GENERALLY t-LINKATIVE DOMAINS

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 1250027
Author(s):  
THOMAS G. LUCAS
Keyword(s):  
Finite Type ◽  
Maximal Ideal ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Type System ◽  
Nonzero Ideal ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Finitely Generated ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Valuation Domains ◽  
Prüfer Domains

An overring t of an integral domain R is t-linked over R if for each finitely generated nonzero ideal I of R, (T : IT) ⊋ T implies (R : I) ⊋ R. A t-linkative domain is one for which each overring is t-linked. The notion of a generally t-linkative domain is introduced as a domain R such that [Formula: see text] is t-linkative for each finite type system of ideals [Formula: see text]. In general, R is generally t-linkative if and only if RM is generally t-linkative for each maximal ideal M. All Prüfer domains are generally t-linkative as are all one-dimensional domains and all pseudo-valuation domains. If R is Noetherian and not a field, then it is generally t-linkative if and only if it is one-dimensional. In contrast, an example is given of a two-dimensional Mori domain that is generally t-linkative.

VALUATIVE DOMAINS

2010 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 43-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAUL-JEAN CAHEN ◽  
DAVID E. DOBBS ◽  
THOMAS G. LUCAS
Keyword(s):  
Maximal Ideal ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Nonzero Element ◽  
Prime Ideals ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Prüfer Domain ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Maximal Ideals ◽  
Valuation Domains ◽  
Integrally Closed

A (commutative integral) domain R is said to be valuative if, for each nonzero element u in the quotient field of R, at least one of R ⊆ R[u] and R ⊆ R[u-1] has no proper intermediate rings. Such domains are closely related to valuation domains. If R is a valuative domain, then R has at most three maximal ideals, and at most two if R is not integrally closed. Also, if R is valuative, the set of nonmaximal prime ideals of R is linearly ordered, at most one maximal ideal of R does not contain each nonmaximal prime of R, and RP is a valuation domain for each prime P except for at most one maximal ideal. Any integrally closed valuative domain is a Bézout domain. Valuation domains are characterized as the quasilocal integrally closed valuative domains. Each one-dimensional Prüfer domain with at most three maximal ideals is valuative.

scholarly journals On 2-absorbing ideals of commutative rings

2007 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman Badawi
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ideal ◽  
Maximal Ideal ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Commutative Rings ◽  
Dedekind Domain ◽  
Proper Ideal ◽  
Prime Ideals ◽  
Maximal Ideals ◽  
Noetherian Domain ◽  
Valuation Domains

Suppose that R is a commutative ring with 1 ≠ 0. In this paper, we introduce the concept of 2-absorbing ideal which is a generalisation of prime ideal. A nonzero proper ideal I of R is called a 2-absorbing ideal of R if whenever a, b, c ∈ R and abc ∈ I, then ab ∈ I or ac ∈ I or bc ∈ I. It is shown that a nonzero proper ideal I of R is a 2-absorbing ideal if and only if whenever I1I2I3 ⊆ I for some ideals I1,I2,I3 of R, then I1I2 ⊆ I or I2I3 ⊆ I or I1I3 ⊆ I. It is shown that if I is a 2-absorbing ideal of R, then either Rad(I) is a prime ideal of R or Rad(I) = P1 ⋂ P2 where P1,P2 are the only distinct prime ideals of R that are minimal over I. Rings with the property that every nonzero proper ideal is a 2-absorbing ideal are characterised. All 2-absorbing ideals of valuation domains and Prüfer domains are completely described. It is shown that a Noetherian domain R is a Dedekind domain if and only if a 2-absorbing ideal of R is either a maximal ideal of R or M2 for some maximal ideal M of R or M1M2 where M1,M2 are some maximal ideals of R. If RM is Noetherian for each maximal ideal M of R, then it is shown that an integral domain R is an almost Dedekind domain if and only if a 2-absorbing ideal of R is either a maximal ideal of R or M2 for some maximal ideal M of R or M1M2 where M1,M2 are some maximal ideals of R.

