scholarly journals A Multi-Regge Model with the Threshold Factor for Cluster Production: Two-Component Analysis of Multiplicity Distributions in p-p Collisions at 50 400 GeV/c

1976 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 1258-1268
Author(s):  
H. Ito ◽  
K. Sasaki ◽  
F. Tanaka ◽  
T. Togawa
2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 014708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takafumi D. Yamamoto ◽  
Ryuji Okazaki ◽  
Hiroki Taniguchi ◽  
Ichiro Terasaki

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryony A. Thompson ◽  
Russell Bell ◽  
Bryan E. Welm ◽  
John Burn ◽  
Sean V. Tavtigian

AbstractDriven by massively parallel sequencing and allied technologies, the scale of genetic predisposition testing is on a dramatic uptrend. While many patients are found to carry clinically actionable pathogenic sequence variants, testing also reveals enormous numbers of Unclassified Variants (UV), or Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS), most of which are rare missense substitutions. Following IARC variant classification guidelines, quantitative methods have been developed to integrate multiple data types for clinical UV evaluation in BRCA1/2; results from these analyses are recorded in the BRCA gene Ex-UV database (hci-exlovd.hci.utah.edu). In variant classification, the rate-limiting step is often accumulation of patient observational data. Recently, functional assays evaluating BRCA1 RING domain and C-terminal substitutions have been calibrated, enabling variant classification through a two-component combination of sequence analysis-based predictions with functional assay results. This two-component classification was embedded in a decision tree with safeguards to avoid misclassification. For the two-component analysis, sensitivity is 87.5%, specificity is 100%, and the error rate 0.0%. Classification of a UV as likely pathogenic or likely neutral does not require certainty; the probabilistic definitions of the categories imply an error rate. Combining sequence analysis with functional assay data in two-component analysis added 146 BRCA1 variants to the Ex-UV database.


Author(s):  
Verena Wagner

AbstractIn this paper, I spell out a descriptive account of agnosticism that captures the intuitive view that a subject enters the mental state of agnosticism via an act or event called suspension. I will argue that agnosticism is a complex mental state, and that the formation of an attitude is the relevant act or event by which a subject commits to indecision regarding some matter. I will suggest a ‘two-component analysis’ that addresses two aspects that jointly account for the settled state of agnosticism: (1) the subject’s de facto indecision and (2) the subject’s commitment to her indecision. Unlike meta-cognitivist or sui generis accounts, I do not take the agnostic’s commitment to indecision as constitutive for her indecision but rather as an evaluation or qualification of the indecision that she already exhibits. Agnosticism, thus, is a settled form of indecision that marks the end of inquiry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document