You Do Not Decide for Me! Evaluating Explainable Group Aggregation Strategies for Tourism

Author(s):  
Shabnam Najafian ◽  
Daniel Herzog ◽  
Sihang Qiu ◽  
Oana Inel ◽  
Nava Tintarev
Keyword(s):  
1969 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 704-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald K. Siegel ◽  
Jean Poole

When large populations of mice were treated with LSD (2mcg/kg to 30mcg/kg), bufotenine (5mg/kg to 30mg/kg), a cannabis sativa extract (50mg/kg to 100mg/kg), or tetrahydrocannabinol (2mg/kg to 10mg/kg), there was a dramatic change in social behavior. Such treatment produced a significant reduction in aggression, group aggregation, and temporary disruptions of social hierarchies. Hallucinogenic-treated mice placed in normal untreated colonies were hypersensitive to auditory and tactile stimulation and aggregated in small groups apart from the rest of the population. Treatment with saline or BOL-148 produced no significant changes in behavior.


2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 6_84-6_89
Author(s):  
Hiroshi KAMADA ◽  
Rikiya FUKUZAWA ◽  
Takayoshi KONDO

Polimery ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 42 (09) ◽  
pp. 532-537
Author(s):  
CZESLAW SLUSARCZYK ◽  
ANDRZEJ WLOCHOWICZ
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Minnis ◽  
Maj-Britt Posserud ◽  
Lucy Thompson ◽  
Christopher Gillberg

We integrate recent findings from neuro-anatomy, electroencephalography, quantum biology and social/neurodevelopment to propose that the brain surface might be specialised for communication with other brains. Ground breaking, but still small-scale, research has demonstrated that human brains can act in synchrony and detect the brain activity of other human brains. Group aggregation, in all species, maximises community support and safety but does not depend on verbal or visual interaction. The morphology of the brain’s outermost layers, across a wide range of species, exhibits a highly folded fractal structure that is likely to maximise exchange at the surface: in humans, a reduced brain surface area is associated with disorders of social communication. The brain sits in a vulnerable exposed location where it is prone to damage, rather than being housed in a central location such as within the ribcage. These observations have led us to the hypothesis that the brain surface might be specialised for interacting with other brains at its surface, allowing synchronous non-verbal interaction. To our knowledge, this has not previously been proposed or investigated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document