scholarly journals Projective subdynamics and universal shifts

2011 ◽  
Vol DMTCS Proceedings vol. AP,... (Proceedings) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Guillon
Keyword(s):  
Large Class ◽  
Finite Type ◽  
Positive Entropy ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
International Audience

International audience We study the projective subdynamics of two-dimensional shifts of finite type, which is the set of one-dimensional configurations that appear as columns in them. We prove that a large class of one-dimensional shifts can be obtained as such, namely the effective subshifts which contain positive-entropy sofic subshifts. The proof involves some simple notions of simulation that may be of interest for other constructions. As an example, it allows us to prove the undecidability of all non-trivial properties of projective subdynamics.

On t- Spec(R[[X]])

1995 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Dobbs ◽  
Evan G. Houston
Keyword(s):  
Maximal Ideal ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Valuation Domain ◽  
Finitely Generated ◽  
Finite Dimensional ◽  
Star Operation

AbstractLet D be an integral domain, and let X be an analytic indeterminate. As usual, if I is an ideal of D, set It = ∪{JV = (J-1)-1 | J is a nonzero finitely generated subideal of I}; this defines the t-operation, a particularly useful star-operation on D. We discuss the t-operation on R[[X]], paying particular attention to the relation between t- dim(R) and t- dim(R[[X]]). We show that if P is a t-prime of R, then P[[X]] contains a t-prime which contracts to P in R, and we note that this does not quite suffice to show that t- dim(R[[X]]) ≥ t- dim(R) in general. If R is Noetherian, it is easy to see that t- dim(R[[X]]) ≥ t- dim(R), and we show that we have equality in the case of t-dimension 1. We also observe that if V is a valuation domain, then t-dim(V[[X]]) ≥ t- dim(V), and we give examples to show that the inequality can be strict. Finally, we prove that if V is a finite-dimensional valuation domain with maximal ideal M, then MV[[X]] is a maximal t-ideal of V[[X]].

scholarly journals Note on Colon-Multiplication Domains

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mimouni
Keyword(s):  
Maximal Ideal ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Nonzero Ideal ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Integral Domains ◽  
Fractional Ideal ◽  
Multiplication Ideal

LetRbe an integral domain with quotient fieldL.Call a nonzero (fractional) idealAofRa colon-multiplication ideal any idealA, such thatB(A:B)=Afor every nonzero (fractional) idealBofR.In this note, we characterize integral domains for which every maximal ideal (resp., every nonzero ideal) is a colon-multiplication ideal. It turns that this notion unifies Dedekind andMTPdomains.

ALMOST PERFECT LOCAL DOMAINS AND THEIR DOMINATING ARCHIMEDEAN VALUATION DOMAINS

2002 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 451-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAOLO ZANARDO
Keyword(s):  
Commutative Ring ◽  
Maximal Ideal ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Nonzero Ideal ◽  
Valuation Domain ◽  
Local Domain ◽  
Valuation Domains ◽  
Domain V

A commutative ring R is said to be almost perfect if R/I is perfect for every nonzero ideal I of R. We prove that an almost perfect local domain R is dominated by a unique archimedean valuation domain V of its field of quotients Q if and only if the integral closure of R contains an ideal of V. We show how to construct almost perfect local domains dominated by finitely many archimedean valuation domains. We provide several examples illustrating various possible situations. In particular, we construct an almost perfect local domain whose maximal ideal is not almost nilpotent.

scholarly journals Topologically completely positive entropy and zero-dimensional topologically completely positive entropy

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1894-1922
Author(s):  
RONNIE PAVLOV
Keyword(s):  
Finite Type ◽  
Sufficient Condition ◽  
Positive Entropy ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Completely Positive ◽  
Shift Of Finite Type ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Zero Entropy ◽  
The Difference

