Results of the Volar Approach in Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 26-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott F. M. Duncan ◽  
Anthony A. Smith ◽  
Kevin J. Renfree ◽  
Ross M. Dunbar ◽  
Marianne V. Merritt
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Joint Destruction ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Posttraumatic Arthritis ◽  
Dorsal Approach ◽  
Volar Approach ◽  
Pip Joint

Background: Most hand surgeons use a dorsal approach for proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint implant arthroplasty. However, a volar approach offers the advantage of no disturbance to the extensor mechanism, thus allowing early initiation of active range of motion. We examined our results in patients who underwent PIP joint arthroplasty via a volar approach. Methods: Using a retrospective chart review, we evaluated the outcomes of patients undergoing PIP joint arthroplasty through a volar approach between 2001 and 2005 by 3 fellowship-trained hand surgeons at our institution. The indication for surgery was PIP joint pain with radiographic evidence of joint destruction. Variables included implant type, diagnosis, affected digit(s), preoperative and postoperative range of motion, and complications. Hand therapy was initiated on postoperative day 3 or 4. Results: Over the 5 years, 25 PIP joints were replaced in 18 women and 2 men with the volar approach. Replacements consisted of 14 surface replacement prostheses, 9 pyrocarbon prostheses, and 2 silicone prostheses. The average age of patients at prosthesis implantation was 64 years (range, 39–75 years). Prostheses were placed in 1 index, 12 long, 7 ring, and 5 small digits. Average follow-up period was 33 months (range, 24–69 months). Preoperative diagnoses were osteoarthritis (14), rheumatoid arthritis (4), and posttraumatic arthritis (2). Preoperative total arc of motion averaged 42° (range, 0° extension to 80° flexion); postoperative total arc of motion averaged 56° (range, –10° extension to 90° flexion). Complications comprised 1 swan neck deformity, 1 deep infection, 1 dislocation (early), and 2 loose implants with flexion contractures. Seventeen patients had minimal or no pain at their last follow-up visit. Conclusions: PIP joint arthroplasty can be successfully implemented through a volar approach with various implant types and has outcomes similiar to the published results of the dorsal approach.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Surface Replacement Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty Through a Volar Approach: A Prospective Study

Hand ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Trumble ◽  
Dennis J. Heaton
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Extensor Mechanism ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Surface Replacement ◽  
Dorsal Approach ◽  
Volar Approach ◽  
Pip Joint ◽  
Central Slip

Background: The dorsal approach to the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint provides the advantage of improved visualization of the articular surface, while the disadvantage of a dorsal approach is the disruption of the central slip and extensor mechanism requiring a delay in range of motion exercises. A volar approach keeps the central slip and extensor mechanism intact, allowing for early range of motion. The goal of this study was to evaluate patient outcomes of surface replacement (SR) PIP joint arthroplasty performed through a volar approach. Methods: Twenty-one patients were evaluated with primary osteoarthritis of a single PIP joint and underwent SR arthroplasty using the Stryker SR PIP joint implants. Patients included in this study were exclusively treated through a volar approach. Preoperative range of motion, coronal plan deformity, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and patient satisfaction were measured and compared with postoperative measurements using a paired Student t test. Results: The average length of follow-up was 34 months (± 9 months). Postoperative arc of motion for the PIP and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints measured 87° (±12°) and 36° (±11°), respectively. The average improvement in PIP arc of motion was 58°, DASH score measured 14 (±5), satisfaction measured 4 (±1), and coronal plane deviation measured 2° (±2°). No evidence of implant subsidence was found on postoperative radiographs. Four patients required an extensor tendon tenolysis, and 1 patient suffered a superficial surgical site infection. Conclusion: SR arthroplasty, when performed through a volar approach, allows for early range of motion and greater improvements in arc of motion, DASH score, and patient satisfaction.

The extensor tendon splitting approach to the proximal interphalangeal joint: do we need to reinsert the central slip?

