Finnmark Platform Composite Tectono-Sedimentary Element, Barents Sea

2021 ◽  
pp. M57-2020-20
Author(s):  
E. Henriksen ◽  
D. Ktenas ◽  
J. K. Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Basement Rocks ◽  
Sea Bottom ◽  
Middle Carboniferous ◽  
Uralian Orogen ◽  
Glacial Periods

AbstractThe Finnmark Platform Composite Tectono-Sedimentary Element (CTSE), located in the southern Barents Sea, is a northward-dipping monoclinal structural unit. It covers most of the southern Norwegian Barents Sea where it borders the Norwegian Mainland. Except for the different age of basement, the CTSE extends eastwards into the Kola Monocline on the Russian part of the Barents Sea.The general water depth varies between 200-350 m, and the sea bottom is influenced by Plio-Pleistocene glaciations. A high frequency of scour marks and deposition of moraine materials exists on the platform areas. Successively older strata sub-crop below the Upper Regional Unconformity (URU, which was) formed by several glacial periods.Basement rocks of Neoproterozoic age are heavily affected by the Caledonian Orogeny, and previously by the Timanide tectonic compression in the easternmost part of the Finnmark Platform CTSE.Depth to crystalline basement varies considerably and is estimated to be from 4-5 to 10 km. Following the Caledonian orogenesis, the Finnmark Platform was affected by Lower to Middle Carboniferous rifting, sediment input from the Uralian Orogen in the east, the Upper Jurassic / Lower Cretaceous rift phase and the Late Plio-Pleistocene isostatic uplift.A total of 8 exploration wells drilled different targets on the platform. Two minor discoveries have been made proving presence of both oil and gas and potential sandstone reservoirs of good quality identified in the Visean, Induan, Anisian and Carnian intervals. In addition, thick sequences of Perm-Carboniferous carbonates and spiculitic chert are proven in the eastern Platform area. The deep reservoirs are believed to be charged from Paleozoic sources. A western extension of the Domanik source rocks well documented in the Timan-Pechora Basin may exist towards the eastern part of the Finnmark Platform. In the westernmost part, charge from juxtaposed down-faulted basins may be possible.

HYDROCARBON HABITAT OF THE SURAT/BOWEN BASIN

1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 213 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Thomas ◽  
D. G. Osborne ◽  
A. J. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Lower Jurassic ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Lateral Migration ◽  
Early Maturity ◽  
Oil And Gas Fields ◽  
Basement Rocks ◽  
Origin Of Oil ◽  
Gas Fields ◽  
Geochemical Studies

Ever since the early discoveries at Cabawin (1960) and Moonie (1961), the origin of oil and gas in the Surat/Bowen Basin has been a subject of speculation. Hydrocarbons have been found in reservoirs ranging in age from Permian to Early Jurassic; even fractured pre-Permian 'basement' rocks have occasionally recorded shows.Recent geochemical studies have identified rich source rocks within the Jurassic, Triassic and Permian sequences. The Middle Jurassic Walloon Coal Measures are thermally immature throughout the Surat Basin and are unlikely to have generated significant amounts of hydrocarbons. Lower Jurassic Evergreen Formation source rocks have reached 'nominal early maturity' (VR = 0.6) in parts of the basin. The Middle Triassic Moolayember Formation lies within the oil generation zone in the northern Taroom Trough. However, no oil has yet been confidently correlated with either a Jurassic or a Triassic source. On geochemical and geological grounds it is likely that most, if not all, of the hydrocarbons discovered to date were generated from Permian source rocks.The probability of finding gas as well as oil in Permian, Triassic or Jurassic reservoirs increases from south to north, in accord with organic maturity trends in the Permian of the Taroom Trough. On the narrow thrust-bounded eastern flank, vertical migration has occurred, resulting in oilfields at Moonie and Bennett. In contrast, extensive lateral migration of hydrocarbons across the gentle western flank of the basin is indicated by numerous small oil and gas fields on the Roma Shelf and Wunger Ridge.

Why does not lithology correlate with gamma-ray spikes in the shaley source rocks of the Upper Jurassic Alge Member (southwestern Barents Sea)?

2020 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 104623
Author(s):  
Solveig Helleren ◽  
Dora Marín ◽  
Sverre Ohm ◽  
Carita Augustsson ◽  
Alejandro Escalona
Keyword(s):  
Gamma Ray ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Source Rocks

THE GEOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF THE SOUTH PEPPER HYDROCARBON ACCUMULATION

1985 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 235 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.F. Williams ◽  
D.J. Poynton
Keyword(s):  
Middle Miocene ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Lower Jurassic ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
The South ◽  
Hydrocarbon Migration ◽  
Tectonic Event ◽  
The North ◽  
Migration History

