of the moves in the case of the US treasury curve. These factors are level, steepness and curvature. Working in the context of commodity futures, G. Cortazar and E. Schwartz found that the spectral structure of the correlation matrices is strikingly similar to those found by R. Litterman and J. Scheinkman. We observe that in both cases the correlation between two different contracts maturing at times t and s is roughly of the form ρ|t-s|, for a certain (fixed) 0≤ρ≤1. Assuming this correlation structure we prove that the observed factors are perturbations of cosine waves.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime González Maiz Jiménez ◽  
Adán Reyes Santiago

This research measures the systematic risk of 10 sectors in the American Stock Market, discerning the COVID-19 pandemic period. The novelty of this study is the use of the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) technique to measure the systematic risk of each sector, selecting five stocks per sector with the greatest market capitalization. The results show that the sectors that have the greatest increase in exposure to systematic risk during the pandemic are restaurants, clothing, and insurance, whereas the sectors that show the greatest decrease in terms of exposure to systematic risk are automakers and tobacco. Due to the results of this study, it seems advisable for practitioners to select stocks that belong to either the automakers or tobacco sector to get protection from health crises, such as COVID-19.


2000 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Campbell ◽  
Shawn T. Prichard

The present study examined the underlying structure of the College Adjustment Scales via principal components analysis. A correlation matrix of the nine subscales showed significant multicolinearity. A subsequent principal components analysis demonstrated that one factor accounted for 57% of the total variance and that the majority of subscales were moderately correlated with this single factor. The results suggest that the College Adjustment Scales may measure the same underlying construct and that the clinical distinctions implied by subscale scores should be regarded with caution. Conclusions are constrained by sample size and demographic characteristics, but the results suggest the need for further empirical validation of the College Adjustment Scales, which may be useful in college counseling centers.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching‐I Pao ◽  
Michael Rybak ◽  
Maya Sternberg ◽  
Namanjeet Ahluwalia ◽  
Christine Pfeiffer

1997 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwenolé Loas ◽  
Didier Fremaux ◽  
Patrice Boyer

The aim was to examine the relationship between alexithymia, anhedonia, and capacity for displeasure in a group of 133 healthy subjects using principal components analysis. A correlation matrix comprised of items from both the Communication and Identification scale of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale and the Physical Pleasure-Displeasure Scale yielded a four-factor solution (one Communication-Identification, two Pleasure, and one Displeasure factor) with no overlap of the significant factor loadings for the items from each scale. Moreover, there were no positive significant correlations between the Communication and Identification Scales and the Physical Anhedonia Scale. Our findings support the view that physical anhedonia is a construct distinct and separate from alexithymia.


1973 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elbert W. Russell

A recent study by Russell did not duplicate Halstead's factors of biological intelligence. As an approach to understanding this finding, Hal-stead's original correlation matrix was subjected to the same orthogonal principal components analysis used in Russell's study as well as an orthogonal and an oblique factor analysis using communalities. All of Halstead's factors appeared in these analyses. The failure to duplicate Halstead's work was evidently not due to use of different factoring methods. In a second analysis which reduced the number of Halstead's variables to the number used by Russell, one of Halstead's factors (P) did not appear. This factor represented tests measuring the visual threshold, and so it appears to be primarily a perceptual factor.


Methodology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Raîche ◽  
Theodore A. Walls ◽  
David Magis ◽  
Martin Riopel ◽  
Jean-Guy Blais

Most of the strategies that have been proposed to determine the number of components that account for the most variation in a principal components analysis of a correlation matrix rely on the analysis of the eigenvalues and on numerical solutions. The Cattell’s scree test is a graphical strategy with a nonnumerical solution to determine the number of components to retain. Like Kaiser’s rule, this test is one of the most frequently used strategies for determining the number of components to retain. However, the graphical nature of the scree test does not definitively establish the number of components to retain. To circumvent this issue, some numerical solutions are proposed, one in the spirit of Cattell’s work and dealing with the scree part of the eigenvalues plot, and one focusing on the elbow part of this plot. A simulation study compares the efficiency of these solutions to those of other previously proposed methods. Extensions to factor analysis are possible and may be particularly useful with many low-dimensional components.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document