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Afifi ◽  
A. Richards ◽  
A. Medoro ◽  
D. Mercer ◽  
M. Moneim
Keyword(s):  
Extensor Tendon ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Middle Phalanx ◽  
Dorsal Approach ◽  
Pip Joint ◽  
Central Slip ◽  
Extensor Lag

Current approaches to the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint have potential complications and limitations. We present a dorsal approach that involves splitting the extensor tendon in the midline, detaching the insertion of the central slip and repairing the extensor tendon without reinserting the tendon into the base of the middle phalanx. A retrospective review of 16 digits that had the approach for a PIP joint arthroplasty with a mean follow up of 23 months found a postoperative PIP active ROM of 61° (range 25–90°). Fourteen digits had no extensor lag, while two digits had an extensor lag of 20° and 25°. This modified approach is fast and simple and does not cause an extensor lag.

Arthroplasty of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Using the Sutter Implant for Traumatic Joint Destruction

1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 565-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. MATHOULIN ◽  
A. GILBERT
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Joint Destruction ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Dorsal Approach ◽  
Active Range Of Motion ◽  
Post Traumatic ◽  
Traumatic Arthritis ◽  
Better Than

We report the functional results in a series of 21 Sutter arthroplasties for post-traumatic arthritis with an average follow-up of more than 2 years. The dorsal approach was used in every case. Pain was always present preoperatively and mobility was reduced to an average range of motion of 15°. Postoperatively, pain was absent in 18 cases. The average active range of motion was 55°. There were two fractures of implants. Although the follow-up is limited, the Sutter arthroplasty has given results that are similar to, or better than, those reported for other techniques.

scholarly journals Early Correction of Distal Radius Partial Articular Malunion Leads to Good Long-term Functional Recovery at Mean Follow-up of 4 Years

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. David Luo ◽  
Fiesky A. Nunez ◽  
Elizabeth A. Newman ◽  
Fiesky A. Nunez
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Articular Surface ◽  
Corrective Osteotomy ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Posttraumatic Arthritis ◽  
Volar Approach ◽  
Pain Scores

Background: Distal radius articular step-off or deformity may cause posttraumatic arthritis and poor functional outcome. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pain and functional outcomes in patients with malunited partial articular distal radius fractures who underwent corrective osteotomy. We hypothesized that anatomic restoration of distal radius articular surface after a malunited partial articular distal radius fracture results in improvement in pain and functional measures and delays the development of posttraumatic arthritis. Methods: Seven consecutive patients with mean age of 38 years underwent corrective osteotomy via either a standard dorsal approach or combined dorsal and volar approach. Mean time from injury to corrective osteotomy was 10 weeks. Patients were assessed with respect to Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), forearm and wrist range of motion, pain, and grip strength. Results: At mean follow-up of 44 months, significant improvements in pain scores (7.1-0.9, P < .001), QuickDASH (38.7-11.6, P < .001), grip strength (21.4-30.0 kg, P = .01) were achieved. All range of motion measurements demonstrated significant improvements except forearm pronation. One patient demonstrated radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis but had no pain at final follow-up. No patients required secondary surgery for removal of symptomatic hardware. Conclusions: Based on these findings, we recommend that early corrective osteotomies should be considered in young patients with intra-articular distal radius malunions before considering salvage procedures such as partial or complete wrist arthrodesis.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Surface Replacement Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty Using the Self Locking Finger Joint Implant: Minimum Two Years Follow-up

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 637-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Issei Komatsu ◽  
Yoshiya Arishima ◽  
Hirotomo Shibahashi ◽  
Toshihito Yamaguchi ◽  
Yoshitaka Minamikawa
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
The Self ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Surface Replacement ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Pip Joint