The South Pepper field, discovered in 1982, is located 30 km southwest of Barrow Island in the offshore portion of the Barrow Sub-basin, Western Australia. The oil and gas accumulation occurs in the uppermost sands of the Lower Cretaceous Barrow Group and the overlying low permeability Mardie Greensand Member of the Muderong Shale.The hydrocarbons are trapped in one of several fault closed anticlines which lie on a high trend that includes the North Herald, Pepper and Barrow Island structures. This trend is postulated to have formed during the late Valanginian as the result of differential compaction and drape over a buried submarine fan sequence. During the Turonian the trend acted as a locus for folding induced by right-lateral wrenching along the sub-basin edge. Concurrent normal faulting dissected the fold into a number of smaller anticlines. This essentially compressional tectonic phase contrasted with the earlier extensional regime which was associated with rift development during the Callovian. A compressional tectonic event in the Middle Miocene produced apparent reverse movement on the South Pepper Fault but only minor changes to the structural closure.Geochemical and structural evidence indicates at least two periods of hydrocarbon migration into the top Barrow Group - Mardie Greensand reservoir. The earlier occurred in the Turonian subsequent to the period of wrench tectonics and involved the migration of oil from Lower Jurassic Dingo Claystone source rocks up the South Pepper Fault. This oil was biodegraded before the second episode of migration occurred after the Middle Miocene tectonism. The later oil is believed to have been sourced by the Middle to Upper Jurassic Dingo Claystone. Biodegradation at this stage ceased or became insignificant due to temperature increase and reduction of meteoric water flow. Gas-condensate, sourced from Triassic or Lower Jurassic sediments may have migrated into the structure with this second oil although a more recent migration cannot be ruled out.The proposed structural and hydrocarbon migration history fits regional as well as local geological observations for the Barrow Sub-basin. Further data particularly from older sections of the stratigraphic column within the area are needed to refine the interpretation.

scholarly journals Structural reconstructions of the Eastern Barents Sea at Meso-Tertiary evolution and influence on petroleum potential

Georesursy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-84
Author(s):  
Anna A. Suslova ◽  
Antonina V. Stoupakova ◽  
Alina V. Mordasova ◽  
Roman S. Sautkin
Keyword(s):  
Barents Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Lower Jurassic ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Petroleum Exploration ◽  
Seismic Profiles ◽  
Borehole Data ◽  
Petroleum Potential ◽  
Petroleum Systems ◽  
Novaya Zemlya

Barents Sea basin is the most explored and studied by the regional and petroleum geologists on the Russian Arctic shelf and has approved gas reserves. However, there are many questions in the petroleum exploration, one of them is the structural reconstruction. During its geological evolution, Barents Sea shelf was influenced by the Pre-Novaya Zemlya structural zone that uplifted several times in Mesozoic and Cenozoic. The main goal of the research is to clarify the periods of structural reconstructions of the Eastern Barents shelf and its influence on the petroleum systems of the Barents Sea shelf. A database of regional seismic profiles and offshore borehole data collected over the past decade on the Petroleum Geology Department of the Lomonosov Moscow State University allows to define main unconformities and seismic sequences, to reconstruct the periods of subsidence and uplifts in Mesozoic and Cenozoic. The structural reconstructions on the Eastern Barents Sea in the Triassic-Jurassic boundary led to intensive uplifts and formation of the huge inversion swells, which is expressed in erosional truncation and stratigraphic unconformity in the Upper Triassic and Lower Jurassic strata. In the Jurassic period, tectonic subsidence reigned on the shelf, when the uplifts including the highs of Novaya Zemlya were partially flooded and regional clay seal and source rocks – Upper Jurassic «black clays» – deposited on the shelf. The next contraction phase manifested itself as a second impulse of the growth of inversion swells in the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous. Cenozoic uplift of the Pre-Novaya Zemlya structural zone and the entire Barents Sea shelf led to significant erosion of the Mesozoic sediments, on the one hand, forming modern structural traps, and on the other, significantly destroying the Albian, once regional seal.

scholarly journals Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous source rocks in the Norwegian Barents Sea, part II: Insights from open- and closed-system pyrolysis experiments

2021 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 105343
Author(s):  
Andrés Cedeño ◽  
Sverre Ohm ◽  
Alejandro Escalona ◽  
Dora Marín ◽  
Snorre Olaussen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Closed System ◽  
Lower Cretaceous ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Source Rocks

scholarly journals Modeling petroleum expulsion in sedimentary basins: The importance of igneous intrusion timing and basement composition

Geology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 904-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Gardiner ◽  
Nick Schofield ◽  
Alex Finlay ◽  
Niall Mark ◽  
Liam Holt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Sedimentary Basins ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Petroleum Exploration ◽  
Burial Depth ◽  
Radiogenic Heat ◽  
Critical Moment ◽  
The North ◽  
Petroleum Generation

