Boundary evaluation using adaptive polygonization

Author(s):  
James M. Mullner ◽  
Andrei G. Jablokow
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Rafael Bidarra ◽  
Willem J. Neels ◽  
Willem F. Bronsvoort

Feature modeling systems usually employ a boundary representation (b-rep) to store the shape information on a product. It has, however, been shown that a b-rep has a number of shortcomings, and that a cellular model can be a valuable alternative. A cellular model stores additional shape information on a feature, including the faces that are not on the boundary of the product. Such information can be profitably used for several purposes. A major operation in each feature modeling system is boundary evaluation, which computes the geometric model of a product, i.e. either the b-rep or the cellular model, from the features that have been specified by the user. Because it has to be executed each time a feature has been added, removed or modified, its efficiency is very important. In this paper, boundary evaluation for a cellular model is described. Subsequently, its efficiency is compared to the efficiency of boundary evaluation for a b-rep, on the basis of performance measurements and considerations for both. It turns out that boundary evaluation for a cellular model is in fact more efficient than for a b-rep, which makes cellular models even more attractive as an alternative for b-reps.


2013 ◽  
Vol 860-863 ◽  
pp. 2112-2116
Author(s):  
Pavel V. Chusovitin ◽  
Andrey V. Pazderin ◽  
Grigory S. Shabalin ◽  
Valery A. Taschilin

The paper is devoted to the stability and feasibility boundary evaluation. New technique for evaluating shortest distance to feasibility boundary is described and tested. The technique is based on analysis of Jacobi matrix form the power flow routine. Described technique can be applied together with PMU-based identification procedures leading to new opportunities for on-line power system stability monitoring.


1996 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 187-204
Author(s):  
ALEXANDER I.CHUBAREV

An approach to the reliable boundary evaluation for polyhedral solids is proposed. The approach is based on the three ideas: an approximate evaluation of the Boolean operations is performed; precise calculations are performed at micro-level by using only exact numbers; triangulations are used for the boundary representation. Test examples illustrating efficiency of the approach are presented.


1991 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 40-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Ferruci ◽  
Alberto Paoluzzi
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Alan Jappy ◽  
Donald Mackenzie ◽  
Haofeng Chen

Ensuring sufficient safety against ratcheting is a fundamental requirement of pressure vessel design. However, determining the ratchet boundary using a full elastic plastic finite element analysis can be problematic and a number of direct methods have been proposed to overcome difficulties associated with ratchet boundary evaluation. This paper proposes a new approach, similar to the previously proposed Hybrid method but based on fully implicit elastic-plastic solution strategies. This method utilizes superimposed elastic stresses and modified radial return integration to converge on the residual state throughout, resulting in one Finite Element model suitable for solving the cyclic stresses (stage 1) and performing the augmented limit analysis to determine the ratchet boundary (stage 2). The modified radial return methods for both stages of the analysis are presented, with the corresponding stress update algorithm and resulting consistent tangent moduli. Comparisons with other direct methods for selected benchmark problems are presented. It is shown that the proposed method consistently evaluates a lower bound estimate of the ratchet boundary, which has not been demonstrated for the Hybrid method and is yet to be clearly shown for the UMY and LDYM methods. Limitations in the description of plastic strains and compatibility during the ratchet analysis are identified as being a cause for the differences between the proposed methods and other current upper bound methods.


2007 ◽  
Vol 101 (9) ◽  
pp. 094502 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Valletta ◽  
A. Bonfiglietti ◽  
M. Rapisarda ◽  
L. Mariucci ◽  
G. Fortunato ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document