Background: The Self Locking Finger Joint (SLFJ) implant is a new type of surface replacement implant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate midterm clinical outcomes of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) arthroplasty with the SLFJ implant. Methods: We retrospectively studied 26 PIP joint arthroplasties using the SLFJ implant in 17 patients with osteoarthritis or posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, grip strength and key pinch, radiographic findings, and complications were evaluated. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, course of pain, and patient satisfaction were obtained. Results: The mean follow-up time was 44 months (range, 24-76 months). The average active PIP joint arc of motion improved from 36° before surgery to 44° after surgery. Grip strength and key pinch showed no statistical difference between preoperative and postoperative assessments. The average DASH score and VAS score improved from 40 to 15 and from 5 to 1, respectively. Overall patient satisfaction was 94%. Ninety percent of implants showed osteointegration, and there were no radiographic signs of migration and loosening. Three joints (12%) showed abnormal heterotopic bone formation. Four joints (15%) had secondary surgery—1 joint needing joint head and socket replacement and 3 joints needing contracture release. Conclusions: Our minimum 2 years of follow-up evaluation of the SLFJ implant PIP joint arthroplasty demonstrated good pain relief and good overall patient satisfaction while maintaining joint range of motion. The SLFJ implant showed good osteointegration. Further longer-term prospective studies with various types of currently available implants are needed.

scholarly journals Surface Replacement Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty: A Case Series

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 669-674
Author(s):  
Pieter W. Jordaan ◽  
Duncan McGuire ◽  
Michael W. Solomons
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Surface Replacement ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: In 2012, our unit published our experience with a pyrocarbon proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) implant. Due to high subsidence rates, a decision was made to change to a cemented surface replacement proximal interphalangeal joint (SR-PIPJ) implant. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the change to a cemented implant would improve the subsidence rates. Methods: Retrospective review of all patients who had a cemented SR-PIPJ arthroplasty performed from 2011 to 2013 with at least 12 months follow-up. Results: A total of 43 joints were included with an average follow-up of 26.5 months. There was a significant ( P = .02) improvement in arc of motion with an average satisfaction score of 3.3 (satisfied patient). Subsidence was noted in 26% of joints with a significant difference in range of motion ( P = .003) and patient satisfaction ( P = .001) between the group with and without subsidence. Conclusions: The change to a cemented implant resulted in satisfied patients with an improvement in range of motion. The rate of subsidence improved but remains unacceptably high.

Extension-Block Pinning for Unstable Dorsal Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture-Dislocations: A Simple, Percutaneous Technique With Reproducible Outcomes

Hand ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 155894472110663
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Worgul ◽  
Andrew B. Stein
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Articular Surface ◽  
Kirschner Wire ◽  
Proximal Phalanx ◽  
Treatment Delay ◽  
Joint Fracture ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Pip Joint

Background: Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint fracture-dislocations can be technically challenging injuries to treat, and no technique has proven to be superior nor lead to predictably good outcomes. We describe our experience of treating unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the PIP joint with extension-block pinning (EBP) at our institution over a 22-year period. Methods: In all, 23 patients with 24 unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the PIP joint treated with EBP between January 1998 and October 2020 were identified. All patients underwent closed reduction of the PIP joint and insertion of a Kirschner wire into the proximal phalanx, creating a mechanical block. Range of motion and joint congruity were assessed at final clinic follow-up. Long-term function was assessed via completion of a Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was utilized to assess if any association existed between treatment delay, pin-in-body days, or amount of articular surface involved and QuickDASH score. Results: Mean range of motion at final follow-up was 83.3° and 22 of 24 PIP joints demonstrated a congruent reduction. In all, 15 of the 23 patients completed the QuickDASH questionnaire at a median long-term follow-up of 57.5 months (range: 3-157 months). Average QuickDASH score was 18.8, indicating minimal long-term disability. No statistically significant associations were found between treatment delay, pin-in-body days, or amount of articular surface involved and QuickDASH score. Conclusions: EBP offers a simple and innovative method to treat a complex injury of the PIP joint. It is technically straightforward and cheap, and produces excellent functional outcomes with minimal long-term disability.