Abstract The concept of a critical moment in a petroleum system (the time of highest probability of entrapment and preservation of oil and gas) has underlain petroleum exploration for over 25 years. However, one area where understanding the critical moment is challenging is the Faroe-Shetland Basin (FSB; offshore UK). Isotopic dating of oils suggests that petroleum generation began between ca. 68 and 90 Ma; however, most basin models invoke an earlier generation beginning in the mid-Cretaceous at ca. 100 Ma, predating deposition of Paleocene and Eocene reservoirs. This time discrepancy has previously been explained by remigration from intermediary accumulations (“motel” hypothesis) and/or overpressure retardation of kerogen maturation. The FSB is characterized by a thick Cretaceous stratigraphic package (up to 5 km) that includes a large net thickness (up to 2 km) of Paleogene igneous material. In our model, separating sedimentary and igneous material and adding the igneous material at the correct time between ca. 58 and 55 Ma shallows the modeled burial depth of the Upper Jurassic source rocks during the Cretaceous sufficiently to delay maturation by 17 m.y. in comparison to results of previous studies. Additionally, previous studies have invoked crustal radiogenic heat production (RHP) based on the Phanerozoic crust averaging ∼2.8 µW/m3 in the North Sea (300 km to the east). However, the FSB basement is composed of significantly older, colder Neoarchean orthogneisses (ca. 2.7–2.9 Ga), reducing RHP by up to 50% to ∼1.6 µW/m3 (σ = 0.74). For the first time, our model unifies geological, geochronological, and geochemical observations, delaying the onset of petroleum expulsion by up to 40 m.y. in comparison to previous models.

scholarly journals Hydrocarbons in the basement of the South China Sea (Vietnam) shelf and structural-tectonic model of their formation

2019 ◽  
pp. 44-61
Author(s):  
V. Yu. Kerimov ◽  
M. G. Leonov ◽  
A. V. Osipov ◽  
R. N. Mustaev ◽  
Vu Nam Khai
Keyword(s):  
South China Sea ◽  
South China ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
The South China Sea ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
The South ◽  
China Sea ◽  
Tectonic Model ◽  
Basement Rocks ◽  
Hydrocarbon Deposits

Research of genesis of hydrocarbon accumulations located within pre-Cenozoic basement of the South China Sea shelf (Vietnam) presented. Formation of hydrocarbon deposits is confined to the protrusive massifs of granites that have undergone structural and tectonic processing at the stage of prototectonics and postmagmatic tectonics. The totality of post-structure-forming processes led to a change in the viscosity properties of rocks, to their tectonic and material heterogeneity and stratification and, as a consequence, to vertical and lateral redistribution in space with the formation of granite protrusions. The mechanisms of formation of voids and oil and gas traps within the protrusions are considered. Based on the similarity of the geochemical characteristics and biomarker parameters of the oils and organic matter in the Oligocene-Miocene sediments and in the basement rocks, a conclusion has been made about the organic nature of the oils in the basement of the shelf of the South China Sea (Vietnam). Possible mechanisms of migration and accumulation of hydrocarbons in basement rocks are considered. It is confirmed that the formation of hydrocarbon deposits occurred due to lateral and downward migration of hydrocarbons through the contact area from the Oligocene-Miocene source rocks into crystalline massifs — into voids and increased fracture zone in the protrusions.

The 35/9-7 Skarfjell discovery: a genuine stratigraphic trap, NE North Sea, Norway

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 339-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens-Ole Koch ◽  
Andreas Frischbutter ◽  
Kjell Øygard ◽  
John Cater
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
North Sea ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Submarine Canyon ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Gas Reservoirs ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Recoverable Resources ◽  
Oil Source

AbstractThe Skarfjell oil and gas discovery, situated 50 km north of the Troll Field in the NE North Sea, was discovered by well 35/9-7 and was appraised by three additional wells operated by Wintershall, in the period 2012–14.The Skarfjell discovery is an example of a combined structural/stratigraphic trap. The trap formed along the northern edge of a deep WNW–ESE-trending submarine canyon, which was created by Volgian erosion of intra-Heather, Oxfordian-aged sandstones and then infilled with Draupne Formation shales. This mud-filled canyon forms the top and side seal, with the bottom seal provided by Heather shales. The reservoir comprises mid-Oxfordian deep-water turbidites and sediment gravity flows, which formed in response to tectonic hinterland uplift and erosion of the basin margin, 10–20 km to the east.The Skarfjell discovery contains light oil and gas, and may be subdivided into Skarfjell West, in which the main oil reservoir and gas cap have known contacts, and Skarfjell Southeast, which comprises thinner oil and gas reservoirs with slightly lower pressure and unknown hydrocarbon contacts.The Upper Jurassic Draupne and Heather formations are excellent source rocks in the study area. They have generated large volumes of oil and gas reservoired in fields, and discoveries for which the dominant source rock and its maturity have been established by oil to source rock correlation and geochemical biomarker analysis. The Skarfjell fluids were expelled from mid-mature oil source rocks of mixed Heather and Draupne Formation origin.The recoverable resources are estimated at between 9 and 16 million standard cubic metres (Sm3) of recoverable oil and condensate, and 4–6 billion Sm3 of recoverable gas. The Skarfjell discovery is currently in the pre-development phase and is expected to come on stream in 2021.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document