boundary evaluation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

45
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Carlos-Emiliano González-Gallardo ◽  
Juan-Manuel Torres-Moreno


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 090101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanshan Shen Shanshan Shen ◽  
Qian Chen Qian Chen ◽  
Weiji He Weiji He ◽  
Yuqiang Wang Yuqiang Wang


2015 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 51-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Ogayar-Anguita ◽  
Á.L. García-Fernández ◽  
F.R. Feito-Higueruela ◽  
R.J. Segura-Sánchez
Keyword(s):  


2013 ◽  
Vol 860-863 ◽  
pp. 2112-2116
Author(s):  
Pavel V. Chusovitin ◽  
Andrey V. Pazderin ◽  
Grigory S. Shabalin ◽  
Valery A. Taschilin

The paper is devoted to the stability and feasibility boundary evaluation. New technique for evaluating shortest distance to feasibility boundary is described and tested. The technique is based on analysis of Jacobi matrix form the power flow routine. Described technique can be applied together with PMU-based identification procedures leading to new opportunities for on-line power system stability monitoring.



2013 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Jappy ◽  
Donald Mackenzie ◽  
Haofeng Chen

Ensuring sufficient safety against ratcheting is a fundamental requirement in pressure vessel design. However, determining the ratchet boundary using a full elastic-plastic finite element analysis can be problematic and a number of direct methods have been proposed to overcome difficulties associated with ratchet boundary evaluation. This paper proposes a new lower bound ratchet analysis approach, similar to the previously proposed hybrid method but based on fully implicit elastic-plastic solution strategies. The method utilizes superimposed elastic stresses and modified radial return integration to converge on the residual state throughout, resulting in one finite element model suitable for solving the cyclic stresses (stage 1) and performing the augmented limit analysis to determine the ratchet boundary (stage 2). The modified radial return methods for both stages of the analysis are presented, with the corresponding stress update algorithm and resulting consistent tangent moduli. Comparisons with other direct methods for selected benchmark problems are presented. It is shown that the proposed method evaluates a consistent lower bound estimate of the ratchet boundary, which has not previously been clearly demonstrated for other lower bound approaches. Limitations in the description of plastic strains and compatibility during the ratchet analysis are identified as being a cause for the differences between the proposed methods and current upper bound methods.



2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Jappy ◽  
Donald Mackenzie ◽  
Haofeng Chen

Ensuring sufficient safety against ratchet is a fundamental requirement in pressure vessel design. Determining the ratchet boundary can prove difficult and computationally expensive when using a full elastic–plastic finite element analysis and a number of direct methods have been proposed that overcome the difficulties associated with ratchet boundary evaluation. Here, a new approach based on fully implicit finite element methods, similar to conventional elastic–plastic methods, is presented. The method utilizes a two-stage procedure. The first stage determines the cyclic stress state, which can include a varying residual stress component, by repeatedly converging on the solution for the different loads by superposition of elastic stress solutions using a modified elastic–plastic solution. The second stage calculates the constant loads which can be added to the steady cycle while ensuring the equivalent stresses remain below a modified yield strength. During stage 2 the modified yield strength is updated throughout the analysis, thus satisfying Melan's lower bound ratchet theorem. This is achieved utilizing the same elastic plastic model as the first stage, and a modified radial return method. The proposed methods are shown to provide better agreement with upper bound ratchet methods than other lower bound ratchet methods, however limitations in these are identified and discussed.





Author(s):  
Alan Jappy ◽  
Donald Mackenzie ◽  
Haofeng Chen

Ensuring sufficient safety against ratcheting is a fundamental requirement of pressure vessel design. However, determining the ratchet boundary using a full elastic plastic finite element analysis can be problematic and a number of direct methods have been proposed to overcome difficulties associated with ratchet boundary evaluation. This paper proposes a new approach, similar to the previously proposed Hybrid method but based on fully implicit elastic-plastic solution strategies. This method utilizes superimposed elastic stresses and modified radial return integration to converge on the residual state throughout, resulting in one Finite Element model suitable for solving the cyclic stresses (stage 1) and performing the augmented limit analysis to determine the ratchet boundary (stage 2). The modified radial return methods for both stages of the analysis are presented, with the corresponding stress update algorithm and resulting consistent tangent moduli. Comparisons with other direct methods for selected benchmark problems are presented. It is shown that the proposed method consistently evaluates a lower bound estimate of the ratchet boundary, which has not been demonstrated for the Hybrid method and is yet to be clearly shown for the UMY and LDYM methods. Limitations in the description of plastic strains and compatibility during the ratchet analysis are identified as being a cause for the differences between the proposed methods and other current upper bound methods.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document