Comparison of Volar and Dorsal Approach for PIP Arthroplasty

Hand ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 155894471986171
Author(s):  
Geneva V. Tranchida ◽  
Scott T. Allen ◽  
Susan M. Moen ◽  
Lauren O. Erickson ◽  
Christina M. Ward
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Hand Therapy ◽  
Dorsal Approach ◽  
Volar Approach ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: No consensus exists about whether a volar approach (VA) or dorsal approach (DA) for proximal interphalangeal (PIP) arthroplasty yields better results. Previously reported range of motion (ROM) and complications vary from study to study. This retrospective review compared the ROM and complication rates of VA and DA approaches to PIP arthroplasty. Methods: The study included 66 adults (88 digits) who underwent PIP arthroplasty from 2000 to 2015, with minimum 30-day follow-up. Demographic data, surgical approach, pre- and post-operative ROM, duration of immobilization, timing and duration of hand therapy (occupational therapy [OT]), and major and minor complications were recorded. We compared mean change in ROM, postoperative ROM, and complication rates, and examined the association of duration of immobilization and time to OT initiation with postoperative ROM. Results: While there was no difference in postoperative ROM between volar and dorsal groups (56° and 54°, respectively, P > .05), there was a greater gain in ROM in the DA group (25° vs 2.7°, P = .017). There was no statistically significant difference in overall incidence of complications (VA: 37.8%, DA: 30.3%; P > .05) or revision surgery (VA: 15.6%, DA: 17.1%; P > .05). There were no differences in duration of immobilization, time to OT initiation, or number of OT sessions between the two groups, and none of these correlated with postoperative ROM. Conclusions: We identified no statistical difference in mean postoperative ROM, incidence of complications or revision surgery between volar and dorsal approaches for PIP arthroplasty.

Autologous Osteochondral Graft for Early Posttraumatic Arthritis of Tibiotalar Joints After Comminuted Pilon Fractures in Young Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Liu ◽  
Jingjing An ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Yaxing Li ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Joint Surface ◽  
Posttraumatic Arthritis ◽  
Osteochondral Graft ◽  
Tibiotalar Joint ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Pilon Fractures

Background: Posttraumatic arthritis of tibiotalar joints after AO/OTA type C3 pilon fractures, especially in young patients with a significant osteochondral defect in the tibial plafond joint surface, is a challenging situation. We report a joint-preserving technique using autologous osteochondral graft in combination with ankle distraction and supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT), if necessary, to improve its outcome. Methods: Seventeen patients with an average age of 32.1 years with Takakura grade 1 to 3A posttraumatic arthritis of the tibiotalar joint after AO/OTA type C3 pilon fractures received osteochondral autograft transplantation, ankle distraction, and SMOT, when supramalleolar malalignment was present, between February 2010 and November 2015. The visual analog scale (VAS), Short-Form 36 (SF-36) score, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and ankle range of motion were used for outcome analysis. Radiographic assessment of any SMOT and the apparent joint space was performed. Fourteen patients were followed for an average of 18 months. Results: The VAS, SF-36, and AOFAS scores as well as the ankle range of motion all improved significantly at the last follow-up after the surgery ( P < .01). No deep surgical site infection, donor site complication, nonunion, osteochondral block loosening, or resorption was noted. No secondary arthrodesis was needed at the end of follow-up. Conclusion: Autologous osteochondral graft transplantation in combination with ankle distraction and SMOT was a promising joint-preserving technique for early posttraumatic arthritis of tibiotalar joint after severe pilon fractures in young patients. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Bioreconstructive Poly-L/D-Lactide Implant Compared With Swanson Prosthesis in Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 746-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.B. Honkanen ◽  
R. Thonen ◽  
E.T. Skyttä ◽  
M. Ikävalko ◽  
M.U.K. Lehto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Joint Destruction ◽  
Metacarpophalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Silicone Implant ◽  
Clinical Assessments ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study

It was hypothesized that the bioresorbable interposition implant might offer a viable alternative to conventional silicone implant arthroplasty in rheumatoid metacarpophalangeal joint destruction. A randomized clinical study was performed to compare a stemless poly-L/D-lactide copolymer 96: 4 (PLDLA) implant with the Swanson silicone implant. Results in 52 patients (53 hands and 175 joints) at a mean follow-up of 2 years (minimum 1 year) showed that the improvement in clinical assessments was comparable in both groups, except for better maintenance of palmar alignment in the Swanson group. The lack of implant fractures and intramedullary osteolysis were advantages of the PLDLA implant. The bioresorbable PLDLA interposition implant may offer an alternative tool for tailored reconstruction of rheumatoid metacarpophalangeal joints.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document