On 3-connected es-splitting binary matroids

2016 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 1650017 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. B. Dhotre ◽  
P. P. Malavadkar ◽  
M. M. Shikare

The es-splitting operation on a [Formula: see text]-connected binary matroid may not preserve the [Formula: see text]-connectedness of the matroid. In this paper, we provide a sufficient condition for a [Formula: see text]-connected binary matroid to yield a [Formula: see text]-connected binary matroid under the es-splitting operation. We derive a splitting lemma for [Formula: see text]-connected binary matroids as an application of this result.

2014 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 1450060
Author(s):  
P. P. Malavadkar ◽  
M. M. Shikare ◽  
S. B. Dhotre

The splitting operation on an n-connected binary matroid may not yield an n-connected binary matroid. In this paper, we characterize n-connected binary matroids which yield n-connected binary matroids by the generalized splitting operation.


10.37236/6911 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. R. Kingan

Regular matroids are binary matroids with no minors isomorphic to the Fano matroid $F_7$ or its dual $F_7^*$. Seymour proved that 3-connected regular matroids are either graphs, cographs, or $R_{10}$, or else can be decomposed along a non-minimal exact 3-separation induced by $R_{12}$. Quasiregular matroids are binary matroids with no minor isomorphic to the self-dual binary matroid $E_4$. The class of quasiregular matroids properly contains the class of regular matroids. We prove that 3-connected quasiregular matroids are either graphs, cographs, or deletion-minors of $PG(3,2)$, $R_{17}$ or $M_{12}$ or else can be decomposed along a non-minimal exact 3-separation induced by $R_{12}$, $P_9$, or $P_9^*$.


1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
HAIDONG WU

A cocircuit C* in a matroid M is said to be non-separating if and only if M[setmn ]C*, the deletion of C* from M, is connected. A vertex-triad in a matroid is a three-element non-separating cocircuit. Non-separating cocircuits in binary matroids correspond to vertices in graphs. Let C be a circuit of a 3-connected binary matroid M such that [mid ]E(M)[mid ][ges ]4 and, for all elements x of C, the deletion of x from M is not 3-connected. We prove that C meets at least two vertex-triads of M. This gives direct binary matroid generalizations of certain graph results of Halin, Lemos, and Mader. For binary matroids, it also generalizes a result of Oxley. We also prove that a minimally 3-connected binary matroid M which has at least four elements has at least ½r*(M)+1 vertex-triads, where r*(M) is the corank of the matroid M. An immediate consequence of this result is the following result of Halin: a minimally 3-connected graph with n vertices has at least 2n+6/5 vertices of degree three. We also generalize Tutte's Triangle Lemma for general matroids.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Naiyer Pirouz ◽  
Maruti Mukinda Shikare

We obtain some results concerning the planarity and graphicness of the splitting matroids. Further, we explore the effect of splitting operation on the sum of two matroids.


2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-308
Author(s):  
JOSEPH E. BONIN

We prove that if an involution ϕ is an automorphism of a connected binary matroid M then there is a hyperplane of M that is invariant under ϕ. We also consider extensions of this result for higher connectivity.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dillon Mayhew ◽  
G Royle ◽  
Geoffrey Whittle

© 2017 Elsevier Inc. We consider some applications of our characterisation of the internally 4-connected binary matroids with no M(K3,3)-minor. We characterise the internally 4-connected binary matroids with no minor in M, where M is a subset of {M(K3,3),M⁎(K3,3),M(K5),M⁎(K5)} that contains either M(K3,3) or M⁎(K3,3). We also describe a practical algorithm for testing whether a binary matroid has a minor in M. In addition we characterise the growth-rate of binary matroids with no M(K3,3)-minor, and we show that a binary matroid with no M(K3,3)-minor has critical exponent over GF(2) at most equal to four.


1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 539-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
LUIS A. GODDYN ◽  
BILL JACKSON

We show that, if M is a connected binary matroid of cogirth at least five which does not have both an F7-minor and an F*7-minor, then M has a circuit C such that M − C is connected and r(M − C) = r(M).


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Nelson ◽  
Luke Postle ◽  
Tom Kelly ◽  
Frantisek Kardos ◽  
Marthe Bonamy

A well-known conjecture of András Gyárfás and David Sumner states that for every positive integer m and every finite tree T there exists k such that all graphs that do not contain the clique Km or an induced copy of T have chromatic number at most k. The conjecture has been proved in many special cases, but the general case has been open for several decades. The main purpose of this paper is to consider a natural analogue of the conjecture for matroids, where it turns out, interestingly, to be false. Matroids are structures that result from abstracting the notion of independent sets in vector spaces: that is, a matroid is a set M together with a nonempty hereditary collection I of subsets deemed to be independent where all maximal independent subsets of every set are equicardinal. They can also be regarded as generalizations of graphs, since if G is any graph and I is the collection of all acyclic subsets of E(G), then the pair (E(G),I) is a matroid. In fact, it is a binary matroid, which means that it can be represented as a subset of a vector space over F2. To do this, we take the space of all formal sums of vertices and represent the edge vw by the sum v+w. A set of edges is easily seen to be acyclic if and only if the corresponding set of sums is linearly independent. There is a natural analogue of an induced subgraph for matroids: an induced restriction of a matroid M is a subset M′ of M with the property that adding any element of M−M′ to M′ produces a matroid with a larger independent set than M′. The natural analogue of a tree with m edges is the matroid Im, where one takes a set of size m and takes all its subsets to be independent. (Note, however, that unlike with graph-theoretic trees there is just one such matroid up to isomorphism for each m.) Every graph can be obtained by deleting edges from a complete graph. Analogously, every binary matroid can be obtained by deleting elements from a finite binary projective geometry, that is, the set of all one-dimensional subspaces in a finite-dimensional vector space over F2. Finally, the analogue of the chromatic number for binary matroids is a quantity known as the critical number introduced by Crapo and Rota, which in the case of a graph G turns out to be ⌈log2(χ(G))⌉ -- that is, roughly the logarithm of its chromatic number. One of the results of the paper is that a binary matroid can fail to contain I3 or the Fano plane F7 (which is the simplest projective geometry) as an induced restriction, but also have arbitrarily large critical number. By contrast, the critical number is at most two if one also excludes the matroid associated with K5 as an induced restriction. The main result of the paper is a structural description of all simple binary matroids that have neither I3 nor F7 as an induced restriction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document