In a previous paper [Pavlov, A characterization of topologically completely positive entropy for shifts of finite type. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.34 (2014), 2054–2065], the author gave a characterization for when a $\mathbb{Z}^{d}$-shift of finite type has no non-trivial subshift factors with zero entropy, a property which we here call zero-dimensional topologically completely positive entropy. In this work, we study the difference between this notion and the more classical topologically completely positive entropy of Blanchard. We show that there are one-dimensional subshifts and two-dimensional shifts of finite type which have zero-dimensional topologically completely positive entropy but not topologically completely positive entropy. In addition, we show that strengthening the hypotheses of the main result of Pavlov [A characterization of topologically completely positive entropy for shifts of finite type. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.34 (2014), 2054–2065] yields a sufficient condition for a $\mathbb{Z}^{d}$-shift of finite type to have topologically completely positive entropy.

ON MAXIMAL NON-ACCP SUBRINGS

2007 ◽  
Vol 06 (05) ◽  
pp. 873-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
AHMED AYACHE ◽  
DAVID E. DOBBS ◽  
OTHMAN ECHI
Keyword(s):  
Nonzero Ideal ◽  
Valuation Domain ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Ring Extension ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Minimal Ring Extension

A domain R is a maximal non-ACCP subring of its quotient field if and only if R is either a two-dimensional valuation domain with a DVR overring or a one-dimensional nondiscrete valuation domain. If R ⊂ S is a minimal ring extension and S is a domain, then (R,S) is a residually algebraic pair. If S is a domain but not a field, a maximal non-ACCP subring extension R ⊂ S is a minimal ring extension if (R,S) is a residually algebraic pair and R is quasilocal. Results with a similar flavor are given for domains R ⊂ S sharing a nonzero ideal, with applications to rings R of the form A + XB[X] or A + XB[[X]]. If R ⊂ S is a minimal ring extension such that R is a domain and S is not (R-algebra isomorphic to) an overring of R, then R satisfies ACCP if and only if S satisfies ACCP.

Projective Ideals of Finite Type

1969 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 1057-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
William W. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ideal ◽  
Commutative Ring ◽  
Finite Type ◽  
Local Ring ◽  
Maximal Ideal ◽  
Quotient Ring ◽  
Finitely Generated ◽  
Unique Maximal Ideal

The main results in this paper relate the concepts of flatness and projectiveness for finitely generated ideals in a commutative ring with unity. In this discussion the idea of a multiplicative ideal is used.Definition.An ideal Jis multiplicative if and only if whenever I is an ideal with I ⊂ J there exists an ideal Csuch that I = JC.Throughout this paper Rwill denote a commutative ring with unity. If I and Jare ideals of R,then I: J = {x| xJ ⊂ I}. By “prime ideal” we will mean “proper prime ideal” and Specie will denote this set of ideals. Ris called a local ring if it has a unique maximal ideal (the ring need not be Noetherian). If P is in Spec R then RPis the quotient ring formed using the complement of P.

On the Criteria of D.D. Anderson for Invertible and Flat Ideals

1986 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Dobbs
Keyword(s):  
Principal Ideal ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Nonzero Ideal ◽  
Finitely Generated ◽  
Integral Domains ◽  
Maximal Ideals ◽  
Dedekind Domains ◽  
Principal Ideal Domains ◽  
Bezout Domains ◽  
Torsion Free

AbstractLet R be an integral domain. It is proved that if a nonzero ideal I of R can be generated by n < ∞ elements, then I is invertible (i.e., flat) if and only if I(∩ Rai) = ∩ Iai for all { a1, . . ., a n﹜ ⊂ I. The article's main focus is on torsion-free R-modules E which are LCM-stable in the sense that E(Ra ∩ Rb) = Ea ∩ Eb for all a, b ∈ R. By means of linear relations, LCM-stableness is shown to be equivalent to a weak aspect of flatness. Consequently, if each finitely generated ideal of R may be 2-generated, then each LCM-stable R-module is flat. Finally, LCM-stableness of maximal ideals serves to characterize Prüfer domains, Dedekind domains, principal ideal domains, and Bézout domains amongst suitably larger classes of integral domains.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document